论马克思对货币拜物教的批判
发布时间：2019-07-07 19:30
【摘要】：马克思的货币理论随着他的哲学观的逻辑演进而不断发展。他把货币的本质开始理解为交换媒介,接着看作是私有财产之间的交换关系,后来克服了李嘉图的货币数量论,在《资本论》及手稿中才科学阐明了货币的本质是社会生产关系。马克思从历史与逻辑的统一深刻揭示了货币的拜物教性质比商品的拜物教性质更加明显和耀眼的谜底,金银之所以凭借其自然属性而成为货币,其实是商品内在矛盾的发展以及对货币背后的社会关系本质的颠倒和遮蔽。在这个基础上,马克思对资产阶级经济学家重商主义和货币数量论陷入货币拜物教进行了深刻批判。
[Abstract]:Marx's monetary theory developed with the logical evolution of his philosophy. He understood the essence of money as the medium of exchange, then as the exchange relationship between private property, and then overcome Ricardo's theory of monetary quantity. Only in Das Kapital and manuscripts did he scientifically clarify that the essence of money is the relationship of social production. Marx deeply revealed from the unity of history and logic that the fetishism nature of money is more obvious and dazzling than that of commodity fetishism. The reason why gold and silver become currency by virtue of its natural attribute is in fact the development of internal contradictions of commodities and the reversal and concealment of the essence of social relations behind money. On this basis, Marx deeply criticized bourgeois economists mercantilism and money quantity theory falling into monetary fetishism.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：北京市社科基金一般项目“马克思《1861—1863年经济学手稿》当代研究”(15ZXB010) 北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(首都师范大学)“马克思主义与当代中国文化建设”(PXM2016-014203-000107)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.91
[Abstract]:Marx's monetary theory developed with the logical evolution of his philosophy. He understood the essence of money as the medium of exchange, then as the exchange relationship between private property, and then overcome Ricardo's theory of monetary quantity. Only in Das Kapital and manuscripts did he scientifically clarify that the essence of money is the relationship of social production. Marx deeply revealed from the unity of history and logic that the fetishism nature of money is more obvious and dazzling than that of commodity fetishism. The reason why gold and silver become currency by virtue of its natural attribute is in fact the development of internal contradictions of commodities and the reversal and concealment of the essence of social relations behind money. On this basis, Marx deeply criticized bourgeois economists mercantilism and money quantity theory falling into monetary fetishism.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：北京市社科基金一般项目“马克思《1861—1863年经济学手稿》当代研究”(15ZXB010) 北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(首都师范大学)“马克思主义与当代中国文化建设”(PXM2016-014203-000107)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 张一兵;;事物化与物化:从韦伯到青年卢卡奇[J];现代哲学;2015年01期
2 叶险明;;关于马克思晚年相关思想研究中的误区——兼论“中国资本主义萌芽”所涉及的“五形态论”问题[J];马克思主义研究;2015年01期
3 李怀涛;;马克思的拜物教概念辨析[J];马克思主义与现实;2014年02期
4 唐正东;;马克思拜物教批判理论的辩证特性及其当代启示[J];哲学研究;2010年07期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 李怀涛;;论马克思对货币拜物教的批判[J];马克思主义研究;2017年01期
2 常培杰;;阿多诺美学理论中的“物性”问题[J];人文杂志;2016年11期
3 张明;;西方现代性困境与中国道路的理论前景[J];毛泽东邓小平理论研究;2016年02期
4 张进;王W，
本文编号：2511385
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2511385.html
