中国式分权与城乡居民收入不平等——基于预算内外双重维度的实证考察

发布时间：2018-04-01 16:43

本文选题：中国式分权　切入点：预算内外　出处：《财贸经济》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文首先从预算内外两个维度理论诠释收支分权对收入不平等的作用机制,然后在对城乡居民收入基尼系数和中国式分权水平进行重新测度的基础上建立面板数据模型,从全国和分区域视角实证考察了中国式分权对城乡居民收入不平等的影响。研究发现:(1)无论是全国还是分区域,预算内收入分权的提升均有利于降低城乡居民收入不平等;(2)预算内支出分权的提升虽然从全国来看会加剧城乡居民收入不平等,但在预算内支出分权水平相对较低的中西部地区,仍可以显著降低城乡居民收入不平等;(3)预算外收支分权对全国与东中西部地区的城乡居民收入不平等的影响具有一致性,即预算外收入分权使城乡居民收入不平等愈加恶化,而预算外支出分权却不同程度地降低了城乡居民收入不平等;(4)转移支付、受教育年限和城镇登记失业率对城乡居民收入不平等亦有推波助澜之效,但经济发展水平、城镇化和对外开放度对城乡居民收入不平等的影响具有显著的地区差异。本文结论不仅对中国式分权体制的进一步完善与重塑公平效率机制具有一定的借鉴意义,而且还可以为新一轮财税体制改革指明方向。
[Abstract]:This paper first explains the mechanism of income inequality caused by the decentralization of income and expenditure from the perspective of budget and internal and external dimensions, and then establishes a panel data model on the basis of re-measuring the income Gini coefficient of urban and rural residents and the level of Chinese decentralization.The influence of Chinese decentralization on income inequality of urban and rural residents is investigated empirically from national and sub-regional perspectives.The study found that (1) the increase in budgetary income decentralization is conducive to reducing income inequality among urban and rural residents, regardless of whether it is national or sub-regional. ((!!! 2) the increase in budget expenditure decentralization will increase income inequality among urban and rural residents, although from a national perspective, it will increase income inequality among urban and rural residents.However, in the central and western regions, where the level of budget decentralization is relatively low, the income inequality of urban and rural residents can still be significantly reduced. (3) the effect of extra-budgetary decentralization on income inequality of urban and rural residents in China is consistent with that in eastern, western and western regions.That is, extra-budgetary income decentralization makes income inequality of urban and rural residents worse, while extra-budgetary expenditure decentralization reduces income inequality of urban and rural residents in varying degrees.The years of education and the urban registered unemployment rate also contributed to the income inequality of urban and rural residents, but the economic development level, urbanization and the degree of opening to the outside world had significant regional differences on the income inequality of urban and rural residents.The conclusion of this paper not only has certain reference significance for the further perfection of the Chinese decentralization system and remolding the fair efficiency mechanism, but also can point out the direction for the new round of fiscal and taxation system reform.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学;安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院;国家税务总局党校;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“财税政策提升战略性新兴产业创新绩效的激励机制与效应比较研究”(16AJY022) 安徽省自然科学基金“政府民生性支出的利益归宿及其形成机制研究”(1508085MG139)
【分类号】：F124.7;F812.2

【相似文献】