环境污染事故成本计量方法研究
发布时间:2018-07-27 20:37
【摘要】:当前我国经济迅猛发展,随之而来的是环境问题日益突出。环境污染事故的频繁发生,造成了环境质量的急剧恶化,同时,伴随着巨大的经济损失,这些损失如何在造成事故的主体——企业中体现,即环境污染事故成本的计量问题。环境污染事故的经济损失已经作为核算要素进入了国民经济核算体系。环境污染事故成本计量不仅仅是可持续发展战略的要求,也有利于企业降低环境污染事故的风险。 我国在环境污染成本方面尚未开展深入和系统的研究。环境污染成本的核算范围在学术界还存在一定的争议。对于环境污染事故的成本也没有统一的界定,实际予以估算和赔偿的范围局限于部分直接经济损失,,对于自然资源损害的价值没有确切的计量标准和切实可行的计量方法。 本文基于英国石油公司(BP)在墨西哥湾发生的漏油事故和康菲公司在渤海湾发生的漏油事故,对企业环境污染事故成本的计量方法进行了研究。首先,通过BP在墨西哥湾漏油事故之后年度财务报表中环境成本的披露与事故经济损失的对比,得出在美国的环境污染事故成本包含了污染预防成本、溢油应急成本、污染赔偿成本三方面的内容。在污染赔偿成本中包含了几乎所有的直接和间接损失。其次,通过BP墨西哥湾和康菲渤海湾漏油事故环境污染成本的对比,指出在我国的环境污染事故成本的核算范围应当包含事故造成的直接和间接损失,计量方法应该采用环境重置成本的方法。再次,本文提出了基于环境重置成本的环境污染事故成本计量方法,包括生境、生物多样性、渔业、旅游业和景观的计算方法,为环境污染事故成本的计量提供参考。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy in China, environmental problems are becoming more and more prominent. The frequent occurrence of environmental pollution accidents has caused a sharp deterioration of environmental quality. At the same time, with the huge economic losses, these losses are reflected in the main body of the accident-the enterprise, that is, the cost measurement of environmental pollution accidents. The economic loss of environmental pollution accident has entered the national accounting system as an accounting element. The cost measurement of environmental pollution accidents is not only the requirement of sustainable development strategy, but also conducive to reducing the risk of environmental pollution accidents. China has not carried out in-depth and systematic research on the cost of environmental pollution. The scope of environmental pollution cost accounting is still controversial in academic circles. There is no uniform definition of the cost of environmental pollution accident, the range of actual estimation and compensation is limited to some direct economic losses, and there is no exact measurement standard and practical measurement method for the value of natural resource damage. Based on the oil spill of (BP) in Gulf of Mexico and the oil spill of ConocoPhillips in Bohai Bay, the cost measurement method of environmental pollution accident is studied in this paper. First of all, by comparing the disclosure of environmental costs in BP's annual financial statements after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill with the economic loss of the accident, it is concluded that the cost of environmental pollution accidents in the United States includes the cost of pollution prevention, the cost of oil spill emergency. Pollution compensation costs in three aspects. Almost all direct and indirect losses are included in the pollution compensation costs. Secondly, by comparing the cost of environmental pollution caused by BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill and Conoco Bay oil spill, it is pointed out that the cost accounting scope of environmental pollution accident in China should include direct and indirect losses caused by the accident. The method of measurement should adopt the method of environment replacement cost. Thirdly, this paper puts forward the cost measurement method of environmental pollution accident based on environmental replacement cost, including habitat, biodiversity, fishery, tourism and landscape, which provides a reference for the cost measurement of environmental pollution accident.
【学位授予单位】:兰州商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:X507;F234
本文编号:2149071
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy in China, environmental problems are becoming more and more prominent. The frequent occurrence of environmental pollution accidents has caused a sharp deterioration of environmental quality. At the same time, with the huge economic losses, these losses are reflected in the main body of the accident-the enterprise, that is, the cost measurement of environmental pollution accidents. The economic loss of environmental pollution accident has entered the national accounting system as an accounting element. The cost measurement of environmental pollution accidents is not only the requirement of sustainable development strategy, but also conducive to reducing the risk of environmental pollution accidents. China has not carried out in-depth and systematic research on the cost of environmental pollution. The scope of environmental pollution cost accounting is still controversial in academic circles. There is no uniform definition of the cost of environmental pollution accident, the range of actual estimation and compensation is limited to some direct economic losses, and there is no exact measurement standard and practical measurement method for the value of natural resource damage. Based on the oil spill of (BP) in Gulf of Mexico and the oil spill of ConocoPhillips in Bohai Bay, the cost measurement method of environmental pollution accident is studied in this paper. First of all, by comparing the disclosure of environmental costs in BP's annual financial statements after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill with the economic loss of the accident, it is concluded that the cost of environmental pollution accidents in the United States includes the cost of pollution prevention, the cost of oil spill emergency. Pollution compensation costs in three aspects. Almost all direct and indirect losses are included in the pollution compensation costs. Secondly, by comparing the cost of environmental pollution caused by BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill and Conoco Bay oil spill, it is pointed out that the cost accounting scope of environmental pollution accident in China should include direct and indirect losses caused by the accident. The method of measurement should adopt the method of environment replacement cost. Thirdly, this paper puts forward the cost measurement method of environmental pollution accident based on environmental replacement cost, including habitat, biodiversity, fishery, tourism and landscape, which provides a reference for the cost measurement of environmental pollution accident.
【学位授予单位】:兰州商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:X507;F234
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯瑜;张天柱;温宗国;郑鹏凯;;突发水污染事故损失的界定原则[J];环境科学与管理;2006年09期
2 孙炳彦;巴县乡镇工业环境污染造成的经济损失与初步分析[J];重庆环境科学;1996年05期
3 朱小平;徐泓;;环境会计的基本假设[J];财务与会计;1999年03期
4 周志方;李晓青;;国际环境财务会计指南与实务的历史进程、最新动态评述及启示[J];当代经济科学;2009年06期
5 张惠茹;;绿色GDP与环境污染成本核算[J];大连民族学院学报;2007年06期
6 徐玖平,蒋洪强;制造型企业环境成本控制的机理与模式[J];管理世界;2003年04期
7 郑易生,阎林,钱薏红;90年代中期中国环境污染经济损失估算[J];管理世界;1999年02期
8 周一虹,乔岳;环境污染治理成本与收益计量的理论研究[J];环境保护;2004年07期
9 於方;蒋洪强;曹东;王金南;高敏雪;;中国绿色国民经济核算技术体系与方法概论[J];环境保护;2006年18期
10 周悦先,李红;洛阳市大气污染危害人体健康造成经济损失的评估[J];环境与健康杂志;1999年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李冬梅;美国《综合环境反应、赔偿和责任法》上的环境民事责任研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨寅;基于NRDA的海洋溢油生态损害评估方法探讨及案例分析[D];国家海洋局第三海洋研究所;2011年
本文编号:2149071
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jiliangjingjilunwen/2149071.html