制度环境对战略性新兴产业创新能力的影响研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 04:34

  本文选题：制度环境 + 战略性新兴产业　； 参考：《中南民族大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：约瑟夫·熊彼特于1912年发表的《经济发展理论》中明确阐述了创新才是国家经济发展的根本动力,罗伯特·莫顿·索罗也在1957年发表的《技术变革与总量函数》中指出技术创新对经济增长率的重要贡献。改革开放三十多年,我国粗犷式的经济发展方式急需转变,随着我国经济进入“三期叠加”的历史时期,在当前经济的新常态下,调整产业结构,大力发展战略性新兴产业,转变经济增长方式,提高企业自主创新能力已成必然,而制度环境是产业发展的重要保障(吴敬琏,1999)。这就需要充分厘清当前我国制度环境对战略性新兴产业创新能力的影响,进而优化我国的制度环境,推动战略性新兴产业实现转型升级,提高自主创新能力,推动我国早日成为创新型国家。本文主要从制度环境对战略性新兴产业创新能力的影响角度出发,首先对国内外制度环境和企业创新能力的相关研究文献进行梳理归纳,探究制度环境对企业创新能力的作用机理,进而构建我国战略性新兴产业创新能力评价模型,从投入能力、运营能力、盈利能力和产出绩效能力四个维度诠释我国战略性新兴产业的创新能力。其次,根据North(1994)对制度环境的界定,将制度环境分为政策环境和市场环境,分别构建政策环境对战略性新兴产业创新能力影响模型和市场环境对战略性新兴产业创新能力影响模型。运用2009年到2013年间356家战略性新兴产业上市企业的面板数据作为研究样本,通过单位根、协整、Redundant检验最终得到回归结果。结果表明人力资本水平(EDU)、银行金融水平(BS)、技术市场发展水平(TMD)对战略性新兴产业创新能力成正比,而政府直接扶持水平(INTERV)、非银行金融水平(NBS)、税收水平(TAX)对战略性新兴产业创新能力成反比。再次,借鉴2003年国家发展研究中心对我国经济区域的划分方法,实证证明,北部、东部、南部沿海地区的市场环境要优于其他地区,而其他经济区域相比较市场环境,政策环境更加优越。最后,考虑到我国各省域制度环境的差异,分别对各省域进行实证研究,结果表明,辽宁、天津等教育环境较好,辽宁、江苏、山东等法律环境较好,北京、广东税收环境较好,福建、河南金融环境较好,广东、福建的技术市场环境较好。
[Abstract]:Joseph Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development, published in 1912, clearly states that innovation is the fundamental driving force for a country's economic development. Robert Morton Soro also pointed out the important contribution of technological innovation to economic growth rate in 1957. More than 30 years of reform and opening up, our country's rugged mode of economic development is in urgent need of transformation. As our economy enters the historical period of "three phases superposition", under the new normal of the current economy, we should adjust the industrial structure and vigorously develop strategic emerging industries. It is inevitable to change the mode of economic growth and improve the ability of independent innovation of enterprises, and the institutional environment is an important guarantee for the development of industry (Wu Jinglian). It is necessary to fully clarify the impact of the current institutional environment on the innovation ability of strategic emerging industries, and then optimize the institutional environment of our country, promote the transformation and upgrading of strategic emerging industries, and improve the ability of independent innovation. Promote our country to become an innovative country at an early date. From the perspective of the influence of the institutional environment on the innovation ability of strategic emerging industries, this paper firstly summarizes the relevant research literature on the institutional environment and the innovation ability of enterprises at home and abroad. This paper explores the mechanism of institutional environment on the innovation ability of enterprises, and then constructs the evaluation model of innovation ability of strategic emerging industries in China, from the perspective of input ability and operation ability, The four dimensions of profitability and output performance ability explain the innovation ability of China's strategic emerging industries. Secondly, according to the definition of institutional environment, the institutional environment is divided into policy environment and market environment. The influence models of policy environment on innovation ability of strategic emerging industries and market environment on innovation ability of strategic emerging industries are constructed respectively. Using the panel data of 356 listed companies in strategic emerging industries from 2009 to 2013 as the research sample, the regression results are obtained through the unit root, cointegration and Redundant test. The results show that the level of human capital, the level of banking and finance, and the level of technology market development are directly proportional to the innovation ability of strategic emerging industries. And the level of direct government support is inversely proportional to the innovation ability of strategic emerging industries, and the level of non-bank finance is higher than that of NBSU, and the level of tax revenue is higher than that of TAX. Thirdly, drawing lessons from the national development research center's method of dividing our country's economic regions in 2003, the empirical results show that the market environment in the north, east and south coastal areas is better than that in other regions, while other economic regions compare with the market environment The policy environment is better. Finally, taking into account the differences in the institutional environment of different provinces in China, the empirical research is carried out on each province. The results show that the educational environment of Liaoning and Tianjin is better, the legal environment of Liaoning, Jiangsu and Shandong is better, Beijing, Guangdong tax environment is better, Fujian, Henan financial environment is better, Guangdong, Fujian technology market environment is better.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F276.44;F273.1
，

本文编号：1790492