我国购物网站商标间接侵权问题探析

发布时间：2018-05-13 04:29

本文选题：购物网站 + 商标侵权　；参考：《福州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着网络购物这种全新的电子商务模式的兴起,伴随而来的是更多的法律问题亟待解决。购物网站在第三方商标侵权中的责任认定问题,便是其中这一。传统的共同侵权理论在解决此类案件时,出现了许多困惑,也导致了司法实践的混乱。《商标法》第三次修订,虽然确立了“间接侵权”制度,但却过于简单和粗糙,不便于在司法实践中的适用。以平衡商标权人和购物网站的利益为出发点,借鉴国外先进的立法,合理界定购物网站在第三方商标侵权中的责任,进而对我国商标间接侵权制度的完善加以探析,是本文的研究目的。认定购物网站的权利、义务和责任,界定其正确的法律地位是前提。将购物网站按照B2B、B2C、C2C、O2O进行分类,并不能清楚地界定购物网站的地位。而根据购物网站是自主销售产品,还是仅提供平台服务,亦或是混合经营,则可以很好地界定其法律地位。“通知与删除”程序作为购物网站的免责条款,实践中却等于是非常具体地规定了网络服务商的有限注意义务,对购物网站适用合理注意义务,并不会对购物网站造成过重的负担,却可以减少网络商标侵权纠纷的产生。商标间接侵权行为存在多种表现形式,不同的主体、不同的商业模型和不同的技术模式都影响着合理注意义务、主观过错和免责事由的判定。因此立法中应明确购物网站商标侵权的构成要件,细化其注意义务和免责事由,强化其民事责任承担。本文主要采用比较研究、理论分析、实证分析的方法,分五部分探讨我国购物网站商标间接侵权问题。第一部分介绍了国内两起关于购物网站商标侵权的典型案例,从中发现目前我国关于此类案件审判中存在的问题。第二部分从法理上分析了购物网站商标侵权问题。从正确界定购物网站的法律地位入手,阐述了购物网站承担侵权责任的法理依据,从而为购物网站设定了一系列的注意义务。第三部分将国内外关于购物网站商标间接侵权的立法进行比较。主要通过与美国和欧盟商标侵权的立法例进行比较,寻找我国目前立法存在的缺陷。第四部分是关于我国购物网站商标间接侵权责任分析。论述了“间接侵权理论”与“共同侵权理论”的区别、购物网站商标间接侵权的归责原则、构成要件、免责事由和责任承担。第五部分提出完善我国购物网站商标间接侵权的法律规制建议。
[Abstract]:With the rise of online shopping, more and more legal problems need to be solved. Shopping website in the third-party trademark infringement in the responsibility of the problem, is one of them. When the traditional joint tort theory solves this kind of cases, there appear many puzzles, which also lead to the confusion of judicial practice. The third revision of the Trademark Law establishes the system of "indirect infringement", but it is too simple and rough. It is not convenient to apply in judicial practice. In order to balance the interests of trademark owners and shopping websites, draw lessons from foreign advanced legislation, reasonably define the responsibility of shopping websites in the third party trademark infringement, and then probe into the perfection of the system of indirect trademark infringement in our country. It is the purpose of this paper. Determining the rights, obligations and responsibilities of shopping websites and defining their correct legal status are prerequisites. The classification of shopping websites according to B2BX B2CU C2CO2O does not clearly define the status of shopping websites. The legal status of shopping websites can be defined according to whether they sell their products independently or provide only platform services or mixed operation. "Notification and deletion" procedure is regarded as an exemption clause for shopping websites, but in practice it is tantamount to specifying the limited duty of care of network service providers, and applying reasonable duty of care to shopping websites. Do not cause excessive burden on shopping websites, but can reduce the network trademark infringement disputes. There are many forms of indirect trademark infringement, different subjects, different business models and different technical models all affect the determination of reasonable duty of care, subjective fault and exemption. Therefore, the legislation should clarify the constituent elements of trademark infringement of shopping website, refine its duty of care and exoneration, and strengthen its civil liability. This article mainly uses the comparative research, the theory analysis, the demonstration analysis method, divides into five parts to discuss our country shopping website trademark indirect infringement question. The first part introduces two typical cases of trademark infringement on shopping websites in China. The second part analyzes the trademark infringement problem of shopping website. Starting with the correct definition of the legal status of shopping websites, this paper expounds the legal basis of the tort liability of shopping websites, and sets up a series of duty of care for shopping websites. The third part compares domestic and foreign legislation on indirect trademark infringement of shopping websites. By comparing with the legislation of trademark infringement in the United States and the European Union, this paper finds out the defects of the current legislation in our country. The fourth part is about our country shopping website trademark indirect tort liability analysis. This paper discusses the difference between "indirect tort theory" and "joint tort theory", the principle of imputation of indirect infringement of trademark on shopping website, the elements of constitution, the reason of exemption and the burden of liability. In the fifth part, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legal regulation of trademark indirect infringement on shopping websites in China.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】