“一带一路”下OFDI的产业升级效应研究
本文关键词:“一带一路”下OFDI的产业升级效应研究 出处:《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目前,中国经济增速逐步放缓,经济发展进入新常态,中国制造业一方面面临劳动力等生产成本的上涨,另一方面面临产能过剩的困境。中国经济亟需转移国内的过剩产能,实现经济结构的转型与升级。自从"一带一路"提出以来,我国对"一带一路"沿线国家的OFDI增长迅速,对外直接投资已经成为中国企业参与"一带一路"和进行国际产能合作的重要形式。提出"一带一路"战略已三年有余,"一带一路"是否对中国经济产生了影响?在"一带一路"下"走出去"的中国资本会如何推动中国的产业升级?这些问题都亟需研究。本先文从理论层面分析了"一带一路"下OFDI促进中国产业升级的影响路径,即边际产业转移效应和逆向技术溢出效应。本文随后在理论模型中用全要素生产率的变化来刻画逆向技术溢出效应,用折旧率的变化来刻画边际产业转移效应,并对"一带一路"实施前后产业升级的速度进行了比较静态分析。模型推导发现,"一带一路"下OFDI会通过边际产业转移效应和逆向技术溢出效应推动中国的产业升级。同时,本文基于2011-2015年137家参与"一带一路"的上市公司的面板数据,利用倾向得分匹配(PSM)和倍差法(DID)研究了"一带一路"下的OFDI对中国产业升级的影响,同时还分地区、分所有制对数据进行了研究。主要实证结论如下:(1)"一带一路"下的0FDI对中国产业升级有显著的正向作用,能够提高企业的劳动生产率,促进产业结构优化。(2)"一带一路"下各地区的对外直接投资对产业升级的推动作用存在差异,存在"东部强于中西部"的现象,但无法识别中西部哪个地区"一带一路"下OFDI的产业升级效应更强。(3)"一带一路"下不同所有制企业的对外直接投资对产业升级的推动作用存在差异,存在"民营企业强于公有制企业、外资企业不显著"的现象。本文最后还根据模型结论和实证结果给出了政策建议。
[Abstract]:At present, China's economic growth is gradually slowing, economic development has entered a new normal, China's manufacturing industry on the one hand faces rising production costs such as labor. On the other hand, it faces the dilemma of overcapacity. China's economy urgently needs to transfer its domestic excess capacity to realize the transformation and upgrading of its economic structure. China's OFDI to countries along "Belt and Road" is growing rapidly. Foreign direct investment (FDI) has become an important form for Chinese enterprises to participate in "Belt and Road" and carry out international capacity cooperation. It has been more than three years since the "Belt and Road" strategy was put forward. Has Belt and Road had an impact on China's economy? How will Chinese capital "go out" under "Belt and Road" promote China's industrial upgrading? All these problems need to be studied. This paper analyzes the influence path of OFDI to promote China's industrial upgrading under "Belt and Road" from the theoretical level. This paper uses the change of total factor productivity to describe the reverse technology spillover effect in the theoretical model and the marginal industrial transfer effect with the change of depreciation rate. And the "Belt and Road" before and after the implementation of the industrial upgrading of the speed of comparative static analysis. Model derivation found. Under "Belt and Road", OFDI will promote China's industrial upgrading through marginal industrial transfer effect and reverse technology spillover effect. This paper is based on panel data of 137 listed companies involved in Belt and Road from 2011 to 2015. The influence of OFDI under "Belt and Road" on China's industrial upgrading is studied by using the propensity score matching (PSM) and the double difference method (DIDD). At the same time, it is divided into regions. The main empirical conclusions are as follows: (1) "Belt and Road" has a significant positive effect on China's industrial upgrading, and can improve the labor productivity of enterprises. Promote the optimization of industrial structure. 2) under "Belt and Road", there are differences in the role of foreign direct investment to promote industrial upgrading in different regions, and there is a phenomenon that "the east is stronger than the central and western regions". However, it is impossible to identify which region in the Midwest, "Belt and Road", has a stronger industrial upgrading effect under "Belt and Road".). Under "Belt and Road", there are differences in the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) of different ownership enterprises in promoting industrial upgrading. There is a phenomenon that "private enterprises are stronger than public enterprises, but foreign-funded enterprises are not significant". Finally, the policy suggestions are given according to the conclusions of the model and the empirical results.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F832.6;F121.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 华欣;盛红艳;;中国制造业企业对“一带一路”国家OFDI模式选择的实证分析[J];工业技术经济;2016年10期
2 陈伟光;郭晴;;中国对“一带一路”沿线国家投资的潜力估计与区位选择[J];宏观经济研究;2016年09期
3 张亚斌;;“一带一路”投资便利化与中国对外直接投资选择——基于跨国面板数据及投资引力模型的实证研究[J];国际贸易问题;2016年09期
4 贾妮莎;申晨;;中国对外直接投资的制造业产业升级效应研究[J];国际贸易问题;2016年08期
5 李计广;钊锐;张彩云;;我国对“一带一路”国家投资潜力分析——基于随机前沿模型[J];亚太经济;2016年04期
6 马述忠;刘梦恒;;中国在“一带一路”沿线国家OFDI的第三国效应研究:基于空间计量方法[J];国际贸易问题;2016年07期
7 田泽;许东梅;;我国对“一带一路”重点国家OFDI效率综合评价——基于超效率DEA和Malmquist指数[J];经济问题探索;2016年06期
8 许小平;陆靖;李江;;签订双边投资协定对中国OFDI的影响——基于“一带一路”沿线国家的实证研究[J];工业技术经济;2016年05期
9 田泽;许东梅;;我国对“一带一路”沿线国家的投资效率与对策[J];经济纵横;2016年05期
10 孟庆强;;中国对“一带一路”沿线国家直接投资动机的实证研究[J];工业经济论坛;2016年02期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 俞佳根;中国对外直接投资的产业结构升级效应研究[D];辽宁大学;2016年
2 霍忻;中国对外直接投资逆向技术溢出的产业结构升级效应研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2016年
3 遇芳;中国对外直接投资的产业升级效应研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2013年
4 刘源超;发展中国家对外直接投资的理论与模式研究[D];北京大学;2008年
5 王英;中国对外直接投资的产业结构调整效应研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 詹玲;金融机构发展对我国对外直接投资的影响[D];暨南大学;2016年
2 陈美池;中国对外直接投资对产业升级的影响[D];北京交通大学;2016年
3 张小鹿;中国对外直接投资与产业结构升级[D];天津师范大学;2016年
4 黄卫冬;东道国制度质量对中国对外直接投资的影响[D];广东外语外贸大学;2016年
5 曹振燕;制度差异在中国对"一路"国家OFDI中的影响研究[D];山东财经大学;2016年
6 陈后祥;“一带一路”背景下东道国基础设施[夜鶲FDI区位选择影响研究[D];浙江工商大学;2016年
,本文编号:1380688
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/huobiyinxinglunwen/1380688.html