社会建构主义与灾害治理:一项自然灾害的社会学研究

发布时间：2018-02-24 16:20

本文关键词： 灾害社会建构主义功能主义社会脆弱性灾害社会学灾害治理　出处：《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：社会建构主义为灾害社会学研究提供了重要的"范式转移"及"反省机制",它主要有两个重要面向、六个基本维度和八个基本命题,建构要素包括建构主体、建构规则和建构话语三个维度,建构逻辑包括建构过程、建构表现和建构结果三个维度,前一面向是在论述灾害与社会的互动关系,后一面向则是基本分析框架,由此引发了"离灾"、非结构式减灾、风险治理、媒体责任、"隐性灾民"及不公平结构根源等重要治理启示。这一理论取向具有动态研究、从自然外部拉回社会内部、从悲观受害者向积极行动者转变等理论优势,但同时也存在着完整分析框架缺乏、实证研究困难、互构过程模糊、理论机制与逻辑关系不明、化约为权力与政治运作逻辑及对科技滥用意识形态批判等局限。
[Abstract]:Social constructivism provides important "paradigm shift" and "introspection mechanism" for the study of disaster sociology. It has two important aspects, six basic dimensions and eight basic propositions. The construction logic includes the construction process, the construction expression and the construction result. The former is the interactive relationship between disaster and society, and the latter is the basic analysis frame. This has led to important governance revelations such as "disaster relief", non-structural disaster reduction, risk management, media responsibility, "recessive disaster victims" and the root causes of unfair structure. This theoretical orientation has dynamic research and draws back to society from the outside of nature. The theoretical advantages from pessimistic victims to active actors exist in the absence of a complete analytical framework, difficulties in empirical research, ambiguity in the process of mutual construction, unclear theoretical mechanism and logical relationship. It is limited by the logic of power and political operation and the criticism of the ideology of misuse of science and technology.
【作者单位】：广州大学共公管理学院;
【基金】：广州市哲学社会学科学“十二五”规划课题(13Y16) 国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BSH024)
【分类号】：X43

【共引文献】