当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 农业经济论文 >

扶贫动态管理和贫困退出中的矛盾及其解决——基于湖北省徐家村贫困户和普通农户的调研分析

发布时间:2018-01-10 13:20

  本文关键词:扶贫动态管理和贫困退出中的矛盾及其解决——基于湖北省徐家村贫困户和普通农户的调研分析 出处:《西部论坛》2017年04期  论文类型:期刊论文


  更多相关文章: 贫困退出 扶贫动态管理 贫困户 普通农户 扶贫对象 精准扶贫 贫困识别 扶贫资源


【摘要】:随着精准扶贫工作进入攻坚期,我国贫困人口脱贫进程不断加快,相对静态的扶贫管理方式已难以满足当前贫困退出工作需要。对湖北省徐家村的田野调查显示:贫困户与普通农户对于扶贫动态管理和贫困退出的意见和态度既存在相似性,也存在差异性,贫困户希望动态管理能够更加全面,普通农户则希望贫困进出通道更加畅通。扶贫动态管理和贫困退出机制不够健全,如进出机制不够灵活、动态监测指标单一等问题是贫困户和普通农户的共识;贫困户认为动态监测不全面,导致自身部分贫困问题得不到及时帮扶;普通农户认为贫困进出机制不灵活,一旦成为贫困户便可以长期占有扶贫资源,新的贫困群体则难以介入。为化解社会矛盾,促进全面建成小康社会,不但要强化扶贫动态管理,并逐步构建科学规范、公平高效的贫困退出机制;还应坚持正向激励,强化问责督导,让贫困退出经得起社会和时间的检验。
[Abstract]:With the precision of poverty relief work into a critical period, the process of poverty alleviation of the poor population in China has been accelerated. The relatively static management of poverty alleviation has been difficult to meet the needs of the current poverty relief work. A field survey of Xujia Village in Hubei Province shows that:. The opinions and attitudes of poor households and ordinary farmers on poverty alleviation dynamic management and poverty withdrawal are similar. There are differences, poor households want to dynamic management can be more comprehensive, ordinary farmers want to poor access to more unimpeded. Poverty alleviation dynamic management and poverty withdrawal mechanism is not perfect, such as access mechanism is not flexible enough. The single dynamic monitoring index is the consensus of poor households and ordinary farmers. Poor households believe that dynamic monitoring is not comprehensive, leading to their own poverty problems can not be timely help; Ordinary peasant households think that the mechanism of poverty entry and exit is inflexible, once they become poor households, they can possess poverty alleviation resources for a long time, but it is difficult for the new poor groups to intervene in order to resolve the social contradictions and promote the building of a well-off society in an all-round way. Not only to strengthen the dynamic management of poverty alleviation, but also to gradually build a scientific and standardized, fair and efficient poverty withdrawal mechanism; We should also insist on positive incentives, strengthen accountability supervision, and let poverty exit to stand the test of society and time.
【作者单位】: 湖北省社会科学院财贸研究所;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金资助项目(16BJY116)
【分类号】:F323.8
【正文快照】: 一、引言2016年4月,国务院发布了《关于建立贫困退出机制的意见》,明确要求运用动态管理的思路推进贫困退出工作,并重点指出要在贫困退出工作中做好对扶贫对象的跟踪研判,及时发现和解决扶贫对象的各类苗头性、倾向性问题。扶贫动态管理不仅是一种政府行为,同样也是对扶贫公平

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张喜杰;董阳;;国家治理能力视域中贫困县退出机制研究[J];经济问题;2016年06期

2 尧水根;;论精准识别与精准帮扶实践问题及应对[J];农业考古;2016年03期

3 陈辉;张全红;;基于多维贫困测度的贫困精准识别及精准扶贫对策——以粤北山区为例[J];广东财经大学学报;2016年03期

4 张琦;史志乐;;我国农村贫困退出机制研究[J];中国科学院院刊;2016年03期

5 虞崇胜;唐斌;余扬;;能力、权利、制度:精准脱贫战略的三维实现机制[J];理论探讨;2016年02期

6 赵武;王姣s,

本文编号:1405419


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/1405419.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4d35c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com