新常态下产业转移的马克思经济学分析

发布时间：2018-01-25 14:19

本文关键词： 产业转移资本流动新常态　出处：《经济学家》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：马克思认为,产业转移本质上是资本流动,产业转移的发生遵循价值形式转变的框架,以分工与世界市场的形成为前提,以科技进步为推动力,以追求高额利润和竞争为内外因,以平均利润率的下降为根本原因。国际产业转移的发生加速了国家间的联系,也导致了危机的国际间转移。新常态下中国经济的增速换挡,产业转移要实现经济增长转方式调结构的目的,大力发展高新技术产业,加强技术创新的驱动力,从"世界工厂"转变为"中国制造",迈向全球产业价值链的高端。同时,强化资本的国际输出,抢占新兴市场,争取国际经济的资源、利润与技术份额,实现全球产业布局。
[Abstract]:Marx believes that industrial transfer is essentially capital flow. The occurrence of industrial transfer follows the framework of value form transformation, taking the division of labor and the formation of the world market as the premise and the scientific and technological progress as the driving force. With the pursuit of high profits and competition as the internal and external cause and the decline of the average profit margin as the root cause, the international industrial transfer accelerates the relationship between countries. It also led to the international transfer of the crisis. Under the new normal, China's economic growth shift, industrial transfer to achieve the purpose of economic growth to adjust the structure, vigorously develop high-tech industries, and strengthen the driving force of technological innovation. From "World Factory" to "made in China", to the high end of the global industrial value chain. At the same time, we should strengthen the international export of capital, seize the emerging market, and strive for the share of resources, profits and technology in the international economy. To achieve the global industrial layout.
【作者单位】：厦门大学经济学院;
【分类号】：F0-0;F121.3
【正文快照】： 产业转移是当前世界经济发展格局下的大趋势,也是经济发展活动中的普遍现象,亦是宏观调控中的战略性决策。对其概念的界定至今没有一个统一的说法,本文较认同陈建军的定义,“由于资源供给或产品需求条件发生变化后某些产业从某一个地区或国家转移到另一个地区或国家的一种经济

【相似文献】