我国公共图书馆财政拨款的区域差异性研究

发布时间：2018-08-07 16:23

【摘要】：近年来我国公共图书馆随着我国经济的迅速增长取得了良好的发展,国家加大了对文化建设方面的投入,其中在对公共图书馆的财政拨款也呈现出逐渐增长的趋势。但由于区域经济水平以及各地区政府决策理念的不同,对于公共图书馆的财政拨款数额以及支持力度有所差异。本文通过我国公共图书馆财政拨款的相关数据进行统计分析,比较了不同地区、省市间政府对图书馆拨款数额以及支持力度的差异,并提出其中存在的问题以及改进建议。本文借鉴已有研究成果,对我国各个地区财政拨款各项数据进行了整理分析,初步得到我国对公共图书馆财政拨款区域差异性的现状:中西部地区整体落后与东部地区,但由于各个区域经济水平的提高以及政府对公共图书馆的重视程度的增强,区域间的差异在逐步缩小。通过对二十几位公共图书馆馆长问卷调查,进一步认识到我国现阶段公共图书馆财政拨款存在的问题:首先是经费问题,各个区域间经济水平的差异是决定经费主要原因。而不少地区公共图书馆的经费问题更大程度上取决于当地领导的意志,这也导致了区域内财政拨款的差异性的产生。其次是制度问题,导致经费问题产生的主要原因:对公共图书馆财政拨款制度,对财政拨款制度并没有明确的规章制度,即便有很多地方执行力度远远不够。最后的问题是公共图书馆立法工作的严重滞后。虽然各地已经出台基本公共文化服务保障条例,但对于公共图书馆财政拨款的规定也只是限于原则、目标、活动内容的要求,对于公共图书馆财政拨款具体要求并未对政府做出明确规定。本文通过泰尔指数发现,我国对公共图书馆财政拨款区域的差异性进行量化研究,更为直观的研究我国公共图书馆财政拨款区域间差异性问题的产生原因。通过相关数据的整理计算,我国公共图书馆财政拨款的差异性主要表现在区域间差异,区域内的差异贡献并不明显。这主要由于我国各个地区间对于公共图书馆的重视程度以及各地区间经济水平的决定。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid growth of our country's economy, the public libraries in our country have achieved good development, and the government has increased its investment in cultural construction, among which the financial allocation to the public libraries has also shown a trend of gradual growth. However, due to the difference of the regional economic level and the decision-making ideas of the regional governments, the amount of the financial allocation and the support for the public libraries are different. Based on the statistical analysis of the relevant data of the public library financial allocation in China, this paper compares the differences of the amount and support of the library funds between the governments of different regions, provinces and cities, and puts forward the existing problems and suggestions for improvement. This article draws lessons from the existing research results, carries on the analysis to the each region finance allocation data of our country, preliminarily obtains our country to the public library finance allotment regional difference present situation: the central and western region overall backwardness and the eastern region, However, due to the improvement of regional economic level and the enhancement of the government's attention to public libraries, the differences between regions are gradually reduced. Through the questionnaire survey of more than 20 public library directors, the author further recognizes the problems existing in the financial allocation of public libraries in our country at the present stage: first of all, the problem of funds, and the difference of economic level among different regions is the main reason for determining the expenditure. The funding problem of many district public libraries depends on the will of the local leaders to a great extent, which leads to the difference of the regional financial allocation. Secondly, there is the system problem, which leads to the main reason of the expenditure problem: there are no clear rules and regulations for the public library financial allocation system, even if there are many places where the enforcement is far from enough. The last problem is the serious lag of public library legislation. Although local regulations have been issued on the protection of basic public cultural services, the provisions on the financial allocation of public libraries are also limited to the requirements of principles, objectives, and activities. The specific requirements for public library financial allocations are not clear to the government. In this paper, we find that the quantitative research on the regional difference of public library financial allocation in our country is more intuitionistic to study the causes of the difference between the regions of public library financial allocation. Through the collation and calculation of relevant data, the difference of public library financial allocation in our country is mainly reflected in the regional difference, and the contribution of the difference within the region is not obvious. This is mainly due to the importance of public libraries and the decision of economic level among different regions in China.
【学位授予单位】：天津财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G258.2;F812.45

【相似文献】