“国学”是否应消亡
发布时间：2019-04-07 18:28
【摘要】："国学"作为中国传统文化的简称并非自古就有的概念,近代"国学"热潮与"亡国灭种"的危机、以及民族主义文化思潮不可分割。但把传统"国学"化身为当今"国家最高学术",却是大错特错。当代中国的"国学"不仅包括亘古以来的本土文化,还应容纳"五四"以后输入的西方现代文明与文化,可称为"新国学"。———此种无所不包的"新国学"观恰是对(旧)"国学"的解构。如此以来,"国学"这一称谓是否还有存在之必要?
[Abstract]:As the abbreviation of Chinese traditional culture, the concept of "national studies" is not existed since ancient times. The crisis of "national studies" and "subjugation" in modern times, as well as the trend of thought of nationalist culture are inseparable. But it is a great mistake to incarnate the traditional Sinology as the highest academic of the country today. Contemporary China's "Sinology" includes not only the ancient native culture, but also the western modern civilization and culture imported after the May 4th Movement. It can be called "New Sinology". This all-inclusive "New Sinology" view is the deconstruction of (old) "Sinology". Since then, is there any need for the term "national studies" to exist?
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：G122
，
本文编号：2454309
[Abstract]:As the abbreviation of Chinese traditional culture, the concept of "national studies" is not existed since ancient times. The crisis of "national studies" and "subjugation" in modern times, as well as the trend of thought of nationalist culture are inseparable. But it is a great mistake to incarnate the traditional Sinology as the highest academic of the country today. Contemporary China's "Sinology" includes not only the ancient native culture, but also the western modern civilization and culture imported after the May 4th Movement. It can be called "New Sinology". This all-inclusive "New Sinology" view is the deconstruction of (old) "Sinology". Since then, is there any need for the term "national studies" to exist?
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：G122
，
本文编号：2454309
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/2454309.html
