批判还是修缮:如何面对资本逻辑的悖论——《21世纪资本论》的理论局限分析
发布时间：2018-07-21 13:45
【摘要】：皮凯蒂在《21世纪资本论》一书中以经济大数据为依据,讨论了在国民财富的分配中,资本利润率总是大于国民经济总增长率(即rg)的现象,这导致了资本的增长比整体经济增长更快,以此论证在西方现代(资本主义)民主社会体制下,随着经济发展,社会财富在拥有资本的少数人手上逐渐集中的发展趋势。皮凯蒂将批判的锋芒指向这一趋势,认为这在一定程度上是对现代民主社会劳动致富价值观的否定,并且导致了这一价值观向承袭制的回归。皮凯蒂的这一论证从某种角度印证了马克思的基本观点:剩余价值在资本一端以利润的方式被积累。然而,与马克思的批判锋芒指向资本主义生产关系不同,皮凯蒂的研究归宿是修缮资本主义制度,提倡不仅用资本累进税、甚而用全球资本累进税的方式来抑制资本利润的无限累进幅度。在资本全球化而世界体制并不存在的情况下,人们只能将皮凯蒂的这一设想看作一种乌托邦。
[Abstract]:In his book Capital in the 21st Century, Piketty discusses the phenomenon that the profit rate of capital is always greater than the total growth rate of the national economy (R g) in the distribution of national wealth based on the economic big data. This led to the faster growth of capital than the overall economic growth, thus demonstrating the trend of the concentration of social wealth in the hands of a small number of people with capital in the western modern (capitalist) democratic society, with the development of the economy. Piketty pointed the criticism to this trend, which to some extent negated the value of labor enrichment in modern democratic society, and led to the return of this value to the inheritance system. Piketty's argument confirms Marx's basic view in some ways: surplus value is accumulated in the form of profit at the end of capital. However, unlike Marx's critique of the capitalist relations of production, Piketty's research ended in repairing the capitalist system and advocating not only a progressive tax on capital. Even a global capital progressive tax is used to curb the infinitely progressive extent of capital profits. With the globalization of capital and the non-existence of the world system, one can only regard the idea of Piketty as a kind of utopia.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大研究项目“当代主要社会思潮的最新动态研究与批判”(编号2014YCXZD001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.3-5
本文编号：2135717
[Abstract]:In his book Capital in the 21st Century, Piketty discusses the phenomenon that the profit rate of capital is always greater than the total growth rate of the national economy (R g) in the distribution of national wealth based on the economic big data. This led to the faster growth of capital than the overall economic growth, thus demonstrating the trend of the concentration of social wealth in the hands of a small number of people with capital in the western modern (capitalist) democratic society, with the development of the economy. Piketty pointed the criticism to this trend, which to some extent negated the value of labor enrichment in modern democratic society, and led to the return of this value to the inheritance system. Piketty's argument confirms Marx's basic view in some ways: surplus value is accumulated in the form of profit at the end of capital. However, unlike Marx's critique of the capitalist relations of production, Piketty's research ended in repairing the capitalist system and advocating not only a progressive tax on capital. Even a global capital progressive tax is used to curb the infinitely progressive extent of capital profits. With the globalization of capital and the non-existence of the world system, one can only regard the idea of Piketty as a kind of utopia.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大研究项目“当代主要社会思潮的最新动态研究与批判”(编号2014YCXZD001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.3-5
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 本报记者 李小佳;“皮凯蒂热”给我们提了个醒[N];解放日报;2014年
2 见习记者 周艾琳;皮凯蒂：向“世袭财富”开刀的人[N];第一财经日报;2014年
3 本报驻布鲁塞尔记者 陆振华;与皮凯蒂面对面：《21世纪资本论》的野心[N];21世纪经济报道;2014年
4 早报记者 石剑峰;“缩小收入差距，，教育投资最重要”[N];东方早报;2014年
本文编号：2135717
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2135717.html
