差序信任机制的时空流变及其类型分化——以转型中国加速网络化为分析背景

发布时间：2018-04-17 17:10

  本文选题：差序信任 + 流动　； 参考：《浙江社会科学》2017年10期

【摘要】：在流动社会中,中国遭遇的"信任之困"虽与西方社会有着相同的现代性逻辑,但其背后却潜藏着一个"中国式的问题"。对此,学界形成了多元化的理论视角和丰富的研究成果,但总体而言仍存在研究区隔化、偏狭化及文化背景抽离化的问题。基于信任本质的时空特性,本文以转型中国加速网络化为分析背景,提出了"时空流变"这一整合性分析视角。分析发现,不同时空结构中的差序信任机制发生了分化,形成三个基本类型,即乡土社会的关系型差序信任(时空凝滞)、市场社会的工具型差序信任(时空分离)和网络社会的认同型差序信任(时空虚化)。研究结果表明,生发于乡土社会的差序信任机制并未随着社会的急剧变迁而迅速消解,相反,在特定的时空结构下,还有被复制和强化的可能。唯有细致考察差序信任机制的时空流变,我们才能深刻把握流动社会中复杂多元的信任秩序及"信任之困"问题的来龙去脉。
[Abstract]:In the floating society, although China has the same modern logic as the western society, there is a "Chinese problem" hidden behind it.In this regard, the academic circles have formed a diversified theoretical perspective and rich research results, but in general, there are still problems in the study of segregation, intolerance and cultural background separation.Based on the space-time characteristic of trust essence, this paper puts forward the integration analysis angle of "spatio-temporal evolution" based on the background of accelerated networking in China.It is found that the differential order trust mechanism in different temporal and spatial structures is divided into three basic types.That is, the relationship type of differential order trust in the local society (spatio-temporal stagnation), the instrumental type of market society of the differential order trust (space-time separation) and the network society of the identity type of the differential order trust (space-time vacuity).The results show that the mechanism of differential order trust which originated in the local society does not dissolve rapidly with the rapid changes of the society. On the contrary, under the specific space-time structure, it is possible to replicate and strengthen the mechanism.Only by carefully investigating the temporal and spatial evolution of the differential trust mechanism, can we profoundly grasp the complex and pluralistic trust order and the "trust dilemma" in the floating society.
【作者单位】： 南京大学社会学院;中共杭州市委党校;
【基金】：笔者主持的浙江省社科规划项目《基于信任分析的网络舆论冲突及弥合研究》(编号:17NDJC297YB)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F124
，

本文编号：1764490