产业政策批判之再批判与“设计得当”的产业政策
发布时间：2018-07-21 09:37
【摘要】：以产业政策无用论和功能性产业政策主导说为代表的产业政策批判,由于混淆了产业政策理论的抽象性和一般性与产业政策实践的具体性和丰富性、面向历史的实证意义上的产业政策的合理性与面向未来的诊断意义上的产业政策的有效性之间的联系和边界,而对理论发展和实践指导形成误导。不应以中国过去产业政策的效果不显著、无效或负效应而否定产业政策本身的合理性以及未来通过改革和调整而提升中国产业政策积极效应的空间和可能性。产业政策的本质就是要通过结构性的或歧视性的措施适度干预市场结构和价格来解决市场本身不能有效解决的外部性问题、多主体协调问题和系统失败问题。中国的产业政策研究亟须超越"产业政策是否有效"的形而上讨论,在吸收和
[Abstract]:The criticism of industrial policy, represented by the useless theory of industrial policy and the leading theory of functional industrial policy, confuses the abstract and generality of industrial policy theory with the concreteness and richness of industrial policy practice. The relationship and boundary between the rationality of industrial policy in the sense of historical demonstration and the validity of industrial policy in the sense of future diagnosis mislead the development of theory and the guidance of practice. We should not deny the rationality of the industrial policy itself and the space and possibility of promoting the positive effect of China's industrial policy through reform and adjustment on the basis of the fact that the effect of China's past industrial policy is not remarkable, invalid or negative. The essence of industrial policy is to intervene the market structure and price appropriately through structural or discriminatory measures to solve the problems of externality, multi-agent coordination and system failure which cannot be effectively solved by the market itself. It is urgent for China's industrial policy research to go beyond the metaphysical discussion of "whether industrial policy is effective".
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“推进中国工业创新驱动发展研究”(14AJY016)
【分类号】：F120
[Abstract]:The criticism of industrial policy, represented by the useless theory of industrial policy and the leading theory of functional industrial policy, confuses the abstract and generality of industrial policy theory with the concreteness and richness of industrial policy practice. The relationship and boundary between the rationality of industrial policy in the sense of historical demonstration and the validity of industrial policy in the sense of future diagnosis mislead the development of theory and the guidance of practice. We should not deny the rationality of the industrial policy itself and the space and possibility of promoting the positive effect of China's industrial policy through reform and adjustment on the basis of the fact that the effect of China's past industrial policy is not remarkable, invalid or negative. The essence of industrial policy is to intervene the market structure and price appropriately through structural or discriminatory measures to solve the problems of externality, multi-agent coordination and system failure which cannot be effectively solved by the market itself. It is urgent for China's industrial policy research to go beyond the metaphysical discussion of "whether industrial policy is effective".
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“推进中国工业创新驱动发展研究”(14AJY016)
【分类号】：F120
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;越拟订优惠产业政策[J];技术经济信息;1994年08期
2 冯飞;关于产业政策的研究与思考[J];物资流通研究;2000年10期
3 ;产业政策简介[J];安徽决策咨询;2000年07期
4 ;国家将推出五类产业政策[J];勘察科学技术;2001年04期
5 志文;国家将推出五类产业政策[J];煤炭加工与综合利用;2001年04期
6 ;我国将推出5种类型产业政策[J];铁道物资科学管理;2001年02期
7 杨鹏;产业政策在中国的境遇——一位基层官员的实践体会[J];战略与管理;2001年02期
8 谢光飞;2003年产业政策重点圈定[J];政策w，
本文编号：2135103
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2135103.html
