仪器仪表产业发展指标体系研究
[Abstract]:The evaluation of index system, as a scientific method to understand things in an all-round way, has been paid more and more attention in recent years. Its research scope involves many aspects such as theoretical support, technology, method and so on. Especially, it plays an important role in the evaluation of comprehensive national strength, the evaluation of industry development, the evaluation of economic policy and the evaluation of development planning. In scientific evaluation, it is possible to measure simple problems with a single variable, while for complex problems, multiple variables are needed to measure them, and even a hierarchical variable system is needed to measure them. According to incomplete statistics, there are more than 3 million papers on index system research in our country since 1994. However, there are few papers on index system research in instrument field. This research is a blank in instrument field. In this paper, the construction, evaluation and weight of the index system of instrument industry are studied, and the current situation of instrument field at home and abroad as well as the development process of instrument industry in industrial developed countries are fully studied. The development data of instrument industry in major industrial developed countries are analyzed. On the basis of the determination of dimension, output and relative weight of index and the method of index selection, the evaluation index system of instrument industry is constructed. In this paper, the index system of instrument industry is used to evaluate the development level of instrument industry in some countries and compare with the industrial development of our country. Through the analysis of data, the influence of comprehensive index system index and various factors on the development process of instrument industry and the existing problems in different development stages are obtained, and the adjustment and optimization of industrial structure and the implementation of innovation-driven strategy are put forward. To improve product quality and benefit, to support green and sustainable development policy recommendations, and to promote the deep integration of industry informatization and industrialization, to promote the strategic transition to a powerful instrument manufacturing country, To shorten the gap between China's instrument industry and international developed countries to provide a reference.
【学位授予单位】:天津大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F426.46
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘仁;卞树檀;于强;;评估指标体系构建的方法研究[J];电子设计工程;2013年01期
2 李平;王钦;贺俊;吴滨;;中国制造业可持续发展指标体系构建及目标预测[J];中国工业经济;2010年05期
3 李远远;云俊;;综合评价指标体系构建“优度”评价研究[J];武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版);2010年01期
4 李远远;云俊;;多属性综合评价指标体系理论综述[J];武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版);2009年02期
5 赵阳华;;我国仪器仪表产业发展现状、问题及政策研究[J];中国仪器仪表;2009年03期
6 奚家成;;经济调整形势下的仪器仪表工业——2008年1~8月仪器仪表行业经济运行态势分析[J];中国仪器仪表;2009年01期
7 丁雷;车彦巍;;粗糙集方法在优化煤炭企业信息化评价指标体系中的应用[J];中国煤炭;2008年01期
8 李运胜;;对现阶段我国工业自动化仪器仪表行业的展望[J];中国高新技术企业;2008年02期
9 蔡炜凌;黄元生;;基于信息熵供应链评价指标约简的研究[J];科技创新导报;2007年36期
10 陈洪涛;周德群;黄国良;;基于粗糙集理论的企业效绩评价指标属性约简[J];计算机应用研究;2007年12期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李远远;基于粗糙集的指标体系构建及综合评价方法研究[D];武汉理工大学;2009年
2 苏为华;多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D];厦门大学;2000年
,本文编号:2431040
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/chanyejingjilunwen/2431040.html