建国以来关于“整理国故”问题的研究综述

发布时间：2018-06-03 21:59

本文选题：整理国故 + 国学热　；参考：《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年02期

【摘要】：受前几年国内学术界、思想界"国学热"和文化保守主义思潮一度升温等现象的影响,20世纪20年代前后颇具影响力的以旧学整理为主要内容的"整理国故"运动,在2000年前后再度受到海内外学术界特别是国内学界的重视,引起了众多学人的关注并参与研究,这与建国之初"整理国故"在国内学术研究中备受冷遇和批判形成了鲜明的对比,与此相关的一些新材料、新观点和新著述也纷纷问世。在新的研究视野里,整理国故不再是"狂舐千年枯骨",而是"以科学的精神与方法反对对主义的迷信,反对对思想的独断与专制,在学术上、政治上均有重大的意义"。整理国故并非回到"晚清",而是发展了晚清以来存疑平等的学术精神,其主旨是"再造文明"———创造新文化。在反思顾颉刚发起的疑古辨伪对中国传统文化采取的某些全盘否定的偏激态度和治学观、阐述其学术思想和活动的历史局限性的同时,更指出疑古辨伪运动并非以破坏古史摧残民族自信为职志,而是要通过祛疑以坚信,去伪以存真,最终在伪古史系统的废墟上重建科学的真古史。这些都把"整理国故"的研究日趋推向客观与深入。
[Abstract]:Influenced by the phenomenon of "national studies craze" and cultural conservatism trend of thought in the domestic academic circles in the past few years, the movement of "sorting out the national heritage" with the main content of the old academic collation around the 1920s was quite influential. Around the year 2000, the academic circles at home and abroad, especially the domestic academic circles, paid attention to it again, and attracted the attention of many scholars and participated in the research. This contrasts with the cold reception and criticism in the domestic academic research at the beginning of the founding of the people's Republic of China, and some new materials, new ideas and new works are also published one after another. In the new research field, sorting out the country is no longer "licking the bones of a thousand years", but "opposing the superstition of doctrine and the arbitrariness and despotism of thought with scientific spirit and method is of great academic and political significance." Sorting out the country is not a return to the late Qing Dynasty, but the development of the academic spirit of dubious equality since the late Qing Dynasty, the main idea of which is to "recreate civilization"-to create a new culture. At the same time, while reflecting on the radical attitude and view of scholarship adopted by Gu Jiegang on some totally negative attitudes to traditional Chinese culture, and expounding the historical limitations of his academic thought and activities, the author also points out the historical limitations of his academic thoughts and activities. Moreover, it is pointed out that the movement of antiquated falsehood does not aim at destroying the national self-confidence of ancient history, but by dispelling doubt to firmly believe that it is necessary to preserve truth and finally reconstruct the true history of science on the ruins of the system of pseudo-ancient history. All these have pushed the study of "collation of national heritage" more and more objectively and deeply.
【作者单位】：中国人民公安大学国内安全研究中心
【分类号】：K27

【参考文献】