当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 电子商务论文 >

论类型化视角下电商交易平台注意义务

发布时间:2018-03-25 12:02

  本文选题:电商交易平台 切入点:注意义务 出处:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着电商交易平台的多元化及综合化,法律对其的规定不足以适用于各类具体的情形,如对电商交易平台注意义务界定相对粗糙,是否违反注意义务作为电商交易平台侵权的重要认定标准,却没有一个具体明确的条文来划定电商交易平台的注意义务,究其根源,在于电商交易平台业务模式的多样化及内容的综合化。《侵权责任法》对电商交易平台的具体规定不明确,而相关行业标准也仅对电商平台的基本功能及内容做了简要概括,除此之外,对于电商交易平台注意义务的判断多停留在司法实务及理论研究层面。不同类型的电商交易平台所承担的注意义务应当有所差异,以异质性所涉及的不同因素作为判断要件,对电商交易平台注意义务的范围做不同类型的讨论。本文分四个部分进行电商交易平台注意义务的类型化分析。第一部分为电商交易平台注意义务概说。该部分从电商交易平台的法律定位入手,讨论当下电商交易发展水平下电商交易平台的应有之义,并分析电商交易平台的基本法律构成,结合相关注意义务的法律渊源,探讨电商交易平台注意义务的范围及扩张。第二部分为电商交易平台注意义务类型化的合理性思考。该部分基于现有标准的局限讨论类型化注意义务的必要性以及现实可行性,在必要性方面主要提出了电商交易平台注意义务类型化的现实需求、对降低维权成本的需要及实现利益平衡等因素;在现实可行性方面分析了当前电商交易平台业务模式的多样化及交易标的的差异性。第三部分为电商交易平台注意义务类型化原则与基础。该部分首先提出电商交易平台注意义务类型化的原则,在前两部分理论论证类型化注意义务的基础上,结合现实发展状况,对比了电商交易平台之间的相同点和不同点。第四部分为类型化的电商交易平台注意义务。确立类型化注意义务的标准,在此基础上将电商交易平台的注意义务范围进行具体划分;并提出类型化电商交易平台注意义务具有的两种作用。
[Abstract]:With the diversification and integration of e-commerce trading platforms, the legal provisions on them are not sufficient to apply to various specific situations, such as the relatively rough definition of the duty of care of e-commerce trading platforms. Whether the breach of duty of care is an important criterion for the infringement of e-commerce trading platforms, but there is no specific and clear provision to delineate the duty of care of e-commerce trading platforms, so as to investigate the root causes. The reason lies in the diversification of the business model and the integration of the content of the e-commerce trading platform. The specific provisions of the platform are not clear in the Tort liability Law, and the relevant industry standards only briefly generalize the basic functions and contents of the platform. In addition, the judgment of the duty of care of the e-commerce trading platform mostly stays at the level of judicial practice and theoretical research. The duty of care undertaken by different types of e-commerce trading platforms should be different. Taking the different factors involved in heterogeneity as the judgment elements, This paper is divided into four parts to analyze the types of the duty of care of the platform. The first part is an overview of the duty of care of the electronic trading platform. Starting with the legal orientation of the e-commerce trading platform, This paper discusses the proper meaning of e-commerce trading platform under the current level of e-commerce transaction development, and analyzes the basic legal structure of e-commerce trading platform, combining with the legal origin of relevant duty of care. This part discusses the scope and expansion of the duty of care of e-commerce trading platform. The second part discusses the necessity and feasibility of the type of duty of care based on the limitations of existing standards. In the aspect of necessity, the paper puts forward the realistic demand of the type of duty of care, the need to reduce the cost of protecting the rights and the realization of the balance of interests, etc. In the aspect of practical feasibility, the paper analyzes the diversification of the business model and the difference of the trading target of the current e-commerce trading platform. The third part is the principle and foundation of the type of duty of care of the e-commerce trading platform. Firstly, this part puts forward the principle and foundation of the e-commerce. The trading platform pays attention to the principle of obligation typing, On the basis of the first two parts of the theoretical argumentation of the type of duty of care, combined with the development of reality, The fourth part is the duty of care of the type of e-commerce trading platform. Establish the standard of the type of duty of care. On this basis, the scope of duty of care of e-commerce trading platform is divided concretely, and the two functions of the duty of care of typed e-commerce trading platform are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 周荆;杨琳;;网络交易平台民事责任的类型化研究[J];人民司法(应用);2016年34期

2 林承铎;安妮塔;;数字版权语境下避风港规则与红旗原则的适用[J];电子知识产权;2016年07期

3 李士林;;论网络服务提供者注意义务的设定[J];电子知识产权;2016年05期

4 何炼红;邓欣欣;;“互联网+”时代我国电子商务平台法律定位之反思[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2016年01期

5 杨立新;;网络交易平台提供者民法地位之展开[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年01期

6 张富强;许健聪;;完善我国著作权惩罚性赔偿立法的思考——基于法经济学“效益最大化原则”的分析[J];知识产权;2015年08期

7 刘风景;;法律原则的结构与功能——基于窗户隐喻的阐释[J];江汉论坛;2015年04期

8 张梦夏;;网络交易平台提供者的义务与责任——基于消费者保护的视角[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2014年04期

9 林沈纬;;网络交易平台提供商的注意义务认定研究——以淘宝网为例,商标间接侵权认定为中心[J];前沿;2013年19期

10 石必胜;;网络服务提供者的事前知识产权审查义务[J];电子知识产权;2013年09期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 张伟刚;;网络服务提供者的合理注意义务分析[N];人民法院报;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 朱凯超;论网络服务提供者的实质审查义务[D];吉林大学;2015年

2 王蕾;网络侵权中网络服务提供者注意义务的认定[D];宁波大学;2015年

3 朱敬知;淘宝模式下C2C网络购物合同若干法律问题研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年



本文编号:1663031

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/dianzishangwulunwen/1663031.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户da4e7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com