高技术产业集群外部性效应差异研究——基于2009—2014年省级面板数据的分析

发布时间：2018-04-25 17:50

本文选题：高技术产业集群 + 外部性　；参考：《中国科技论坛》2017年06期

【摘要】：本文利用2009—2014年省级面板数据对中国不同高技术产业集群三种外部性效应的差异进行研究,结果发现:(1)医药制造业的MAR溢出对产业发展带来负面影响,Jacobs溢出推动产业的发展,Porter溢出对产业发展影响不显著;(2)电子及通信设备制造业的MAR溢出对产业发展带来负面影响,Jacobs溢出效应不显著,同时Porter溢出对该行业发展起到促进作用;(3)计算机及办公设备制造业MAR溢出效应为正,但是该行业不存在Jacobs溢出,同时Porter溢出效应为正;(4)医疗设备及仪器仪表制造业的MAR溢出对产业发展带来负面影响,Jacobs溢出效应为正,Porter溢出影响效应不显著。文中对上述结果进行了总结分析,指出差异化结论的原因所在,并对各高技术产业集群发展提出政策建议。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we use the provincial panel data from 2009-2014 to study the differences of three externalities in different high-tech industrial clusters in China. The results show that: 1) the MAR spillover of pharmaceutical manufacturing industry has a negative impact on industrial development; MAR spillover of electronic and communication equipment industry has no significant impact on industrial development; MAR spillover of electronic and communications equipment manufacturing industry has brought about a negative impact on industrial development. The negative effect of Jacobs spillover effect was not significant. At the same time, Porter spillovers play a positive role in promoting the development of the industry. (3) the MAR spillover effect of computer and office equipment manufacturing industry is positive, but there is no Jacobs spillover in this industry. At the same time, the Porter spillover effect is positive. (4) the MAR spillover effect of medical equipment and instrument manufacturing industry has negative impact on the industry development. The MAR spillover effect of Porter spillover effect is not significant. This paper summarizes and analyzes the above results, points out the reasons for the conclusion of differentiation, and puts forward some policy suggestions for the development of high-tech industrial clusters.
【作者单位】：北卡罗来纳州立大学管理学院;广东外语外贸大学经济贸易学院;湖南文理学院经济与管理学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目“传递、吸收与再创新:国际技术溢出作用我国高技术产业的演化路径分析”(14YJC790091) 广东省大学生创新创业计划项目“多渠道技术溢出空间逻辑、溢出门槛与自主创新模式的研究”(201611846008)
【分类号】：F276.44

【相似文献】