风险与安全:“PX”议题报道中专家话语分析
发布时间：2018-12-12 22:13
【摘要】：近十年来,国内"PX"项目频频见诸于报端,成为饱受争议的对象,甚至引发了多起群体性事件。在一些普通民众心目中,"PX"不再是对二甲苯这个化工名词,而是"剧毒"和"危险"的代名词。究竟"PX"项目暗藏巨大风险,还是安全可靠?专家对此发表怎样的见解?有何判断?从报纸中的专家话语文本入手,尝试采用詹姆斯·保罗·吉(James Paul Gee)的综合话语分析法来考察"反PX派"和"挺PX派"专家是如何实现话语建构任务的,指出"专家共同体"内部的话语之争对PX形象的建构作用,并通过分析、对比专家话语"修辞建构"的实践逻辑,结合文本产生的具体情景,探索话语背后的社会影响因素。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, PX projects have been frequently reported in the newspaper, and become the object of much controversy, and even triggered many mass incidents. In the eyes of some ordinary people, "PX" is no longer a chemical term for p-xylene, but a synonym for "highly toxic" and "dangerous." Is the "PX" project potentially risky, or is it safe and reliable? What is the expert's opinion on this? What's your judgment? Starting with the text of expert discourse in newspapers, this paper attempts to use the comprehensive discourse analysis method of James Paul (James Paul Gee) to investigate how the experts of "anti-PX" and "Ting PX" have realized the task of discourse construction. This paper points out the role of the discourse controversy within the "expert Community" in constructing the image of PX, and through the analysis, compares the practical logic of the "rhetoric construction" of the expert discourse, and explores the social influence factors behind the discourse by combining the concrete situation of the text.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“争议性科技议题的公众参与科学传播研究”(项目编号:16CXW018)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：TQ086;TQ241.13
本文编号：2375320
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, PX projects have been frequently reported in the newspaper, and become the object of much controversy, and even triggered many mass incidents. In the eyes of some ordinary people, "PX" is no longer a chemical term for p-xylene, but a synonym for "highly toxic" and "dangerous." Is the "PX" project potentially risky, or is it safe and reliable? What is the expert's opinion on this? What's your judgment? Starting with the text of expert discourse in newspapers, this paper attempts to use the comprehensive discourse analysis method of James Paul (James Paul Gee) to investigate how the experts of "anti-PX" and "Ting PX" have realized the task of discourse construction. This paper points out the role of the discourse controversy within the "expert Community" in constructing the image of PX, and through the analysis, compares the practical logic of the "rhetoric construction" of the expert discourse, and explores the social influence factors behind the discourse by combining the concrete situation of the text.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“争议性科技议题的公众参与科学传播研究”(项目编号:16CXW018)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：TQ086;TQ241.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 潘志庆;;男士洁面乳包装的话语分析——以曼秀雷敦男士冰爽活性炭洁面乳为例[J];经营管理者;2013年04期
，本文编号：2375320
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/anquangongcheng/2375320.html
