符号的神话——鲍德里亚消费社会思想批判

发布时间：2018-02-16 00:38

本文关键词： 符号物符号政治经济学消费社会全球化　出处：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 本文以鲍德里亚早期作品为研究对象,运用文本解释及比较的方法,梳理了鲍德里亚符号理论的演进过程,并与马克思主义相关理论进行比较,试图揭示其“批判”马克思主义的商品社会理论、政治经济学以及历史唯物主义理论时遵循的路径及使用的方法,并对其符号理论进行评判。在本文的绪论部分介绍了本文写作的缘起、国内外有关鲍德里亚符号理论研究的现状、研究方法、思路框架以及文章的现实意义。正文第一章标题为:从生产逻辑到符号逻辑。本章所要解决的问题是,阐释鲍德里亚与马克思在分析资本主义社会形态中运用的不同视角(马克思所运用的是“生产——需要”分析方法,而鲍德里亚运用的则是符号的话语),并对马克思的生产理论与鲍德里亚的符号理论进行总括性的描述。第二章的标题为:物及其使用价值的“符码解构”。本章以鲍德里亚著作《物体系》中对物的分析以及消费社会的相关理论,并结合鲍德里亚在《生产之镜》中对马克思的商品的价值理论的符码解构来展开,这是鲍德里亚运用符号学对现实进行批判的最初尝试。在本章中,作者按马克思商品社会的“商品物”——德波的“景观物”——鲍德里亚的“符号物”的逻辑顺序来阐释,并对鲍德里亚所追求的象征社会中的物的存在状态进行了相关介绍。第三章的题目是:鲍德里亚的符号政治经济学——政治经济学的符码解构。本章通过对鲍德里亚与马克思主义政治经济学的比较,分析了鲍德里亚所创立的“符号政治经济学”框架。顺接第二章,物向符号的转化,必将使得对资本主义消费社会的批判转向消费文化领域,从而导致与马克思主义政治经济学的孑然对立。并由此导致其在《生产之镜》中对马克思主义历史唯物主义的彻底批判。第四章的题目是:“生产之镜”及对历史唯物主义的“批判”——人类历史的符码解构。鲍德里亚认为,马克思所创设的历史唯物主义只是在“生产”这面预先设置好的“镜子”反射下而得出的历史发展理论。而生产劳动概念本身只不过是资本主义通过对“符号”进行操控而制造出来的抽象。这是他的符号理论在对物及政治经济学的分析上得以运用之后,在哲学与人类学范畴中的必然体现,本章将对他的这种观点进行分析和批判。第五章的标题为:对鲍德里亚的再评价。主要是对鲍德里亚符号理论进行评价,阐释其积极意义与不足。作者试图从经济一体化的视角,分析在当今发生重大变化的社会里,马克思主义政治经济学的地位和生命力,最终得出这样的结论:马克思的政治经济学以及他的历史唯物主义,即使在被称做消费社会的资本主义发达时期,仍然具有极强的现实批判力。最后是结论部分。是对全文论点的总结与升华。
[Abstract]:This paper takes Baudrillard's early works as the research object, and combs the evolution of Baudrillard's symbolic theory by means of textual interpretation and comparison, and compares it with the relevant Marxist theories. This paper attempts to reveal the path and methods followed in criticizing Marxist commodity social theory, political economy and historical materialism theory, and to judge its symbolic theory. In the introduction part, the author introduces the origin of the writing, the current situation, the research methods, the frame of thought and the practical significance of the research on Baudrillard's sign theory at home and abroad. The first chapter of the text is entitled: from production logic to symbolic logic. Explaining the different perspectives used by Baudrillard and Marx in the analysis of capitalist social formation (Marx used the analytical method of "production-need", Baudrillard uses the words of symbols and gives a general description of Marx's production theory and Baudrillard's sign theory. The second chapter is entitled "Deconstruction of object and its use value". This chapter is based on Baudrillard's analysis of things and the relevant theories of consumer society in Baudrillard's works "the system of things". Combining with Baudrillard's code deconstruction of Marx's commodity value theory in the Mirror of production, this is Baudrillard's initial attempt to use semiotics to criticize reality. The author interprets the logical sequence of "commodity"-"landscape object" by Debo and "symbol object" of Baudrillard in Marx's commodity society, and introduces the existence state of things in symbolic society pursued by Baudrillard. The third chapter is entitled: Baudrillard's symbolic political economy-the code deconstruction of political economy. This paper analyzes the framework of "symbolic political economy" created by Baudrillard. In the second chapter, the transformation from substance to symbol will make the criticism of capitalist consumer society turn to the field of consumer culture. Thus it leads to the isolation of Marxist political economy and its thorough criticism of Marxist historical materialism in the Mirror of production. Chapter 4th is entitled "the Mirror of production" and "critique" of Historical materialism-Deconstruction of the Code of Human History. The historical materialism created by Marx is only a theory of historical development reflected by the pre-set "mirror" of "production". The concept of productive labor itself is nothing more than capitalism through the "symbol". The abstraction created by manipulation. This is after his symbolic theory was applied to the analysis of matter and political economy, In the category of philosophy and anthropology, this chapter will analyze and criticize his view. Chapter 5th is entitled: reappraisal of Baudrillard. It mainly evaluates Baudrillard's symbolic theory and explains its positive significance and deficiency. The position and vitality of Marxist political economy have finally come to the following conclusion: Marx's political economy and his historical materialism, even in the period of capitalist development known as consumer society, Still has the extremely strong reality critical power. The last part is the conclusion. It is the summary and sublimation of the thesis.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：F091.91

【引证文献】