供给侧结构性改革的中国特征及创新路径
发布时间:2019-05-21 13:46
【摘要】:中国供给侧结构性改革有不同于西方供给学派的理论与实践逻辑,是根植于中国经济新常态和中国特色社会主义政治经济学的发展要求。通过比较分析发现,供给侧结构性改革与供给学派不仅在理论基础、理论核心和理论实质的理论维度方面具有根本差异,而且供给侧结构性改革进行的“去产能、去杠杆、降成本、补短板”+改革的核心政策主张维度也与西方供给学派的“私有化、反通胀、减税和削减社会福利支出”政策主张存在明显差别,具有显著的中国式特征。因而,改革是推进供给侧结构性改革的基本路径,具体的创新就是以体制改革为关键点,结构改革为重点,社会福利体制改革为切入点,主动适应和引领经济新常态。
[Abstract]:The supply-side structural reform in China is different from the theoretical and practical logic of the western supply school, which is rooted in the new normal of Chinese economy and the development requirement of socialist political economy with Chinese characteristics. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the supply-side structural reform and the supply-side structural reform not only have fundamental differences in the theoretical basis, theoretical core and theoretical essence of the theoretical dimension, but also "de-capacity, deleveraging" carried out by the supply-side structural reform. The core policy proposition dimension of cost reduction and supplement deficiency reform is also obviously different from the western supply school's policy proposition of "privatization, anti-inflation, tax reduction and reduction of social welfare expenditure", which has remarkable Chinese characteristics. Therefore, reform is the basic way to promote supply-side structural reform, the specific innovation is to take the system reform as the key point, the structural reform as the key point, and the social welfare system reform as the starting point to adapt to and lead the new normal of the economy.
【作者单位】: 华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院;复旦大学;
【分类号】:F061.2
本文编号:2482136
[Abstract]:The supply-side structural reform in China is different from the theoretical and practical logic of the western supply school, which is rooted in the new normal of Chinese economy and the development requirement of socialist political economy with Chinese characteristics. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the supply-side structural reform and the supply-side structural reform not only have fundamental differences in the theoretical basis, theoretical core and theoretical essence of the theoretical dimension, but also "de-capacity, deleveraging" carried out by the supply-side structural reform. The core policy proposition dimension of cost reduction and supplement deficiency reform is also obviously different from the western supply school's policy proposition of "privatization, anti-inflation, tax reduction and reduction of social welfare expenditure", which has remarkable Chinese characteristics. Therefore, reform is the basic way to promote supply-side structural reform, the specific innovation is to take the system reform as the key point, the structural reform as the key point, and the social welfare system reform as the starting point to adapt to and lead the new normal of the economy.
【作者单位】: 华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院;复旦大学;
【分类号】:F061.2
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 高嵩;马续田:结构性改革或从财税及金融突破[N];中国保险报;2013年
2 傅云威;给中国结构性改革多点耐心[N];经济参考报;2014年
3 记者 张文绩;结构性改革到了十字路口[N];上海金融报;2008年
4 美国布鲁金斯学会高级研究员 李侃如 译 本报记者 李博雅;中国发展须重结构性改革[N];人民日报;2013年
5 本报记者 陈听雨;欧洲经济需要结构性改革[N];中国证券报;2013年
6 中国人民银行郑州培训学院教授 王勇;日本结构性改革剑指强化产业竞争力[N];证券时报;2013年
7 国泰君安证券首席分析师 任泽平;刺激是最大风险 结构性改革尚待加力[N];社会科学报;2014年
8 张军;不能再错失结构性改革的好时机[N];上海证券报;2008年
9 中国金融四十人论坛成员、德意志银行董事总经理、大中华区首席经济学家 马骏;区别周期性政策与结构性改革[N];21世纪经济报道;2012年
10 本报记者 陈听雨;希腊结构性改革无可回避[N];中国证券报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 阿利克;俄罗斯经济发展的分析与比较[D];首都经济贸易大学;2007年
,本文编号:2482136
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2482136.html