农地经营权主体差异与农地抵押方式选择——基于市场与组织合约的分类视角

发布时间：2018-05-13 15:39

本文选题：农地经营权 + 农户　；参考：《中南财经政法大学学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文立足市场与组织合约的分类视角,通过选取以农户为抵押主体的同心与平罗、以规模经营主体为抵押主体的明溪与枣庄这两对典型案例的对比,探讨农地经营权主体与农地抵押合约方式选择之间的联系,结果表明:在农地抵押中存在直接与间接定价的合约方式差异,且农户和规模经营主体这两类主体倾向于选择不同的抵押合约;当农户作为抵押主体时,采用组织合约的间接方式优于选择市场合约的直接方式;而当规模经营主体作为抵押主体时,以市场合约的直接抵押方式要优于采用组织合约的间接抵押方式。就此,提出考虑抵押主体差异、鼓励具有信息收集与定价功能的主体参与抵押进程、推进"三权分置"改革和活化农地经营权等政策建议。
[Abstract]:Based on the classification perspective of market and organization contract, this paper compares the typical cases of Mingxi and Zaozhuang with farmers as the principal mortgage and Pingluo as the mortgage subject and the scale management as the main mortgage. This paper discusses the relationship between the subject of farmland management right and the choice of contract mode of farmland mortgage. The results show that there are differences between direct and indirect pricing contract modes in farmland mortgage. The farmer and the scale main body tend to choose the different mortgage contract, when the farmer is the mortgage subject, the indirect way of the organization contract is better than the direct way of choosing the market contract. The direct mortgage of the market contract is better than the indirect mortgage with the organization contract when the main body of the scale operation is the principal part of the mortgage. In this paper, the author puts forward some policy suggestions, such as considering the difference of mortgage subject, encouraging the subject with information collection and pricing function to participate in the mortgage process, promoting the reform of "three rights division" and activating the farmland management right.
【作者单位】：南京农业大学公共管理学院;南京财经大学粮食安全与战略研究中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“农地流转模式、流转契约与农业规模经营模式组合:驱动力、绩效与机制设计”(71373127) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“我国土地出让制度改革及收益共享机制研究”(13JZD014) 国家社会科学基金项目“西部地区农村土地承包经营权流转问题研究”(10BJY063) “清华农村研究博士论文奖学金”项目“农地流转的交易费用与合约选择研究”(201510)
【分类号】：F321.1;F832.43

【相似文献】