日本加入TPP对其农业的影响分析
[Abstract]:Since the United States formally led the TPP negotiations in 2010, TPP has been a hot issue of global concern for many years. Japan formally joined the TPP negotiations on July 23, 2013, and became the 12th member of the TPP. On February 4, 2016, 12 countries such as the United States, Japan and Australia formally signed the TPP Agreement. TPP was carried out under the leadership of the United States. It can be said that the TPP itself reflects the strategic intent of the United States. President Obama's announcement that his participation in the TPP talks has the support of most business groups in the United States is a testament to the fact that the TPP is in line with some of the goals of U.S. trade policy, especially with regard to the strategic intentions of the Asia-Pacific region. In terms of the content of TPP, the agreement not only includes liberalization agreements on trade in goods and services, but also covers liberalization of investment, rules of origin, labor rights and environmental protection, intellectual property rights, as well as traditional economic and trade agreements. Government procurement, tariff procedures, technical barriers to trade, e-commerce transactions and other non-traditional areas. For Japan, accession to the TPP is a decision made by the Japanese government from a comprehensive perspective. Joining TPP is helpful for Japan to boost exports and realize economic rejuvenation. But Japan only decided to participate in the TPP negotiations in 2013 because of Japan's agriculture, which is not a high proportion of GDP, but because of its important strategic role, it has always been protected in its trade agreements with other countries. Agriculture is basically a reserved item. If the TPP is agreed, a lot of cheap produce will be sold to Japan, and Japan's agricultural market could be destroyed, which is unacceptable to Japan. The Japanese government and the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries have tried out the impact of participating in the TPP on Japanese agriculture. In 2010, Estimates from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries show that joining the TPP would cost Japan 7.9 trillion Japanese dollars. On March 15, 2013, the figure fell to 2.96 trillion yen, according to the Japanese government's unified calculation. After the TPP was reached, the Japanese government thought the previous calculation was too pessimistic and should be recalculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Results according to the latest estimates released by the Japanese government on December 24, 2015, the impact on the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries was between 130 billion and 210 billion, and the impact could be negligible, taking into account the policy support of the Japanese government's agricultural policy. That is, whether the total production of agriculture, forestry and fishery industry or Japan's food self-sufficiency rate can remain unchanged. Based on the TPP agreement and the Japanese government's trial calculation, we can speculate that the impact of TPP on Japanese agriculture may lead to an increase in Japan's agricultural imports, a decrease in domestic production in Japan, a decline in the price of Japanese agricultural products, and a decline in the management willingness of agricultural practitioners. The market for agricultural products is more competitive, food safety rules will change. For the key agricultural products in Japan, the amount of rice production and output will not be affected under the measures of strengthening physique and managing stability. The yield of wheat will not change, but the output value of wheat may decrease to a certain extent because of the decline of wheat price, and the yield of barley will not change, and the output value of barley may decrease to a certain extent. The yield of beef, pork and dairy products will not change, but the output value may drop by a relatively large margin; the yield of sugar crops will not change, and the output value may drop by a small margin. Accession to the TPP is both an opportunity and a challenge for Japanese agriculture. Under the TPP rules, it will be more conducive to the reform of Japanese agriculture.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F331.3;F744
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩春花;;从农业视角探析韩国加入TPP的可行性[J];世界农业;2013年10期
2 徐秀军;;TPP谈判,各方揣着小算盘[J];世界知识;2013年22期
3 赵亮;;日本加入TPP谈判后中国战略机遇与挑战[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2013年04期
4 倪月菊;;中国如何应对TPP谈判[J];党政论坛(干部文摘);2013年07期
5 赵亮;;TPP谈判新进展与中国战略机遇分析[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2014年02期
6 熊李力;龙丝露;;日本加入TPP谈判的动机及其影响[J];现代国际关系;2013年09期
7 赵亮;;日本加入后TPP谈判的新动态与中国战略选择的思考[J];安阳师范学院学报;2013年06期
8 刘昌黎;;日本参加TPP谈判的动因、制约因素与政策措施[J];日本学刊;2011年01期
9 刘佳;;日本宣布加入TPP谈判[J];中国新时代;2013年04期
10 ;中国对美国推动的TPP要保持战略警惕[J];中国商人;2011年12期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 周冬梅;陈东明;王秀燕;张保忠;何天敬;辛厚文;刘凡镇;;固体H_4~(2+)TPP的共振Raman光谱研究[A];全国第六届分子振动光谱学术报告会文集[C];1990年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 吴正龙;日本加入TPP谈判之路不平坦[N];中国经济时报;2012年
2 吴洪英;墨西哥为何积极加盟TPP[N];经济日报;2012年
3 本报记者 陈大雪 江玮;TPP抑或“东盟+N”? 中美暗战区域自由贸易[N];21世纪经济报道;2013年
4 编译 丁咚 黄婧;美国企业力挺马来西亚加入TPP谈判[N];中国电子报;2014年
5 中国太平洋经济合作全国委员会秘书长 吴正龙;TPP:蒙着面纱的谈判[N];解放日报;2011年
6 驻马来西亚使馆经商处;马来西亚进行TPP谈判替代马美自贸谈判[N];国际商报;2011年
7 中国太平洋经济合作全国委员会副会长 吴正龙;日本为何难入TPP谈判[N];解放日报;2012年
8 梁宝卫 编译;日本面对TPP应有长远眼光[N];上海证券报;2012年
9 中国太平洋经济合作全国委员会副会长 吴正龙;TPP谈判为何久拖不决[N];解放日报;2013年
10 记者 刘军国;日本正式宣布加入TPP谈判[N];人民日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 石浔;美国跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)对于东北亚区域经济合作的影响[D];辽宁大学;2015年
2 蒋阳阳;国际知识产权保护新动向:《TPP协定》及其对我国国际贸易的影响分析[D];南京财经大学;2014年
3 张连成;TPP协议中知识产权保护标准研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
4 刘娟;美国主导的TPP谈判及其对中国的影响[D];吉林大学;2016年
5 赵文丽;TPP公司医疗技术软件试点项目口译实践报告[D];南京师范大学;2016年
6 朱丽娜;TPP协议中的知识产权条款分析[D];湖南大学;2016年
7 葛琛;增加值视角下中国制造业在TPP区域内的贸易竞争力分析[D];湖南大学;2016年
8 许耿炜;TPP视角下的投资准入负面清单研究[D];华侨大学;2017年
9 张飚;澳大利亚参与TPP谈判的原因和挑战分析[D];外交学院;2015年
10 邢路明;日本参加泛太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)谈判的政策与前景[D];吉林大学;2014年
,本文编号:2327124
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/dianzishangwulunwen/2327124.html