再论马克思的“农业公社”问题——与宋培军、张秋霞两位先生商榷

发布时间：2018-04-21 17:01

  本文选题：马克思 + 农业公社　； 参考：《史学理论研究》2017年02期

【摘要】："农业公社"是马克思在给查苏利奇《复信草稿》中提出的重要概念。本文在综合考察法文手稿及相关原文资料后进一步确认:"农业公社"是马克思在"农村公社"这一当时学界习用语基础上的术语创新,两者不可混同;由于有关日耳曼"农业公社"的研究意味着马克思在欧洲农村公社发展谱系的认识上已开始摆脱"亚细亚的"历史观,因此绝不可把"农业公社"与所谓的"亚细亚公社"等同起来。尽管如此,因为"农业公社"概念无论在现实中还是历史上都可能与俄国公社的实际情况不符,所以马克思最终放弃了对"农业公社"概念的继续探讨。
[Abstract]:"Agricultural commune" is an important concept put forward by Marx in the draft of Charles sulich. After a comprehensive review of French manuscripts and relevant original documents, this article confirms that "agricultural commune" is an artistic innovation based on the idioms of the "rural commune", which is based on the idioms of the "rural commune" at that time. The study of commune "means that Marx has begun to get rid of the" Asian "view of history in the understanding of the development pedigree of the European commune. Therefore, it must not equate the" agricultural commune "with the so-called" Asian commune ". However, the concept of" agricultural commune "may be in reality or historically with the reality of the Russian commune. The situation is not consistent, so Marx finally abandoned the concept of "agricultural commune" to continue to explore.

【作者单位】： 长安大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：A81;F091.91
，

本文编号：1783303