浙江省财政支出结构对经济增长和社会公平的影响分析
发布时间:2018-02-24 00:22
本文关键词: 经济增长 社会公平 地方财政支出结构 社会性支出 经济性支出 维持性支出 出处:《浙江财经大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:效率和公平作为经济学的两大基本原则,也是指导财政支出如何合理有效安排的主要原则。罗纳德·费雪(Ronald C.Fisher)指出,地方财政支出状况关系到财政的资源配置、收入分配和经济稳定三大职能的实现。社会经济的稳定与发展态势是财政资源有效配置的综合结果,也是兼顾效率和公平的体现。近年来,浙江省经济实现了快速平稳增长,但是社会公平问题凸显。在这样的形势下,选取一定的经济标准和社会标准,研究1990年~2011年浙江省财政支出结构变化轨迹及其对经济增长和社会发展的影响,从而提出浙江省政府调整和优化地方财政支出结构的具体政策建议。 本文利用经济增长和社会公平双重标准来衡量浙江省财政支出结构优化状况,运用理论分析和实证分析的研究方法,探讨浙江省财政支出中的三类支出项目各自对经济增长和社会公平的影响程度,以更深入地把握地方政府财政支出结构的经济效应和社会效应状况。本文从三个层面展开分析:在理论上,主要通过宏观经济模型推导和财政支出对经济增长和社会公平的影响机制进行分析。在统计描述上,利用整理到的数据,在详细研究浙江省的财政支出总量和结构的基础上,对浙江省的经济增长和社会公平状况进行了分析。在实证上,本文通过建立一个包含经济标准和社会标准双重指标的联立方程模型来分析浙江省财政支出中的不同分类支出项目对经济增长和社会公平的影响程度。 通过Eviews5.0检验结果显示:浙江省财政支出结构与经济增长和社会公平存在着高度相关。随着浙江省经济发展水平的不断提高,地方维持性支出的过度扩张开始对当地经济增长和社会公平产生负面影响,主要原因是政府人员膨胀、人员经费支出过大等问题,使得维持性支出规模超过临界点,支出效益低下。与维持性支出的经济效应和社会效应相似,经济性支出与经济增长和社会公平也呈现负相关。一般来说,,一个地方的经济发展水平应该与各项地方财政支出的产出弹性相适应。近年来,浙江省经济性支出处于饱和状态,比重超出合理的比例范围,所以其产出弹性也越来越小,不再具有显著的生产性。与前两类支出相比较,浙江省的社会性支出与经济增长和社会公平之间正相关,说明科学、教育、文化、卫生和社会保障等方面支出能够促进经济增长,但是对经济增长的贡献缺乏弹性。同时浙江省社会性支出额的增加,就有明显的改善社会公平的效应。 基于以上实证研究结论,本文给出了浙江省政府调整财政支出结构的具体政策建议:浙江省政府应该压缩维持性支出规模,并加强这项支出的管理,提高政府的运作效率和公共服务水平;降低经济性支出在财政总支出中的比重,使其保持在一定量的支出比例,与浙江省的经济发展水平相适应;加大社会性支出的力度,充分发挥其在经济增长和社会公平方面的有利效应。
[Abstract]:Efficiency and fairness as the two basic principles of economics, but also guide the main principles of fiscal expenditure how reasonable and effective arrangement. Ronald Fisher (Ronald C.Fisher) pointed out that the local fiscal expenditure in relation to the financial resource allocation, income distribution and economic stability to achieve three functions. The stability and development trend of social economy is the result of comprehensive financial resources the effective allocation, but also reflects the balance between efficiency and equity. In recent years, Zhejiang province has achieved rapid economic steady growth, but the social fairness problem is prominent. In such a situation, select a certain economic and social standard, influence of Zhejiang province in 1990 ~2011 years, the fiscal expenditure structure changes and development of economic growth and the society, so as to put forward specific policy recommendations to local fiscal expenditure structure of Zhejiang province government adjustment and optimization.
This paper uses a double standard to measure the economic growth and social equity in the expenditure structure of Zhejiang province optimization condition, by using research methods of theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, we discuss three kinds of expenditure of fiscal expenditure of Zhejiang Province in the economic growth and social equity, to better grasp the economic effect and social effect of local government. The structure of fiscal expenditure. This paper from three aspects: in theory, mainly through the macroeconomic model and analysis of fiscal expenditure on economic growth and social equity impact mechanism. In the statistical description, used to collate the data, based on the detailed research of Zhejiang province's total fiscal expenditure and structure. In Zhejiang province's economic growth and social equity status were analyzed. In the empirical research, this paper establishes a economic and social standard double The simultaneous equation model of the index is used to analyze the impact of different classified expenditure items on economic growth and social equity in Zhejiang's fiscal expenditure.
Through the Eviews5.0 test results showed that: Zhejiang province fiscal expenditure structure and economic growth and social equity. There is a high correlation with the level of economic development in Zhejiang province continues to improve, the excessive expansion of local maintenance expenditure to justice have a negative impact on local economic growth and society, the main reason is the expansion of government personnel, personnel expenditures. So, the maintenance expenditure is larger than the critical point, the low expenditure benefit. Similar economic effects of maintenance expenditure and social effect, economic expenditure and economic growth and social equity also showed a negative correlation. In general, a local economic development level should be commensurate with the output elasticity of the local fiscal expenditure. In recent years, Zhejiang province economic expenditure is saturated, the proportion exceeded the reasonable proportion, so the output elasticity is also more and more small, no longer out Production significantly. Compared with the former two types of expenditure, Zhejiang province social expenditure and economic growth and social equity is related to science, education, culture, health and social security expenditure can promote economic growth, but the contribution to economic growth in Zhejiang province. At the same time increase the lack of flexibility of society spending, have significantly improved social equity effect.
Conclusion based on the above empirical research, this paper gives the specific policy of the government of Zhejiang province to adjust the structure of financial expenditure proposals: the government of Zhejiang province should reduce the maintenance expenditure, and strengthen the expenditure management, improve government efficiency and public service level; reduce the economic expenditure in total expenditure in the proportion. Keep in a certain amount of expenditure in Zhejiang Province, and adapt to the economic development level; increase social spending, give full play to its beneficial effects on economic growth and social justice.
【学位授予单位】:浙江财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F812.45;F124.1;F124.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王斌;关于我国财政收支增长与经济增长的实证分析[J];北京机械工业学院学报;2000年04期
2 崔兴芳;吕冰洋;;国家财政和地方财政支出规模与经济增长关系——基于时间序列和横截面数据的分析[J];中共长春市委党校学报;2006年04期
3 廖楚晖;余可;;地方政府公共支出结构与经济增长——基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J];财贸经济;2006年11期
4 刘成奎;王朝才;;财政分权与农村公路供给——以我国省级面板数据为例[J];财贸研究;2008年01期
5 洪江;;我国财政支出的公平性研究[J];石家庄经济学院学报;2007年01期
6 杨继,刘柯杰;中国财政支出增长的实证分析[J];上海经济研究;2002年09期
7 马拴友;中国公共资本与私人部门经济增长的实证分析[J];经济科学;2000年06期
8 郭庆旺,吕冰洋,张德勇;财政支出结构与经济增长[J];经济理论与经济管理;2003年11期
9 高培勇;;公共财政:概念界说与演变脉络——兼论中国财政改革30年的基本轨迹[J];经济研究;2008年12期
10 孙文祥,张志超;财政支出结构对经济增长与社会公平的影响[J];上海财经大学学报;2004年06期
本文编号:1528175
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1528175.html