资本与生产力关系的哲学审视
[Abstract]:The contradictions of equity and efficiency, development and cost, and economic ethics in the development of productive forces in modern society are inherent in the operation of capital. Only the dialectical relationship between them can we deeply understand and correctly solve a series of contradictions in the development of productive forces, thus providing theoretical proof for the rapid, stable and healthy development of social productive forces.
This paper holds that the development of the productive forces of human society has its historical inevitability through the capital stage.Capital is essentially a form of value.On the basis of social division of labor and labor exchange,commodities are bound to appear and can be interpreted as use value and exchange value.Because of the inherent contradiction of commodities,exchange value is bound to require independence. Money contains the contradiction between qualitative simplicity and quantitative infinity, which inherently requires infinite increment in quantity. Once this inherent contradiction in concept is combined with labor which creates value abstractly in production, it will inevitably be transformed into capital. In force development, as the unity of production relations and technological operation, capital includes three meanings: from the perspective of the great process of the development of human social productive forces, it is a mode of production; from the perspective of technology, it is a value that can bring surplus value, is a currency; from the perspective of production factors, it is tangible. The relationship between capital and market economy is as follows: capital is the key to distinguish commodity economy from market economy, and the development of productivity in market economy is driven by capital. Capital is the main body of market economy, and market economy is the self-dependence of ownership capital. From competition, the economic development mode of effective allocation of social resources can be formed.
Capital is an effective form to adapt to the development of productive forces in modern society. In modern social production, on the one hand, man acts on nature and the tools for developing productive forces are mostly large machines in a centralized form. On the other hand, if the development of productive forces is to achieve continuous accumulation, it is impossible to distribute the results of labor equally to every laborer, so it is necessary to concentrate the results of labor in some form as a prerequisite for further development of productive forces. The laborer must put his own labor into production as a commodity. Large machine production makes people's labor the simplest, thus making the whole social labor universalization and abstraction; universalization and abstraction of labor for the establishment of value forms in the whole society provides a practical basis. Under the domination of Ben, it is embodied in the form of value.
The historical reason for the existence of capital is the development of productive forces.The development of social productive forces in general is realized in the concrete process of labor composed of material needs and productive labor, spiritual needs and spiritual production, economic exchanges and norms of communication.The internal mechanism of capital in the development of productive forces lies in its suitability for modern socialization. Production can constantly absorb the social forces that "cost nothing", such as division of labor, cooperation and other overall forces; it can constantly absorb scientific knowledge, so that scientific knowledge can be effectively applied to the development of productive forces; it preserves and develops social productive forces in expanding social exchanges, which is in today's economy. WP = 3 is very clear in globalization; it develops social productive forces in the constant competition among them; the strong vitality of capital operation is also manifested in its inherent innovation mechanism. The generalization of value production transforms people's concrete material needs into abstract needs, Abstract needs into concrete needs in consumption, and endless Abstract needs constantly stimulate the development of productive forces; secondly, the dialectical movement of "one" and "many" in capital operation, that is, the "one" of money is done through market and value law. With the "many" transformed into the factors of production, through the concrete labor process of production and the circulation process of commodities, "many" is transformed into the "one" of increased value. Thirdly, in production, the purpose of capital-added production requires that necessary labor be added to increase surplus value, and at the same time, the requirement of adopting new machines or new technologies will reduce the necessity. Labor; in circulation, capital, in order to make production go smoothly, not only needs to expand the scope of commodity circulation, but also requires the elimination of circulation.
The intrinsic mechanism and dialectical movement of capital to promote the development of productive forces ultimately promote the development of human social productive forces, create a solid material foundation for the future society, open up universal social exchanges and even globalization, promote the progress of scientific knowledge, and thus further promote the development of social productive forces. As for the specific process of capital operation, capital has the side of restricting the development of productive forces. The production of unrestricted surplus value promotes capital to plunder natural resources and squeeze labor force, thus causing the contradiction between capital appreciation and optimizing the ecological environment, resulting in capital appreciation and human development. These contradictions prove the historical temporariness of capital. The existence of capital has world historical significance. The low level of development of the contemporary world's total productive forces determines that there is still much room for capital production. Knowledge capital and human capital are new forms of contemporary capital. The essence of knowledge-based economy is that knowledge plays an important role in production only by means of capitalization. But the great role that knowledge has played in capital production and the futurism theory of some contemporary western scholars can prove Marx's prediction about the limit of capital operation. As far as the whole mankind is concerned, knowledge once replaces money capital in production Production dominates, value, money and capital disappear.
Under the market economy of the primary stage of socialism, the existence of capital has historical inevitability because of the relatively low level of development of productive forces, the rationality of the commercialization of ownership and labor force, and the development trend of reform and opening up and economic globalization.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2002
【分类号】:F014.2
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王安异;;法益侵害还是规范违反[J];刑法论丛;2007年01期
2 于改之;;可罚的违法性理论及其在中国的适用[J];刑法论丛;2007年02期
3 陈璇;;对紧急避险正当化根据的再思考[J];刑法论丛;2007年02期
4 马荣春;周建达;;犯罪危害性刑法学地位的新视角:犯罪危害性的属性[J];刑法论丛;2009年01期
5 邓君韬;;超规范问题及其意义——对犯罪认知体系方法论的初步考察[J];刑法论丛;2009年01期
6 李凤梅;;古典学派语境下的教唆犯地位研究[J];刑法论丛;2009年02期
7 莫洪宪;彭文华;;德、日犯罪论体系之利弊分析[J];刑法论丛;2009年03期
8 马荣春;周建达;;为社会危害性概念的刑法学地位辨正——兼与陈兴良教授商榷[J];刑法论丛;2009年03期
9 周建军;;刑事司法政策的形成与执行[J];刑法论丛;2009年04期
10 吴情树;;京特·雅科布斯的刑法思想介评[J];刑法论丛;2010年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李建德;;产业发展中的文化变迁——以江西省余江县中童镇眼镜业为例[A];第十一届中国制度经济学年会论文汇编(下)[C];2011年
2 刘长军;;财产理论与建构和谐社会[A];科学发展:社会管理与社会和谐——2011学术前沿论丛(下)[C];2011年
3 谢名家;;文化经济理论在宏观社会学视野中的展现[A];中国社会科学院第三届中国经济论坛论文集(下)[C];2007年
4 段从学;;《同情》:一种被忽略的现代性体验[A];“辛亥百年与四川小说创作”学术研讨会论文集(《当代文坛》2011年增刊)[C];2011年
5 刘虹利;孟繁华;;感悟与发现——李一清的“乡村中国”[A];这就是我们的文学生活——《当代文坛》三十年评论精选(下)[C];2012年
6 高峰;;社会秩序何以可能?——基于存在论的研究视角[A];2010年中国社会学年会——“社会稳定与危机预警预控管理系统研究”论坛论文集[C];2010年
7 赵丹;;法律职业伦理的生成与基督教传统[A];第四届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2008年
8 林华;;贵州少数民族文化与影视传播研究——以贵州影视作品为例[A];贵州省写作学会2011年学术年会论文集[C];2011年
9 白云;;和谐社会下我国公民法治精神的培育[A];创新思想·科学发展·构建和谐——黑龙江省首届社会科学学术年会优秀论文集上册[C];2008年
10 吕佳;;大众文化语境下精英文化遭际的文化意味[A];黑龙江省文学学会2011年学术年会论文集[C];2011年
本文编号:2250103
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2250103.html