高速铁路牵引变电所可靠性分析与风险评估
[Abstract]:According to the medium-and long-term Railway Network Planning, high-speed railway as a major infrastructure and major people's livelihood project will be the focus of the national construction in the future, and traction substation is the key to the power conversion control of the high-speed railway power supply system. That is to say, it is very important to study the reliability and hidden danger of electric power supply, which is responsible for the transmission of electric energy from the external power system and the stable power supply to the catenary at the same time. At the same time, the reliable operation of the high-speed railway traction substation is also the guarantee of the high-speed railway safe operation. Once the power supply failure of the high-speed rail traction substation occurs, the train will be delayed or even stopped, and a large number of passengers will be stranded, which will cause huge economic losses to the society. High-speed railway traction substation has some dynamic characteristics such as repairable redundancy and so on. Most of the traditional reliability research methods are based on static research and do not consider the repairable characteristics. In order to solve the above problems, both qualitative and quantitative analysis are carried out by using FMEA (Failure Mode And Effects Analysis, (failure Mode consequence Analysis) and DFTA (Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis, (dynamic Fault Tree Analysis) methods in reliability research. First of all, master the structural characteristics of the high-speed transformer substation, the main electrical wiring form and the electrical equipment, according to the actual operation of the site and reference materials for each primary equipment fault mode is carefully classified. Through the fault mode to find out the corresponding fault causes, fault consequences and solutions, and set up the FMEA table. Secondly, the primary equipment failure in the FMEA table is taken as the bottom event of the DFTA model of the high-speed railway traction substation, and the independent dynamic subtree and static subtree module are found according to the characteristics of the DFTA-related methods, and the reliability indexes such as availability are calculated according to the known data. Average working time before the first failure; Finally, the calculation results are analyzed to find out the weak electrical primary equipment. In the aspect of risk assessment research, based on the principle of risk assessment, the risk assessment hierarchy model of high-speed railway traction and substation is constructed, considering the four major influencing factors of personnel, environment, management and equipment. Based on the theory of fuzzy mathematics, an improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method are proposed to calculate the subjective and objective weights of the system respectively, and the final synthetic weight vectors are obtained. The principle of maximum membership degree in traditional fuzzy evaluation is replaced by the scoring mechanism, and the final score and risk grade of the system are determined. To improve fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the traditional 1 ~ 9 scale language is changed into three scale language in weighted calculation. The difficulty of calculation is simplified and the scoring mechanism overcomes some shortcomings of the maximum membership principle, which is more scientific than the traditional maximum degree of membership principle. Objectively reflect the risk level of high-speed railway traction substation. The results of an example show that the method used in the study of reliability analysis and risk assessment is simple and effective, which lays a good theoretical foundation for the practical application of the project.
【学位授予单位】:兰州交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 段在鹏;钱新明;王如君;;基于隶属度权重的化工园区供电工程模糊综合评价[J];安全与环境学报;2016年02期
2 张桦;魏本刚;李可军;梁永亮;;基于变压器马尔可夫状态评估模型和熵权模糊评价方法的风险评估技术研究[J];电力系统保护与控制;2016年05期
3 段在鹏;钱新明;夏登友;多英全;;基于蒙特卡洛模拟和主客观综合权重的化工园区配电系统模糊综合评价[J];安全与环境学报;2016年01期
4 郭发蔚;王宏辉;;基于Bayesian隧道施工风险模糊综合评估方法[J];铁道科学与工程学报;2016年02期
5 程学庆;李月;杨涛;李建海;;高速铁路供电系统安全风险研究[J];铁道科学与工程学报;2016年02期
6 杨丁颖;黄健陵;;铁路工程项目风险管理体系的构建与运行[J];铁道科学与工程学报;2015年06期
7 江婷;周洪文;张伟;;基于熵值法的地铁运营系统风险评估[J];中国水运(下半月);2015年07期
8 孙杨慧;杨坤;侯乃先;佘云峰;;航空发动机滑油系统动态故障分析[J];科技导报;2015年05期
9 郭东;王佩成;李亚;付俭;赵子兰;;基于多层次模糊评估的配电网节能潜力综合评价方法[J];陕西电力;2015年01期
10 段在鹏;钱新明;刘振翼;黄平;夏登友;多英全;;基于指标重要度及代价的系统评价后续决策[J];系统工程与电子技术;2015年07期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 杨军;煤矿安全风险评价与预警研究[D];中国矿业大学;2013年
2 王丹华;基于自动化FTA技术与FMEA技术的过程分析与改进的研究[D];南京大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 边疆;基于模糊信息熵理论的城市电网风险评估研究[D];东北电力大学;2015年
2 王健;基于动态故障树的CRH2动车组制动系统可靠性分析研究[D];北京交通大学;2014年
3 王文斌;基于FMEA和FTA的ZPW-2000A轨道电路可靠性研究[D];兰州交通大学;2014年
4 张文韬;基于动态故障树的高速铁路ATP系统可靠性研究[D];兰州交通大学;2014年
5 尚麟宇;基于FMEA分析的板级自动化故障诊断的应用研究[D];北京交通大学;2014年
6 沈丽莉;地铁供电系统可靠性评估与安全评价方法的研究[D];大连交通大学;2013年
7 蒋世琼;基于风险隐因子的道路选线风险评估方法研究[D];中南大学;2012年
8 姜南杰;电网企业作业风险评估方法应用研究[D];华南理工大学;2012年
9 丁雪成;客运专线牵引供电系统可靠性分析与评估[D];西南交通大学;2011年
10 单娜;基于FMEA和RCM的客专ZPW2000A轨道电路设备维修研究[D];西南交通大学;2010年
,本文编号:2455250
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/dianlidianqilunwen/2455250.html