农户土地价值观分化对耕地保护行为的影响研究

发布时间：2018-01-10 00:12

本文关键词：农户土地价值观分化对耕地保护行为的影响研究　出处：《甘肃农业大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：土地之于农民不仅仅是简单的生产资料,更是生产生活的全部内容。农民从诞生之日起便与土地有着息息相关的联系。在中国传统文化里,土地是农民身份的象征,同时土地数量的多寡更是财富与权利的象征。它不仅仅是简单地生产资料,更重要的是承载着农民的价值信仰与精神寄托。围绕着土地,我们的祖辈形成了特有的土地价值观,这种土地价值观对农民的社会生活产生了重要的影响,并形成了独有的农耕文化。改革开放以来,随着我国社会主义市场经济体制的逐步确立,土地对于农民的重要性渐渐发生变化,土地不再是农民生产生活的全部,传统的农民土地价值观发生了很大的改变,这不仅影响了农民的生产生活方式而且对土地的利用产生深远影响。主要表现在:大量的农业人口转向二、三产业,而将土地粗放经营甚至是抛荒、撂荒;少量的农村劳动力通过土地的流转形成了规模化的经营,重新赋予了土地新的价值;大多数农民对土地的利用不再精耕细作,忽视了耕地的质量。为了探究农户土地价值观的理论体系及其对土地利用的影响,本研究在对农户阶层进行划分的基础上,采用独立样本T检验实证测度不同阶层农户土地价值观的差异,并据此构建了土地价值观的5个维度。以农户耕地保护行为为对象,采用模糊综合评判法检验了农户耕地保护程度。最后运用结构方程模型,定量分析了农户土地价值观对耕地保护行为的影响程度。相关结论如下:(1)依据农户的职业特征、家庭收入来源的不同,当前我国农户可以划分为承包大户、纯农小农经营户、一兼户、二兼户、非农户5个阶层。纯农小农经营户与二兼户更加认可土地是一种为本价值;一兼户对土地是保障价值的说法更为赞同;承包大户更倾向于土地是致富价值的说法;非农户对土地是包袱价值与权利价值的说法更为赞同。(2)本研究所构建的农户土地价值观由土地为本观、土地保障观、土地致富观、土地包袱观、土地权利观五个维度构成具有理论意义。农户土地价值观量表整体信度系数为0.906,各分量表的信度系数介于(0.83,0.893)之间,量表内部一致性很好。量表通过了收敛效度和区划效度检验,即各维度既能单独测度农户土地价值观的不同方面,也能同时反应农户土地价值观这一相同内容。(3)农户耕地质量保护程度评判表明,农户耕地质量保护程度较弱,在第四等级上隶属度最大,隶属度为0.236.;耕地数量保护程度评判表明,农户较好的保护耕地数量,其在第二等级上隶属度最大,隶属度为0.093;农户耕地外部性保护程度评判表明,农户耕地外部性保护程度较差,其在第四等级上的隶属度最大,隶属度为0.054;从总体来看,农户耕地保护程度较弱,同样在第四等级上的隶属度最大,隶属度为0.156.(4)农户土地价值观对耕地保护行为的结构方程模型结果表明:土地为本观、土地致富观较土地保障观、土地包袱观、土地权利观对耕地质量保护的影响更大,而土地包袱观、土地权利观分别负向影响了耕地质量保护;在耕地数量保护方面,土地致富观对其影响最大,土地为本观其次,土地保障观对耕地数量保护的影响明显低于土地致富观与土地为本观。土地包袱观与土地权利观同样对耕地数量保护产生负向影响;在耕地外部性保护方面,除了土地为本观能较大程度的正向的影响耕地外部性保护,土地保障观、土地致富观、土地包袱观、土地权利观对耕地外部性保护影响程度均不大,其中土地保障观、土地包袱观、土地权利观均负向的影响了耕地外部性保护。
[Abstract]:Land for farmers is not only a simple means of production, it is all of life and production. Farmers from the date of its birth and land is closely related. Chinese in traditional culture, land is a symbol of the identity of the peasants, and the amount of land is a symbol of wealth and power. It is not only a simple the production of information, more important is the carrying value of faith and spiritual sustenance. Farmers around the land, our ancestors have formed a unique view of the land value, land value has an important influence on the social life of farmers, and formed a unique farming culture. Since the reform and opening up, along with the gradual establishment China's socialist market economic system, the importance of land to the peasants gradually change, land is no longer the lives of farmers, farmers' land value of the traditional view has undergone great This change, not only affects the farmer's production and life style but also have a profound influence on the land use. Mainly in: a large number of agricultural population to two, the three industry, and will land extensive management and even abandoned, abandoned; a small amount of rural labor through land circulation has formed the scale of the operation, to give the the new value of land use; most farmers on the land no longer ignore the quality of cultivated land intensive and meticulous farming,. In order to explore the theoretical system of farmers' land values and its impact on land use, based on the division of the farmers order layer, independent samples T test was used to measure different levels of empirical values of the difference of land farmers, and then build the 5 dimensions of land values. The behavior of farmers to protect cultivated land as the research object, to test the farmers land protection degree using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Finally. Using structural equation model, the quantitative analysis of farmers' land values influence on cultivated land protection behavior. The related conclusions are as follows: (1) based on the characteristics of farmers' occupation, family income is different, the current farmers can be divided into large contractors, pure agricultural peasant households, and households, two households and non. Between the 5 classes. The pure agricultural small business households and two households and more recognition of the value of the land is a land of a household; and is the security value of the argument is more favor; large contractors tend to land is rich value statement; non farmers burden value and the right value of the argument is more in favour of (2) land. Land value constructed in this research by the concept of land, land protection, land rich view of land, land burden view, right view of the five dimensions has theoretical significance. Land values overall reliability coefficient scale were 0.9 06, the reliability coefficient of each sub scale range (0.83,0.893) between the internal consistency of the scale were good. The scale through the convergent validity and validity of each dimension division, which can independently measure different aspects of farmers land values, land can also response values of the same content (3). Show that the farmers cultivated land quality protection degree evaluation, farmers cultivated land quality protection is weaker in the fourth level of the largest membership, membership is 0.236.; that the quantity of cultivated land protection degree evaluation, the number of farmers to better protect arable land, the second level of membership, membership is 0.093; that of cropland external protection degree evaluation of cultivated land protection, external degree is poor, in the fourth grade of the largest membership, membership is 0.054; overall, the degree of cultivated land protection is weak, the same in the fourth grade of membership in the Large membership for 0.156. (4) land values of cultivated land protection behavior of the structural equation model shows that: the concept of land, the land is rich land protection, land burden concept, the concept of land rights protection of cultivated land quality and land more burden view, right view of land were negative the influence of cultivated land quality protection; in terms of the quantity of cultivated land protection, land rich view of the greatest impact on the land, the concept of second land protection effect on arable land protection is significantly lower than that of land and land for the rich view view view of the same land. The burden has a negative influence on the quantity of cultivated land protection and land use rights in view; the externality of arable land protection, in addition to the land for this view can be largely positive externality of cultivated land protection, land protection, land rich view, land burden concept, influence on the cultivated land protection of land rights externality The degree of land security, the concept of land burden and the view of land rights all negatively affect the protection of the cultivated land externality.

【学位授予单位】：甘肃农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F323.211

【相似文献】