中部地区产业结构演进与新型城镇化互动关系研究
本文选题:中部地区 + 产业结构演进 ; 参考:《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:产业结构演进与新型城镇化是当前经济建设的主题。研究两者的发展特征及两者之间的相互关系对于正确把握新常态下我国区域结构调整,清醒认识区域内部存在的结构性矛盾,进而谋划新时期区域经济发展战略,培育增强经济持续增长的内生活力和持久动力都具有重要意义。现阶段,中部地区新型城镇化水平与全国平均水平还有一定的差距,产业结构也存在结构性偏差,因此,在新常态下厘清两者互动机制,推动两者互动发展至关重要。本文首先通过文献回顾,梳理了产业结构演进与新型城镇化的内涵,构建了两者指标体系,进而对两者的互动机理进行了理论分析,并建立了两者互动框架。其次,选择中部地区为研究对象,综合运用熵权法和加权汇总的方法对两者发展水平分别进行了测度。再次,梳理了两者互动的内涵与表征,并运用耦合协调度模型对两者互动状态进行了测度与分析。最后通过相关性分析、平稳性检验、协整分析、Granger因果检验等计量方法对产业结构演进与新型城镇化的互动关系进行了实证分析。分析结果发现:(1)现阶段,两者互动发展协调性不够,缺乏一定的持续互动发展能力;(2)新型城镇化滞后于产业结构演进;(3)第一产业在很大程度上阻碍了新型城镇化的进程,第二产业是目前新型城镇化发展的主要动力,第三产业发展不足未能有效促进新型城镇化发展;(4)新型城镇化指数与产值结构指数、就业结构指数之间存在协整关系;(5)新型城镇化指数是产值结构指数、就业结构指数的Granger原因,但反向不具有这种关系,产值结构指数与就业结构指数互为Granger原因。进一步分析认为导致这些问题的主要原因有三点:(1)中部地区农业人口众多,存在先天制约;(2)产业发展不合理,第三产业发展不足,劳动人口未能合理转移;(3)城镇功能不完善,未能发挥产业集聚的规模效应。据此,本文从推进技术创新、促进要素流动、完善城镇功能和提供政策保障四方面提出了相应的政策建议,以期促进中部地区产业结构演进与新型城镇化良性互动,共同发展。
[Abstract]:The evolution of industrial structure and new urbanization are the theme of current economic construction. The study of the development characteristics of the two and the relationship between them are helpful to grasp correctly the adjustment of regional structure in China under the new normal, to soberly understand the structural contradictions existing within the region, and then to plan the development strategy of regional economy in the new period. It is of great significance to cultivate endogenous vitality and lasting power to enhance sustained economic growth. At present, there is still a certain gap between the new urbanization level and the national average level in the central region, and the industrial structure also has structural deviation. Therefore, it is very important to clarify the interaction mechanism between the two in the new normal state and promote their interactive development. This paper firstly combs the connotation of industrial structure evolution and new urbanization through literature review, constructs the index system of both, and then makes a theoretical analysis of the interaction mechanism of the two, and establishes the interactive framework between the two. Secondly, the central region is chosen as the research object, and the development level of the two regions is measured by the entropy weight method and the weighted summary method. Thirdly, the connotation and representation of the interaction are combed, and the interaction state is measured and analyzed by using the coupling coordination degree model. Finally, by means of correlation analysis, stability test, cointegration analysis and Granger causality test, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the interactive relationship between industrial structure evolution and new urbanization. The results show that at the present stage, the interaction between the two is not coordinated enough, and they lack the ability to develop continuously. (2) the new type of urbanization lags behind the evolution of industrial structure and the first industry largely hinders the process of new type urbanization. The secondary industry is the main driving force for the development of the new type of urbanization at present. The lack of development of the tertiary industry has failed to effectively promote the development of the new type of urbanization. (4) the new type of urbanization index and the output value structure index. The new type of urbanization index is the Granger cause of output value structure index and employment structure index, but there is no such relationship in reverse. The output value structure index and employment structure index are mutual Granger reasons. Further analysis shows that the main reasons leading to these problems are three points: 1) the central region has a large agricultural population, there are congenital constraints on the development of the industry, the development of the tertiary industry is insufficient, and the working population fails to reasonably transfer the functions of the cities and towns. Fail to exert the scale effect of industrial agglomeration. Accordingly, this paper puts forward the corresponding policy suggestions from four aspects of promoting technological innovation, promoting the flow of elements, perfecting the functions of cities and towns and providing policy guarantee, in order to promote the evolution of industrial structure in the central region and the benign interaction between the new type of urbanization and the development of the industrial structure in the central region.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F127;F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 阮陆宁;张华东;;中部地区新型城镇化质量动态综合评价[J];商业经济研究;2016年14期
2 周荣蓉;;产业结构与就业结构互动关系的实证分析[J];统计与决策;2016年10期
3 王毅;丁正山;余茂军;尚正永;宋晓雨;常夏洁;;基于耦合模型的现代服务业与城市化协调关系量化分析——以江苏省常熟市为例[J];地理研究;2015年01期
4 杨立勋;姜增明;;产业结构与城镇化匹配协调及其效率分析[J];经济问题探索;2013年10期
5 沈正平;;优化产业结构与提升城镇化质量的互动机制及实现途径[J];城市发展研究;2013年05期
6 杜传忠;刘英基;郑丽;;基于系统耦合视角的中国工业化与城镇化协调发展实证研究[J];江淮论坛;2013年01期
7 倪鹏飞;;新型城镇化的基本模式、具体路径与推进对策[J];江海学刊;2013年01期
8 郝俊卿;曹明明;;区域产业结构演进与城市化发展关系研究——以关中地区为例[J];西北大学学报(自然科学版);2012年01期
9 干春晖;郑若谷;余典范;;中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J];经济研究;2011年05期
10 戴永安;陈才;;东北地区城市化与产业结构演进的互动机制研究[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 崔宏桥;城镇化进程中吉林省服务业结构演进与协同发展评价研究[D];吉林大学;2014年
2 易善策;产业结构演进与城镇化互动发展研究[D];武汉大学;2011年
3 周维富;中国工业化与城市化协调发展论[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 薛源;成渝城市群产业结构演进与城镇化协调发展研究[D];西南大学;2016年
2 吴超;合肥市产业结构与城镇化互动关系研究[D];安徽大学;2016年
3 孙春霖;服务业集聚、产业升级与城镇化的协同关系研究[D];山东大学;2015年
4 杨志敏;山西省产业结构演进与城镇化发展的现状及关系研究[D];山西师范大学;2013年
5 韩峰;湖南省城市化与产业结构演进互动研究[D];湖南大学;2009年
,本文编号:1884292
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1884292.html