基于CE的不同流向下农地城市流转负外部效应研究

发布时间：2018-05-06 15:53

本文选题：农地城市流转 + 流向　；参考：《中国人口·资源与环境》2017年01期

【摘要】：发展与保护的权衡是土地资源配置中难以回避的棘手问题。农地城市流转在为城镇化的快速推进提供土地要素的同时,却也在社会、生态方面引起一系列外部性损失,已有研究认为该损失的大小与农地城市流转的用途和周围环境有关,但并未进一步定量揭示其关联程度。鉴于此,本文将农地城市流转的去向归纳为住宅及商服用地、工矿仓储及交通运输用地、公共管理与公共服务用地三类,以武汉市和鄂州市作为研究区域,运用选择实验法(CE)以及多元Logit模型(MNL)识别了受访者对于农地城市流转负外部效应治理方案的偏好,从而间接测度了不同流向下农地城市流转负外部效应的经济总量,以期为实施农地城市流转的用途和规模管制提供依据。结果表明:1不同流向下农地城市流转产生的交通状况恶化、噪音污染、公共设施不足等七种类别负外部效应在类型和强度上有所差异;2绝大多数居民对治理农地城市流转的负外部性具有支付意愿,且在参与程度和参与强度(支付额)方面因农地城市流转的不同流向而有所区别,并且居民的受教育程度和家庭收入水平对选择效用的影响具有显著性且呈正相关关系;3不同流向下农地城市流转所产生的负外部效应的经济总量不容忽视,三种流向的负外部效应从大到小依次为农地流转为工矿仓储及交通运输用地、公共管理与公共服务用地、住宅及商服用地。因此,作为农地城市流转的管制主体,各级政府应当采用经济性管制与社会性管制并举的多样化管制手段对农地城市流转的用途和规模予以调控和管制。
[Abstract]:The trade-off between development and protection is a difficult problem in the allocation of land resources. While providing land elements for the rapid development of urbanization, the transfer of agricultural land cities also causes a series of external losses in the social and ecological aspects. It has been considered that the size of the loss is related to the use of agricultural land and the surrounding environment. But it does not reveal its correlation degree quantitatively further. In view of this, this paper sums up the destination of farmland urban circulation into three categories: residential and commercial land, industrial and mining storage and transportation land, public management and public service land, with Wuhan and Ezhou as the research areas. By using the selective experiment method (CEE) and the multivariate Logit model (MNLs), this paper identifies the preference of interviewees for the treatment of negative external effects of rural land transfer, and indirectly measures the total economic volume of the negative external effects of rural land transfer under different flow directions. The aim is to provide the basis for the use and scale control of farmland urban circulation. The results show that the traffic situation and noise pollution caused by the circulation of rural land cities under different flow directions of the rural land under the different flow direction of 1: 1 are deteriorated. There are differences in the types and intensity of negative external effects in seven categories, such as inadequate public facilities. 2. Most of the residents have a willingness to pay for the negative externalities of rural land transfer. And the degree of participation and the intensity of participation (payment amount) are different from each other because of the different flow of rural land circulation. Moreover, the educational level of residents and the level of household income have a significant and positive correlation with the impact of the choice utility. 3 the negative external effects of rural land transfer in different flows can not be ignored. The three negative external effects from big to small are agricultural land circulation, industrial and mining storage and transportation land, public management and public service land, residential and commercial land. Therefore, as the main control body of farmland urban circulation, governments at all levels should adopt the diversified means of economic regulation and social regulation to regulate and control the use and scale of agricultural land urban circulation.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学工商管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“基于负外部性治理的农地城市流转管制研究”(批准号:71303260) 国家留学基金项目“农地用途转换的社会、生态影响及其管制研究”(批准号:201607085005)
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】