国际金融中心异质性人力资本投资效率研究
[Abstract]:Different from the previous research on the construction of international financial center in China from the macro perspective of international comparison, as well as the existing international financial center of the historical experience of the methods for reference, This paper studies the disparity between Shanghai and five international financial centers, namely New York, London, Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo, from the perspective of heterogeneous investment efficiency of human capital. This paper tries to provide some suggestions on the construction of Shanghai's international financial center from the aspect of heterogeneous human capital investment. Firstly, on the basis of summarizing the previous theories of human capital, this paper divides the investment of human capital into three types: basic type, knowledge-skill type and institutional type from the perspective of heterogeneous human capital investment combined with the actual situation. The interaction mechanism between heterogeneous human capital investment and financial center construction is also demonstrated. Secondly, through the standardization of the cross-sectional data of the five international financial center cities and Shanghai from 2011 to 2013, By using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with DEA model, the differences of investment degree and efficiency of three kinds of heterogeneous human capital in different financial center cities are obtained, and the different functions of three kinds of heterogeneous human capital in the construction of international financial center are analyzed. It is found that there is a big gap in the investment of knowledge-based and institutional human capital between Shanghai and the five major financial center cities. From this, this article thinks Shanghai needs to do a good job 3: 1. Increase heterogeneous human capital investment. To improve the investment efficiency of heterogeneous human capital. Coordinate relations with other financial centres in the country.
【学位授予单位】:兰州财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F832.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴弘;;上海国际金融中心建设的制度创新[J];法学;2016年09期
2 刘萌;;上海市建设国际金融中心问题研究[J];经济研究导刊;2016年17期
3 史广龙;;上海建设国际金融中心应在重点领域和关键环节实现突破[J];经济纵横;2016年05期
4 肖志富;;国际金融中心人才特征及上海金融人才战略[J];福建金融;2015年04期
5 霍颖;刘锋;;建设上海国际金融中心的制约因素分析[J];商场现代化;2015年09期
6 孙国茂;范跃进;;金融中心的本质、功能与路径选择[J];管理世界;2013年11期
7 冯军政;;全球金融中心格局演变与上海的发展策略研究[J];新金融;2013年07期
8 冯晓;朱彦元;杨茜;;基于人力资本分布方差的中国国民经济生产函数研究[J];经济学(季刊);2012年02期
9 单豪杰;马龙官;;国际金融中心的形成机制——理论解释及一个新的分析框架[J];世界经济研究;2010年10期
10 吴晓求;;中国构建国际金融中心的路径探讨[J];金融研究;2010年08期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 胡晓绵;教育、健康与我国经济增长研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
2 苏立峰;全球金融中心演进规律的实证研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 贺卓媛;借自贸区契机推进上海国际金融中心建设研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2016年
2 蒋木子;中国金融服务贸易国际竞争力分析[D];东北财经大学;2012年
3 张艳;金融中心竞争力影响因素和上海国际金融中心建设[D];复旦大学;2011年
4 李梦巍;上海国际金融中心建设的影响因素分析[D];同济大学;2008年
5 蔡小贞;香港和新加坡国际金融中心竞争态势分析:1980-2005[D];华东师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:2181354
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/huobiyinxinglunwen/2181354.html