公司司法解散制度之实证分析

发布时间：2018-08-18 09:26

【摘要】：公司司法解散制度在我国属于“舶来品”,其最早可追溯到十九世纪中叶的英国,随着一个多世纪商品经济的发展和相关立法的完善,英美法系和大陆法系的很多国家都逐渐确立了该制度。公司作为最重要的商主体,为完善其退出机制,保护股东、债权人和利益相关人的合法权益,我国2006年实施的《公司法》首次引入了该制度,明确了在特定的情况下,股东有请求法院解散公司的权利。但是该规定过于笼统,不管是在公司法理论上还是在具体的法律适用上都产生了较多困惑和争议。鉴于此,最高人民法院于2008年出台了《最高人民法院关于〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(二)》(后文简称《公司法解释二》),该司法解释采用列举加概括的方式,明确了公司司法解散制度适用的法律情况,表明我国对于公司司法解散的制度构建取得了有效的成果,但是各级人民法院审理该类案件是否就如鱼得水,游刃有余呢?显然并非如此。本文主要从具体的裁判案例入手考察,通过筛选和分析,找到公司司法解散制度在我国法律适用中的问题,并提出切实可行的解决思路。本文具体内容如下:第一部分,统计与归纳,对搜集到的案例素材进行分析和研究,在审判实践中考察和验证公司司法解散制度的相关理论,并为后文的研究提供支撑。第二部分,问题与分析,结合案例数据考察现行《公司法》第一百八十二条的条文内容和逻辑结构,具体研究以下六个内容:前四部分是分别对《公司法》第一百八十二条每个小句的考察;第五部分是公司解散后又被诉情形考察;最后是对《公司法》第一百八十二条的文义考察。第三部分,思考与结论,这一部分是对前两部分研究的反思和总结。法学理论研究归根到底是用来指导法律实践的,更好地发挥公司司法解散制度的作用是法学研究的目的和归宿。该部分本文分为两个方面阐述:一是在当前的法律制度框架下,法院审判该类案件要转变审判思路;二是结合公司法的制度和相关理论探究完善司法解散制度的可行途径。
[Abstract]:The system of judicial dissolution of companies in our country belongs to "imported goods", which can be traced back to Britain in the middle of the nineteenth century, with the development of commodity economy and the improvement of relevant legislation in more than a century. Many countries in Anglo-American law system and civil law system have gradually established this system. As the most important business subject, in order to perfect its withdrawal mechanism and protect the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders, creditors and stakeholders, the Company Law, which was implemented in 2006, introduced the system for the first time. Shareholders have the right to ask the court to dissolve the company. However, this provision is too general, whether in the theory of company law or in the specific application of the law has produced more confusion and controversy. In view of this, in 2008, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on some issues concerning the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Company Law interpretation II"), and the judicial interpretation adopted an enumeration and generalization method. Clear the company judicial dissolution system applicable to the legal situation, indicating that our company judicial dissolution of the system has achieved effective results, but the people's courts at all levels to deal with this kind of cases is like a fish in the water, easy to do? Obviously not. This article mainly from the concrete judgment case investigation, through the screening and the analysis, found the company judicial dissolution system in our country legal application question, and proposed the feasible solution thought. The specific contents of this paper are as follows: the first part, statistics and induction, to collect the case material analysis and research, in the trial practice to investigate and verify the company judicial dissolution system related theories, and provide support for the following research. The second part, the problem and analysis, combined with the case data to investigate the content and logical structure of Article 182 of the current Company Law. The first four parts are the investigation of each clause of Article 182 of the Company Law, the fifth part is the investigation of the situation of the company being sued after the dissolution of the company. Finally, the article 182 of the Company Law textual investigation. The third part, thinking and conclusion, this part is the reflection and summary of the first two parts. In the final analysis, the theoretical study of law is used to guide legal practice, and it is the purpose and destination of legal research to give full play to the function of the judicial dissolution system of the company. This part is divided into two aspects: first, under the framework of the current legal system, court trial of such cases to change the way of thinking; second, combined with the system of company law and related theories to explore the possible ways to improve the system of judicial dissolution.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】