市场主导型与政府主导型家庭农场比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 02:00

本文选题：家庭农场　切入点：市场主导型　出处：《安徽大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：党的十八大报告提出“培育新型经营主体,发展多种形式规模经营,构建集约化、专业化、组织化、社会化相结合的新型农业经营体系”,2013年中央一号文件进一步指出“鼓励和支持承包土地向专业大户、家庭农场、农民合作社流转,发展多种形式的适度规模经营”。党和政府在政策层面上对转变农业经营方式,发展家庭农场的高度重视促进了家庭农场在实践层面上的迅速发展,各地根据本地特殊情况发展不同形式的家庭农场并取得了有效成果。按照家庭农场形成过程中政府介入程度作为划分标准,将其区分为市场主导型家庭农场和政府主导型家庭农场。对市场主导型和政府主导型这两种类型家庭农场进行比较研究,探求出二者的异同,是本文的目的所在。本文依据笔者参与的在安徽和河南两省五市九县(区)实地调研所获取的278份家庭农场调查问卷,对两种不同类型的家庭农场异同点进行比较研究。文章从家庭农场主个人特征、农场农地流转情况、农场融资情况、农场收入情况、农场经营稳定性、政策支持程度、主要发展困境以及未来预期等八个方面对市场主导型家庭农场和政府主导型家庭农场进行了对比,得出以下结论：在家庭农场经营规模上,与市场主导型家庭农场相对比,政府主导型家庭农场明显具有更大的农地经营规模；在流转期限方面,政府主导型家庭农场流转期限比市场主导型家庭农场平均长3.2年,并且具有更强烈的意愿进行长期经营；在农场注册方面,是否为政府主导型家庭农场与是否注册显著正相关,政府主导型家庭农场更倾向于进行登记注册；在合约稳定性方面,政府主导型家庭农场更倾向于合约不可更改性。因此,与市场主导型家庭农场相比,政府主导型家庭农场在经营稳定性上更具有优势。而在其他方面,二者没有明显的区别。据此笔者提出以下建议：一是充分发挥政府在家庭农场形成和发展中的服务作用,完善注册登记制；规范家庭农场管理,加强政策支持力度；推进农业保险试点,建立完善农业保险制度。二是加快农地流转,促进土地适度集中。三是将提高农民收入作为根本出发点和落脚点。本文的论述主要从六个方面展开：第一章为引言,主要包括本文的研究背景、选题意义、研究思路和方法、整体框架和主要内容以及可能的创新点与不足；第二章主要是对现有文献进行总结,从国内和国外两个方面进行家庭农场已有研究的概括并对文献进行评价；第三章主要提出本文的理论基础,并明确相关概念。第四章是对市场主导型家庭农场和政府主导型家庭农场进行要素分析,主要从农场主个人情况、农地流转情况、农场融资方式、农场成本收益、农场经营稳定性、农场政策支持和未来预期这些方面进行比较,把握二者的异同点；第五章是本文关键部分,在描述性统计基础上,进行计量分析。主要运用半对数线性模型以及logistic模型,将几个重要指标作为被解释变量,将是否是政府主导型家庭农场作为关键的解释变量,分析其影响是否显著,又在多大程度上产生了影响。第六章总结结论,并提出政策建议。
[Abstract]:The eighteen Party Congress "cultivating new business entities, the development of various forms of construction scale, intensification, specialization, organization, new agricultural management system of social integration, 2013 central document further pointed out that" encourage and support the contracted land to professional large, family farms, farmers' cooperatives circulation, development various forms of moderate scale management. The party and the government at the policy level on the transformation of the mode of agricultural operation, attaches great importance to the development of family farms to promote the rapid development of family farms in the practice, the special circumstances according to the local development of different forms of family farms and have achieved effective results. The formation process of government involvement as according to the classification standard of the family farm, it will be divided into market oriented family farms and government oriented family farms. Leading and government of market oriented These two types of family farms in a comparative study, to explore the similarities and differences between the two, is the purpose of this article. On the basis of which the author participated in the nine counties of Anhui and Henan two provinces five city (District) 278 family farm questionnaire investigation of the acquired, a comparative study of two different types of family farms similarities and differences. The family farmers individual characteristics, farm land transfer, farm financing, farm income, farm stability, policy support, the eight aspects of the plight of the main development and future expectations of market oriented family farms and government oriented family farms were compared, draw the following conclusions: in the family farm the scale of operation, compared with the market oriented family farm, the family farm has obvious government dominant farmland management scale larger; in the circulation period, government leading The family farm circulation period than the market leading family farms with an average length of 3.2 years, and has a strong desire for long-term business registration; on the farm, whether the government dominated family farm was positively correlated with whether the registration, the government dominated family farms tend to be registered in the contract; stability, government leading family farms tend to contract can not be changed. Therefore, compared with the market oriented family farm, the government dominated family farm has more advantages in operation and stability. On the other hand, the two have no obvious difference. The author put forward the following suggestions: one is to give full play to the government role in the development and formation of service on the family farm, perfect registration system; regulate the family farm management, strengthen policy support; promote agricultural insurance, establish and improve the agricultural insurance system. Two is to accelerate the circulation of agricultural land, promoting land moderate concentration. Three is to improve the income of the farmers as the starting point and final goal. This paper mainly from six aspects: the first chapter is the introduction, including research background, significance of the topic, research ideas and methods, the overall framework and main contents and possible innovation with insufficient; the second chapter is mainly about the literature review, research the existing family farm from two aspects at home and abroad summarized and evaluated the literature; the third chapter puts forward the theoretical basis of this paper, and define the related concepts. The fourth chapter is the dominant family farm carries on the analysis of factors leading to the government and the family farm the market, mainly from individual farmers, farm land transfer, financing, farm income and cost, farm stability, farm policy support and future expectations Comparison of these aspects, grasp the similarities and differences between the two; the fifth chapter is the key part in the descriptive statistics on the basis of quantitative analysis. Mainly uses the semi log linear model and logistic model, the several important indicators as explanatory variables, whether is the government led the family farm as the key explanatory variables, analysis of the effect is significant, and the influence of the extent. The sixth chapter summarizes the conclusions and policy recommendations.

【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F324.1

【相似文献】