几个经典经济增长模型的比较分析
发布时间：2018-08-11 13:15
【摘要】：古典学派中,围绕经济增长问题形成了许多典型的理论模型,为经济工作奠定了理论基础和研究框架。然而,经济发展不断推进理论的变革和完善,在古典经济学理论中许多假设条件距离经济实际本身较远,特别是空间转移和运输成本,既是实际问题又是理论缺陷,为使经济理论更恰当的解释经济事实,不同的学者试图以新的方法并从新的视角解决古典经济理论的缺陷,并增强理论解释力。基于此,文章选取古典理论的新古典增长模型、AK模型、产品多样化模型、熊彼特模型进行比较,以更清晰地理解上述两种理论的差别。
[Abstract]:In the classical school, many typical theoretical models have been formed around the problem of economic growth, which has laid a theoretical foundation and research framework for economic work. However, economic development is pushing forward the reform and perfection of the theory. In classical economic theory, many hypothetical conditions are far from the economic reality, especially the space transfer and transportation cost, which is both a practical problem and a theoretical defect. In order to make economic theory explain economic facts more appropriately, different scholars try to solve the defects of classical economic theory with new methods and from a new perspective, and strengthen the theoretical interpretation. Based on this, this paper selects the neoclassical growth model (AK), product diversification model and Schumpeter model of classical theory to compare and understand the difference between the two theories more clearly.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学;延边大学经济系;
【分类号】：F224;F061.2
本文编号：2177103
[Abstract]:In the classical school, many typical theoretical models have been formed around the problem of economic growth, which has laid a theoretical foundation and research framework for economic work. However, economic development is pushing forward the reform and perfection of the theory. In classical economic theory, many hypothetical conditions are far from the economic reality, especially the space transfer and transportation cost, which is both a practical problem and a theoretical defect. In order to make economic theory explain economic facts more appropriately, different scholars try to solve the defects of classical economic theory with new methods and from a new perspective, and strengthen the theoretical interpretation. Based on this, this paper selects the neoclassical growth model (AK), product diversification model and Schumpeter model of classical theory to compare and understand the difference between the two theories more clearly.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学;延边大学经济系;
【分类号】：F224;F061.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 易永锡;王培县;;基于新古典增长模型对中国二元经济的分析[J];荆门职业技术学院学报;2007年02期
2 黎德福;黄玖立;;新古典增长模型:一个重新表述[J];南开经济研究;2007年04期
3 郭志广;;基于新古典增长模型的中国经济增长分析[J];知识经济;2009年01期
4 张焕明;;我国新古典增长模型的选择与分析——基于核算方法与技术中性假定下要素产出弹性约束的实证分析[J];统计教育;2007年06期
5 周密;;中国经济增长展望——基于新古典增长模型的实证分析[J];东方企业文化;2010年01期
6 王文杰;刘俊峰;;新古典增长模型:来自中国数据的验证[J];金融经济;2007年08期
7 徐小飞;龚德恩;;新古典增长模型与奥肯定律——理论研究与实证分析[J];嘉兴学院学报;2007年01期
8 沈小波;;资源环境约束下的经济增长与政策选择——基于新古典增长模型的理论分析[J];中国经济问题;2010年05期
9 贺秋硕;;劳动力流动与收入收敛——一个改进的新古典增长模型及对中国的启示[J];财经研究;2005年10期
10 霍影;;基于新古典增长模型的中国经济增长路径分析[J];南京财经大学学报;2009年06期
，本文编号：2177103
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2177103.html
