三权分置背景下土地承包经营权的分离与重构

发布时间：2018-04-23 21:42

本文选题：三权分置 + 集体土地所有权　；参考：《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：新一轮农村土地制度改革的政策意蕴是,最大限度地剥离土地承包经营权超载的、原本属于集体土地所有权的、公法层面的生活保障功能和农村治理功能,使土地承包经营权回复完全的物权属性。由于现行法律将土地承包权的内容附着在土地承包经营权上进行一体规定,集体土地所有权的功能内容迁及到土地承包经营权,因此将土地承包权从土地承包经营权中分离出来是使土地承包经营权回复物权属性并达到改革目的的根本方法,其中土地承包权是成员权的具体权能,是取得土地承包经营权的前提,这与三权分置下的土地承包权不是一个概念。土地承包经营权分离出土地承包权而形成的这个新权利将具备包括抵押在内的完全的处分权能,其应当沿用土地承包经营权的权利名称,并应当采取登记生效主义模式设立。
[Abstract]:The policy implication of the new round of rural land system reform is that the functions of life security and rural governance in the level of public law, originally belonging to collective land ownership and overloaded land contractual management rights, are stripped to the maximum extent. Land contractual management right to return to complete property attributes. As the contents of the land contract right are attached to the land contract management right by the existing law, the functional contents of the collective land ownership right are transferred to the land contract management right. Therefore, separating the land contract right from the land contract management right is the fundamental method to make the land contract management right return to the attribute of real right and achieve the purpose of reform, in which the land contract right is the specific power of the member right. It is the premise of obtaining the land contract management right, which is not a concept with the land contract right under the three rights division. The new right formed by the separation of the land contracting right from the land contracting right will have the complete disposition power including mortgage. It should follow the right name of the land contract management right and should be established in the mode of registration and effectivism.
【作者单位】：大连海事大学法学院;
【基金】：辽宁省社会科学基金项目(L14BFX008) 中央高校基金科研业务费专项(3132015118)
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】