论网络交易平台提供者的侵权责任

发布时间：2018-05-18 19:22

  本文选题：网络交易平台提供者 + 侵权责任　； 参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在互联网蓬勃发展的今天,电子商务改变了人们传统的生活方式。网络交易平台也随之兴起,它不仅为商家提供了广阔的平台,也为人们的生活带来了巨大的便利,成为了电子商务产业的重要组成部分。然而,在网络交易平台一片欣欣向荣的背后,网络交易平台提供者涉及的侵权事件也随着频频发生,这成为网络交易平台提供者面临的难以回避的局面。近几年,有很多热点侵权案件都是围绕着网络交易发生的。网络交易平台给人们生活带来便利的同时,也由于其特殊性而严重侵害了消费者的相关权益,如知情权、公平交易权等,增加了消费者的交易风险。由于网络交易平台商品或服务的提供者(以下称网络交易平台经营者)隐蔽性强的特点,使得消费者只能向网络交易平台提供者主张权利。因此近年来,网络交易平台经营者和平台提供者作为共同被告的诉讼案件屡见不鲜。在此趋势下,2013年《消费者权益保护法》(以下简称消保法)修改了第44条,对网络交易平台提供者的侵权责任做出规定,说明这一民事主体在我国法律中得到确认。由于网络交易平台提供者的具体情况不同,其承担的法律责任也不尽相同,有的承担侵权责任的同时,尚需承担行政责任、刑事责任,但本文重点探讨其侵权责任。虽然相关法律法规对其侵权责任进行了规定,但对于网络交易平台提供者的法律地位、法律义务、侵权责任等各方面的规定尚不具体或明确,造成司法实践中对法规的理解和适用出现了很多模糊地带,直接导致消费者维权艰难。本文试图总结现有学者对于网络交易平台提供者侵权责任的研究成果,通过分析、比较、归纳等方法,对相关问题进行系统的理论研究,以期明晰网络交易平台提供者的侵权责任。本文共分为四个章节。第一章通过论述网络交易平台提供者的概念及特征,分析其法律地位。第二章系统阐述了网络交易平台提供者的侵权行为。第三章从构成条件、归责原则、侵权责任形态这三个方面入手,探讨网络交易平台提供者的侵权责任。第四章分析讨论了国内外网络交易平台提供者侵权责任的立法现状和我国立法的不足,对完善我国网络交易平台提供者侵权责任的立法提出了建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the Internet, electronic commerce has changed people's traditional way of life. With the rise of network trading platform, it not only provides a broad platform for businesses, but also brings great convenience to people's lives, and becomes an important part of e-commerce industry. However, behind the flourishing of the network trading platform, the infringement incidents involving the network trading platform providers also occur frequently, which becomes the unavoidable situation that the network trading platform providers are faced with. In recent years, there are a lot of hot-spot infringement cases are around the network transactions. While the network trading platform brings convenience to people's life, because of its particularity, it seriously infringes on the related rights and interests of consumers, such as the right to know, the right to fair trade, and so on, which increases the transaction risk of consumers. Because of the strong concealment of the providers of goods or services (hereinafter referred to as the operators of the network trading platform), consumers can only claim the rights of the online trading platform providers. Therefore, in recent years, online trading platform operators and platform providers as joint defendants litigation cases are common. Under this trend, in 2013, the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law (hereinafter referred to as the Law on the Elimination of Insurance) amended Article 44 to stipulate the tort liability of the provider of the network trading platform, which indicates that this civil subject has been confirmed in the law of our country. Because the specific situation of the network trading platform provider is different, its legal liability is not the same, some assume tort liability, at the same time, still need to bear administrative responsibility, criminal responsibility, but this article focuses on its tort liability. Although the relevant laws and regulations provide for its tort liability, the legal status, legal obligations, tort liability and other aspects of the network trading platform provider are not specific or clear. In judicial practice, there are a lot of fuzzy areas in the understanding and application of laws and regulations, which directly lead to the difficulty of consumer rights. This paper attempts to summarize the existing scholars for network trading platform provider tort liability research results, through analysis, comparison, induction and other methods, related issues are systematically theoretical research. In order to clarify the network trading platform provider tort liability. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the concept and characteristics of network trading platform provider, and analyzes its legal status. The second chapter systematically expounds the infringement of network trading platform provider. The third chapter discusses the tort liability of the network trading platform provider from three aspects: the constitution condition, the liability principle and the form of tort liability. The fourth chapter analyzes and discusses the domestic and foreign network trading platform provider tort liability legislation status quo and the lack of legislation in our country, to improve our network trading platform provider tort liability legislation put forward suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前9条

1 杨立新;;网络交易平台提供者为消费者损害承担赔偿责任的法理基础[J];法学;2016年01期

2 杨立新;;网络平台提供者的附条件不真正连带责任与部分连带责任[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2015年01期

3 杨立新;韩煦;;网络交易平台提供者的法律地位与民事责任[J];江汉论坛;2014年05期

4 王斯滢;崔青青;;浅析网络团购主体法律关系及其违约责任认定[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年12期

5 吴汉东;;侵权责任法视野下的网络侵权责任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期

6 陈立思;;淘宝运营模式下的法律责任解析[J];中国商界(下半月);2010年05期

7 杨立新;;《侵权责任法》规定的网络侵权责任的理解与解释[J];国家检察官学院学报;2010年02期

8 张新宝;;侵权责任法立法的利益衡量[J];中国法学;2009年04期

9 吴仙桂;;网络交易平台的法律定位[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前2条

1 程凯;网络交易平台提供商侵权责任研究[D];湖南师范大学;2016年

2 鲁泠汐;网络交易平台提供者民事责任研究[D];大连海事大学;2015年

，

本文编号：1906904