民事诉讼电子数据的真实性认定

发布时间：2018-06-23 20:48

本文选题：电子数据 + 真实性　；参考：《西南政法大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着电子商务和信息技术的发展,电子数据作为一种独立的证据,日渐频繁的出现在民事诉讼及纠纷这一舞台上。如何对电子数据的真实性进行准确有效的认定是摆在电子数据应用领域中的一个问题。为使电子数据在在民事诉讼中发挥其作为证据应有的作用,对此问题,我们不能回避。相比于传统的物理证据等,客观性、合法性、关联性的特性自不必多说,电子数据还具有高科技性、内在无形性、外在多样性等独特之处。作为一种新型的证据,电子数据证据有其优势所在,也存在一般证据没有的弊端。因而,在电子数据证据采集、提取、保全、真实性的审查判断等过程中不可避免的会存在一定的问题。目前,美国、加拿大等英美法系国家通过制定成文和判例等手段,已建立起独特的电子数据认定规则,而我国在电子数据证据立法方面的进展则较为缓慢,在民事司法实践中也存在诸多问题。对此,我们应该参考借鉴美加等国相关的理论和实践经验,同时结合我国的实际情况,逐步构建起独立的民事诉讼电子数据真实性认证规则体系,并对相关的制度规范加以完善。通过对我国民事诉讼理论及立法层面和实践方面与认定电子数据真实性相关的问题进行探讨,进而提出完善法律规范,构建真实性认定体系,大力发展新技术,充分运用现有技术手段,构建第三方机构保全制度等建议助力于电子数据证据的审查判断环节,以应对目前司法实践中在电子数据真实性认定方面所面临的窘境,促进诉讼效率的提高,更好的认定案件事实并作出正确的裁判,便是本文的出发点和创新点。
[Abstract]:With the development of electronic commerce and information technology, electronic data, as a kind of independent evidence, appears more and more frequently on the stage of civil litigation and disputes. How to identify the authenticity of electronic data accurately and effectively is a problem in the field of electronic data application. In order to make electronic data play its due role as evidence in civil litigation, we can not avoid this problem. Compared with the traditional physical evidence, the characteristics of objectivity, legitimacy and relevance do not need to be said. Electronic data also has the characteristics of hi-tech, intangibility, external diversity and so on. As a new type of evidence, electronic data evidence has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, there will inevitably be some problems in the process of collecting, extracting, preserving, examining and judging the authenticity of electronic data evidence. At present, the United States, Canada and other Anglo-American legal system countries have established unique electronic data identification rules by means of writing and precedents, while our country has made slow progress in the legislation of electronic data evidence. There are also many problems in civil judicial practice. In this regard, we should refer to the relevant theories and practical experiences of the United States and Canada, and at the same time, gradually build up an independent system of authentication rules for the authenticity of electronic data in civil proceedings, taking into account the actual situation in our country. And to improve the relevant institutional norms. This paper discusses the problems related to the confirmation of the authenticity of electronic data in the aspects of civil litigation theory, legislation and practice in China, and then puts forward to perfect the legal norms, construct the authenticity identification system, and vigorously develop the new technology. Making full use of the existing technical means to construct the third party institution preservation system and other suggestions to help the examination and judgment of electronic data evidence, in order to deal with the current judicial practice in electronic data authenticity in the face of the dilemma, The starting point and innovation of this paper are to promote the improvement of litigation efficiency, to better identify the facts of the case and to make the correct judgment.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.13

【相似文献】