基于区间数AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理综合评价

  本文关键词：基于区间数AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理综合评价，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

基于区间数AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理综合评价

作者：1”的相关文章'>易欣1 ”的相关文章'>2  1”的相关文章'>张飞涟1  1”的相关文章'>邱慧1 

单位：1. 中南大学土木工程学院,长沙 410075;
2. 华东交通大学土木建筑学院,南昌 330013

关键词：安全管理工程 区间数AHP Vague集 安全综合评价 施工现场 

分类号：X948; TU714

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2012··第4期（229-233）

摘要：

施工现场安全分析中存在模糊性和难以分辨性的问题。根据相关法律、法规和规范,首先从安全生产管理制度、安全教育与宣传、安全生产、安全管理组织机构、劳动保护等方面构建了施工现场安全管理的评价指标体系,然后使用区间数AHP给各指标赋权; 再基于Vague集理论建立了施工现场安全的改进模糊综合评价数学模型;最后进行了实证分析。结果表明该方法能够反映工地的现场安全管理情况。

The given paper takes it as its mission to develop a safety comprehensive evaluation method to change the passive accidents-prevention situation into an active guard-against strategy. As we know, in the construction site safety analysis field,there always exist ambiguity or uncertainty against production safety and security and the necessity to pursue appropriate measures to guarantee the problem of safe production. To solve such a problem, the present paper intends to establish an evaluation index system for the construction site safety management. Based on the study of the relevant laws,rules and production regulations, first of all, we have got to know that all the following indices are of primary importance: the safety operation regulations and standards, safety education and publicity, safety construction and safety management organization, labor protection and safeguard, etc. Secondly, to make sure all the above mentioned indices’ weights in proper place in accordance with the production demands, it would be necessary to introduce the interval Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) into our study. In comparison with the traditional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we have put forward an improved weight-providing means, which can, to some extent, settle the uncertain problem of expert’s judgment for such an expert’s judgment cannot provide a hundred-per-cent assurance. Thirdly, based on the fuzzy sets theory, we have set up a melioration fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for construction site safety control. Since the fuzzy sets theory is dynamic and characteristic of full-scale information, which can help to better reflect the above said indices. And, finally, corresponding empirical analysis should also be prudently included so as to justify the theory concerned. Thus, it is always necessary to make a more all-around comprehensive conclusion based on the common fuzzy evaluation problems based on the fuzzy sets theory. The results of our investigation prove that the method developed by us can accurately and effectively reflect the objective situation demands for safety control of the construction site, on the condition that precautions and preventive measures should be set out in case any accidents may take place.

参考文献：

[1] LAI Yongbao(来永宝). Innovation: enterprise safety culture[J]. Journal of Jiaying University(嘉应大学学报), 2003, 21(4): 33-35.
[2] TIAN Yuanfu(田元福), LI Huimin(李慧民). Current status and ponder over the management in construction safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal(中国安全科学学报), 2003, 13(12): 13-16.
[3] LEVITT R E, PARKER H W. Reducing construction accident top management's role[J]. Journal of construction Division, 1976, 102(3): 465-478.
[4] HINZE J, PANNULLO J. Safety function of job control[J]. Journal of Construction Division, 1978, 104(2): 241-249.
[5] HINZE J, RABOUD P. Safety on large building construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1988, 114(2): 286-293.
[6] ZHANG Shu(张舒), SHI Xiuzhi(史秀志), HUANG Ganghai(黄刚海). Choosing the best scheme of safety management system based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全与环境学报), 2010, 10(6): 221-226.
[7] HUA Yan(华燕), WANG Jizhi(王际芝), WANG Dong(汪东). What kind of safety management does the construction enterprise need[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal(土木工程学报), 2003, 36(3): 79-83.
[8] LIN Cheng(林成). Application of pre-alarm safety management technique in construction[J]. Construction Technology(施工技术), 2006, 35(5): 31 34.
[9] PAN Jing(潘婧), JIANG Juncheng(蒋军成). Risk evaluation of long distance pipelines basedon grey relevance theory and entropy-weighted method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全与环境学报), 2010, 10(5): 201-203.
[10] ZHANG Limei(张丽梅), DU Shoujun(杜守军), LIU Weiran(刘卫然). Study on construction safety of management system based of extension theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal(中国安全科学学报), 2011, 21(8): 138-144.
[11] LU Lan(卢岚), YANG Jing(杨静), QIN Song(秦嵩). A study on the safety assessment on building sites[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal(土木工程学报), 2003, 36(9): 46-50.
[12] ZHANG Shilian(张仕廉), SANG Feng(桑锋). Study on construction safety inherent safer system model[J]. Construction Economy(建筑经济), 2009, 30(6): 74-77.
[13] WEI Cuiping(魏翠萍), HOU Chengjun(侯成军). Three new priority methods and their comparison in the uncertain type of AHP[J]. Journal of Qufu Normal University(曲阜师范大学学报), 1996, 22(2): 25-30.
[14] WEI Yiqiang(魏毅强), LIU Jinsheng(刘进生), WANG Xuzhu(王绪柱). Concept of consistence and weights of the judgment matrix in the uncertain type of AHP . Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice(系统工程理论与实践), 1994(4): 16-22.
[15] GAU W L, BUEHRER D J. Vague sets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(2): 610-614.
[16] FU Haidong(符海东), LU Zhengding(卢正鼎). Fuzzy decision making with multicriteria basedon distance of Vague sets[J]. Journal of Huazhong University: Nature Science Edition(华中科技大学学报:自然科学版), 2003, 31(8): 77 79.
[17] LIU Aihua(刘爱华), SHI Shiliang(施式亮), WU Chao(吴超). The synthetic assessment for systematic safety based on Vague sets[J]. Engineering Science(中国工程科学), 2007, 9(3): 58-61.

服务于反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！

  本文关键词：基于区间数AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理综合评价，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。