三种资本双重性理论的比较——马克思、蒲鲁东、西美尔

发布时间：2018-03-08 22:06

本文选题：资本双重性理论　切入点：马克思　出处：《教学与研究》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在现代思想谱系中,不仅马克思系统地阐发了其资本双重性理论,而且蒲鲁东、西美尔等人也提出了对资本积极性和消极性的理解。但是,相似形式的背后,却是三种资本双重性理论的原则区别,具体体现在:(1)各自得出资本双重性结论的世界观前提不同,(2)各自对资本双重性历史内涵的阐发不同,(3)各自提出的克服由资本双重性造成的现代生产生活异化状态的社会改造方案不同。划清三者的界限,对于准确把握马克思的历史唯物主义和辩证法思想、清除"《货币哲学》是《资本论》续篇"的流俗见解等等,具有重要的学术意义。
[Abstract]:In the genealogy of modern thought, not only Marx systematically elucidated his theory of duality of capital, but also Brudon, Simmel and others put forward an understanding of the enthusiasm and negativity of capital. But it is the principle difference of three kinds of capital duality theory, It is embodied in: 1) the premise of the world outlook on the conclusion of the duality of capital is different (2) the historical connotation of duality of capital is elucidated in different ways) the state of dissimilation of modern production and life caused by the duality of capital is overcome. Different social rehabilitation programs. Draw a line between the three, It is of great academic significance to accurately grasp Marx's historical materialism and dialectics and to clear up the vulgar opinions that "philosophy of money" is a sequel to "Capital" and so on.
【作者单位】：天津师范大学马克思主义学院;空军航空大学人文社会科学系;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“马克思资本双重性思想及当代价值研究”(项目号:14BZX011) 2013年度教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“历史唯物主义视域中资本逻辑批判及当代价值研究”(项目号:13YJC720017)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F014.39

【相似文献】