贵州省二重开放与产业集聚研究
本文关键词: 内陆地区 二重开放 产业集聚 非线性分析 出处:《贵州财经大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:区域产业集聚与开放程度关系是近年来学术研究热点问题之一。研究重点在于开放程度的衡量,开放对产业集聚的作用机制,以及非线性问题的讨论。多数研究人员关注的是国际开放、沿海地区的国际开放、沿海地区的二重开放,而较少关注内陆地区的国际开放和区际开放与产业集聚问题,更鲜有人将二重开放作为整体来研究内陆地区产业集聚。在前人的基础上,本文以贵州省为例,从理论和实证角度研究了内陆地区二重开放对产业集聚的影响。理论方面,通过梳理国内外现有文献,了解开放与产业集聚之间的作用机制,并在此基础上提出了本文的三条假说。一是内陆地区在开放过程中属于边缘区,因此国际开放程度越高,产业集聚水平越低。二是内陆地区的国际开放对产业集聚的促进作用小于区际开放对产业集聚的促进作用。三是内陆地区二重开放程度与产业集聚之间存在先下降后上升的非线性关系。实证方面,本文选取4个区际开放指标,通过主成分分析法构造区际开放度指标,运用外商直接投资比重和外贸依存度指标构造国际开放指标,通过赫芬达尔指数和空间基尼系数描述地区产业集聚水平。运用量化指标反映了贵州省这一内陆地区的产业集聚、国际开放程度和区际开放度的现状及发展趋势,并通过这些指标的基本统计量和相关系数,对二重开放与产业集聚进行初步直观分析。其次分别考虑对外开放与区际开放对产业集聚的影响,并在此基础上将二重开放作为整体,考虑其对产业集聚的影响。然后,考虑区际开放、国际开放以及二重开放与产业集聚之间的非线性关系。最后得出结论并提出政策建议。研究发现:内陆地区在开放过程中属于边缘区,因此开放程度越高,产业集聚水平越低;内陆地区的国际开放对产业集聚的促进作用小于区际开放对产业集聚的促进作用;内陆地区随着二重开放程度的提高,产业集聚水平存在先下降后上升的非线性关系。由于缺乏中国区际之间的劳动力和资本要素流动数据,构造的区际开放指标无法准确反映区际开放情况,因此分析二重开放对产业集聚影响时可能存在偏差,这是本文的不足之处,也是未来的研究方向之一。
[Abstract]:The relationship between regional industrial agglomeration and openness is one of the hot issues in academic research in recent years. Most researchers are concerned with international openness, the international opening of coastal areas, the dual opening of coastal areas, and less with the issues of international and interregional openness and industrial agglomeration in inland areas. Few people study the industrial agglomeration in inland areas as a whole. On the basis of previous studies, this paper takes Guizhou Province as an example to study the effects of dual opening in inland areas on industrial agglomeration from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. By combing the existing literature at home and abroad, we understand the mechanism between openness and industrial agglomeration, and put forward three hypotheses in this paper. One is that the inland area belongs to the marginal area in the process of opening up, so the higher the degree of international openness, the higher the degree of international openness. The lower the level of industrial agglomeration, the lower the promotion effect of international opening to industrial agglomeration in inland area is less than that of interregional opening to industrial agglomeration. Third, there is a first step between the dual opening degree and industrial agglomeration in inland area. The nonlinear relation of rising after falling. This paper selects four inter-regional opening indexes, constructs the inter-regional openness index by principal component analysis, and constructs the international opening index by using the proportion of foreign direct investment and foreign trade dependence index. The paper describes the level of industrial agglomeration through the index of Hefendal and the Gini coefficient of space. The present situation and development trend of industrial agglomeration, international openness and inter-regional openness in this inland area of Guizhou Province are reflected by using quantitative indexes. And through the basic statistics and correlation coefficient of these indicators, the paper makes a preliminary intuitive analysis of dual opening and industrial agglomeration. Secondly, it considers the impact of opening up and interregional opening on industrial agglomeration, respectively. On this basis, the dual opening is considered as a whole, and its impact on industrial agglomeration is considered. The nonlinear relationship between international opening and dual opening and industrial agglomeration. Finally, the conclusion is drawn and the policy recommendations are put forward. The study finds that the inland area belongs to the edge area in the process of opening up, so the higher the opening degree, the lower the level of industrial agglomeration; The promotion effect of international opening to industrial agglomeration in inland area is less than that of interregional opening to industrial agglomeration. The industrial agglomeration level has the nonlinear relationship of decreasing first and then rising. Due to the lack of data on the flow of labor and capital elements between regions in China, the inter-regional opening index can not accurately reflect the inter-regional opening situation. Therefore, it is the deficiency of this paper and one of the research directions in the future to analyze the influence of dual opening on industrial agglomeration.
【学位授予单位】:贵州财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F127
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵婷;赵伟;;FDI异质性、产业集聚与东道国产业效率——基于中国72个行业的实证分析[J];浙江学刊;2015年05期
2 赵伟;隋月红;;集聚类型、劳动力市场特征与工资—生产率差异[J];经济研究;2015年06期
3 张颖熙;夏杰长;;区域市场开放与地区服务业增长——基于省级面板数据的动态分析[J];产业经济研究;2013年05期
4 杨仁发;;产业集聚与地区工资差距——基于我国269个城市的实证研究[J];管理世界;2013年08期
5 赵伟;王春晖;;区域开放与产业集聚:一个基于交易费用视角的模型[J];国际贸易问题;2013年07期
6 张应武;;中国省区市场开放:测度、特征及其政策含义[J];首都经济贸易大学学报;2011年05期
7 张萃;赵伟;;制造业集聚、集聚经济与区域制造业发展——基于浙江与广东的比较分析[J];浙江学刊;2011年02期
8 杨庆育;李明;;基于灰色关联分析法的区域自主创新能力实证测度——以重庆市为例[J];软科学;2011年01期
9 张应武;李小瑛;;中国省区市场整合测度及其俱乐部整合特征[J];南方经济;2010年09期
10 周茂荣;张子杰;;对外开放度测度研究述评[J];国际贸易问题;2009年08期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张萃;“二重开放”与中国制造业区域集聚:理论与实证[D];浙江大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 高博;河南省开放型经济发展战略研究[D];郑州大学;2007年
,本文编号:1517962
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/chanyejingjilunwen/1517962.html