主题学与中国叙事文化学的构建

发布时间：2018-05-20 14:12

本文选题：主题学 + 中国古代叙事文学　；参考：《中州学刊》2007年01期

【摘要】：汉代王充在《论衡》中说:“知古不知今,谓之陆沉;知今不知古,谓之盲瞽。”如何充分利用中国古典文学的丰富资源,在全球化语境中,勇于开拓而不失去自己精神的家园,成为一个知古知今、知中知外的学者,已经不再局限于古典文学研究与国际汉学研究,而成为当代学术研究的共同课题。有感于此,本刊邀集活跃于相关领域的当代学人,以“中国古典文学资源的当代益用”为题发表笔谈。本期推出的一组文章中,美国哈佛大学博士、香港城市大学教授张隆溪先生的《文学理论与中国古典文学研究》意在结合自己的《道与逻各斯》一书,就当前国际汉学与西方理论成果在中国古典文学研究领域的应用提出自己的看法,其重点在于如何正确运用中国与西方阐释学理论与方法。苏州大学教授方汉文先生将视域集中于当前讨论的焦点之一,即如何建立中国文学史新模式的目标上。南开大学教授宁稼雨先生则就当今古代文学研究中跨文化的主题学提出自己的看法。主题学方法近年来在中国古典文学与比较文学研究中均相当流行,如何看待其得失,并使其本土化,如何创建具有中国特色的叙事文化学,是本文所提出的重要问题。北京大学葛晓音教授从广义的国学研究角度进行的反思,会引起更多学者的关注,这也是意料之中的。本组文章与一般流行的笔谈不同之处在于:作者以各自的实际研究成果来展示自己的观念,并不停留于空泛地谈论应当如何,或是就某一个观点展开激烈争论。这未必不是进入21世纪以来文学研究界相当重要的一种理论话语模式。归根结底,并不在于提倡“问题”还是“主义”,而是研究的实绩能说明一切。当然,我们仍继续推出多种形式、多种看法的文章,其中也可能包括有争议的观点,目的在于促进古典文学研究的跨学科与多元化。
[Abstract]:Wang Chong in the Han Dynasty said, "to know the past is not to know the present, and to know the present is to be blind." How to make full use of the rich resources of Chinese classical literature, in the context of globalization, dare to open up without losing their spiritual homeland, and become a scholar who knows the past and knows the present, and knows the past and the outside. It is no longer confined to classical literature and international Sinology, but has become a common subject of contemporary academic research. Therefore, we invite contemporary scholars who are active in relevant fields to write on the topic of "the Contemporary use of Chinese Classical Literature Resources". In a series of articles published in this issue, Mr. Zhang Longxi, Ph.D. of Harvard University and Professor of City University of Hong Kong, "the study of Literary Theory and Chinese Classical Literature", is intended to combine his book Tao and logos. The author puts forward his own views on the application of the current international Sinology and Western theoretical achievements in the field of Chinese classical literature research, the emphasis of which is how to correctly apply the theories and methods of Chinese and Western hermeneutics. Mr. Fang Hanwen, a professor at Suzhou University, focuses on one of the focuses of the current discussion, that is, how to establish a new model of Chinese literary history. Ning Jiayu, a professor at Nankai University, puts forward his views on cross-cultural themes in the study of ancient literature. The method of subject science is very popular in the study of Chinese classical literature and comparative literature in recent years. How to treat its gains and losses, how to localize it, how to create narrative culture with Chinese characteristics, is an important problem raised in this paper. It is not surprising that Professor GE Xiaoyin's reflection from a broad view of Chinese studies at Peking University will attract more scholars' attention. The difference between this article and the popular writing is that the author presents his own ideas with his own actual research results, and does not dwell on the general discussion of what should be done, or to launch a heated debate on a certain point of view. This is not necessarily an important theoretical discourse model in literary studies since the beginning of the 21 st century. In the final analysis, it is not the promotion of "problem" or "doctrine", but the achievement of research that speaks for all. Of course, we continue to produce articles in many forms and views, which may also include controversial points of view, with the aim of promoting interdisciplinary and pluralistic studies of classical literature.
【作者单位】：南开大学中文系
【分类号】：I04

【相似文献】