非股权经营模式与中国全球价值链分工地位的提升研究
发布时间:2018-06-20 00:23
本文选题:非股权经营模式 + 全球价值链 ; 参考:《天津财经大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着科技的进步,国际分工日益细化,对全球价值链的管理也开始向多元化发展,越来越多的跨国公司开始将生产过程的非核心环节外包给东道国企业。非股权经营方式具有风险小、成本低、经营灵活等特点,东道国企业可以学习跨国公司先进的生产技术和管理理念,通过技术的积累,发展中国家可以不断提升全球价值链上的位置。本文在国内外学者关于非股权经营模式以及全球价值链治理的研究成果的基础上,首先总结了全球价值链的特点和影响因素以及企业参与全球价值链的主要方式,并且结合2011年和2013年世界投资报告的相关数据,研究了非股权经营模式的主要形式和发展现状;其次分别从动机的角度和全球价值链的管理角度两个层面对非股权经营模式进行了分类,从动机的角度可以将非股权经营模式分为资源寻求型、效率寻求型和市场寻求型,从全球价值链的管理角度可以将非股权经营模式分为俘获型、关联型以及模块型;在对非股权经营模式进行分类的前提下探究了非股权经营模式发展的动因以及不同类型的非股权经营模式对全球价值链的地位提升所产生的影响,本文的研究结果表明对于发达国家而言,非股权经营模式发展的动因是能够减少成本、降低风险,而对于发展中国家而言,通过非股权经营模式可以更多地参与到全球价值链中去。非股权经营模式对价值链的地位提升的差异性主要体现在资源寻求型和市场寻求型能够有效提高欠发达地区全球价值链的参与程度,并且通过技术外溢发展中国家有机会向价值链的高端移动,而效率寻求型的模式能够帮助发达国家整合资源从事核心环节的生产,进而能提高经营效率;在此基础上以合同制造和服务外包为例,将中国的非股权经营模式和全球价值链的分工地位分别与发达国家和发展中国家作了对比,指出了中国的非股权经营模式存在哪些不足以及在全球价值链上的分工地位;基于对比,对提升中国全球价值链分工地位提出了三点政策建议,首先将与非股权经营模式相关的政策纳入到国家发展战略中去,其次利用本国的技术创新提高在国际分工中的地位,最后通过人才培养从事更多的高技术活动。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the international division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, and the management of global value chain is becoming more and more diversified. More and more multinational corporations begin to outsource the non-core links in the production process to the host country enterprises. Non-equity management is characterized by low risk, low cost, flexible management, and so on. Enterprises in host countries can learn the advanced production technology and management concepts of multinational corporations, and through the accumulation of technology, Developing countries can continue to upgrade their position in global value chains. Based on the research results of non-equity management model and global value chain governance at home and abroad, this paper first summarizes the characteristics and influencing factors of global value chain and the main ways for enterprises to participate in global value chain. Combined with the data of the World Investment report in 2011 and 2013, the paper studies the main forms and development status of the non-equity business model. Secondly, it classifies the non-equity management model from the angle of motivation and the management of global value chain. From the angle of motivation, the non-equity management model can be divided into three types: resource seeking, efficiency seeking and market seeking. From the perspective of global value chain management, the non-equity management model can be divided into capture type, association type and module type; On the premise of classifying the non-equity management mode, this paper probes into the motivation of the development of the non-equity management model and the influence of different types of non-equity management mode on the status of the global value chain. The results of this paper show that for developed countries, the motivation of the development of non-equity management model is to reduce costs and risks, while for developing countries, Through the non-equity management model, we can participate more in the global value chain. The difference between non-equity management mode and value chain is that resource seeking and market seeking can effectively improve the participation of global value chain in less developed regions. And through technology spillover developing countries have the opportunity to move to the high end of the value chain, while the efficiency seeking model can help developed countries integrate resources to engage in the production of core links, and then improve the operational efficiency; On this basis, taking contract manufacturing and service outsourcing as an example, this paper compares China's non-equity management model and the division of labor status of global value chain with those of developed countries and developing countries, respectively. This paper points out the shortcomings of China's non-equity management model and its position in the global value chain, and puts forward three policy recommendations to promote the division of labor in China's global value chain based on the comparison. Firstly, the policies related to the non-equity management model are incorporated into the national development strategy, secondly, the status of international division of labor is improved by using domestic technological innovation, and finally, more high-tech activities are carried out through the cultivation of talents.
【学位授予单位】:天津财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F124;F114.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯志坚;;垂直专业化的决定因素与国际贸易——基于中国工业行业数据的经验研究[J];统计与信息论坛;2012年12期
2 辛娜;;我国外贸企业突破GVC低端锁定的路径分析[J];宜春学院学报;2012年09期
3 王仁荣;;蓬勃发展的跨国公司非实体模式(NEMs)国际化生产[J];上海经济;2011年12期
4 马春光;;《2011年世界投资报告》给我国餐饮连锁企业的启示与反思[J];企业经济;2011年11期
5 杨伟文;丰晓;;我国国际服务外包处于价值链低端的影响因素研究[J];经济经纬;2011年02期
6 郭炳南;黄太洋;;比较优势演化、全球价值链分工与中国产业升级[J];技术经济与管理研究;2010年S2期
7 张少军;东岗;;全球价值链下中国的对外贸易[J];经济理论与经济管理;2010年09期
8 徐礼伯;施建军;;基于中小企业角度:非股权战略联盟中不合作行为的成因与对策[J];技术经济与管理研究;2010年02期
9 施炳展;;中国出口产品的国际分工地位研究——基于产品内分工的视角[J];世界经济研究;2010年01期
10 杨丹辉;;服务外包与中国产业升级:基于全球化的视角[J];当代经济管理;2009年08期
,本文编号:2042023
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2042023.html