临汾—运城盆地中生界沉积特征与资源潜力分析
本文选题:中生界 + 沉积体系 ; 参考:《西北大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:临汾-运城盆地位于山西省南部,是叠加在华北克拉通之上的新生代断陷盆地。以往的勘探和研究表明,该地区新生代断陷时间新、堆积地层较薄,烃源岩不发育,故缺乏油气资源潜力。但盆地新生界之下是否具有油气资源潜力,以往并未开展专门研究。中-晚三叠世及早-中侏罗世地层是鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区主要的烃源层和石油储层。临汾-运城盆地位于鄂尔多斯盆地中生代富烃凹陷的东延部分之上,因此对该地区中生界进行油气资源分析具有实际意义。根据研究区的地质特点和勘探资料实际情况,本文采用改造型盆地原盆恢复的思路,重点对临汾-运城盆地周缘残留中生界进行系统观测,通过地层对比、沉积相与物源分析、后期改造分析等,确定中生代主要时期的沉积相与盆地沉积范围。在此基础上结合最新收集的钻孔资料,推断新生界基岩地层的时代与展布。对临汾-运城盆地前新生界资源潜力进行了初步探讨。区域地层对比认为,山西地区中-上三叠统铜川组、延长组与今鄂尔多斯盆地延长组对应;下-中侏罗统大同组、云冈组、天池河组,分别与鄂尔多斯盆地延安组、直罗组、安定组对应。中-上三叠统铜川组、延长组在山西地区厚度为280-620m,具有南厚北薄、南细北粗的特点,与鄂尔多斯盆地同时期地层在南北厚度差异及岩性特征上具有一致性。沉积相类型白下而上可识别出辫状河、曲流河、三角洲等,未见边缘相沉积。山西地区下-中侏罗统各组地层南北变化较大。北部大同、宁武-静乐盆地发育全,永定庄组、大同组、云冈组及天池河组均有沉积,厚度650-950m,中-南部榆社、洪洞一带仅残留云冈组、天池河组,厚度250-550m;可识别出冲积扇、辫状河、曲流河等沉积类型。大同组白北而南由含煤性好的三角洲沉积,变为含煤性差的湖相沉积。云冈组底部冲积扇沉积自北而南逐渐变薄,砾岩砾径减小,表明北部接近物源区。结合区域地质研究和对汾渭地堑边缘挤压构造变形现象的分析,认为临汾-运城盆地三叠纪-中侏罗世沉积之后,在晚侏罗世遭受过显著的区域性挤压和抬升事件,晚侏罗世沉积缺失。根据前人对鄂尔多斯盆地下白垩统的厚度恢复,认为临汾-运城盆地在早白垩时期仍可能接受沉积;但晚白垩世该地区以及西侧的吕梁山、鄂尔多斯盆地均整体抬升,遭受剥蚀。新生代早期,受NE-SW向的剪切拉张作用,南部的运城-关中地区于古新世晚期最早发生断陷;而北部临汾地区直到上新世才发生断陷,接受沉积。综合分析,恢复了中生代临汾-运城盆地主要时期的沉积面貌,认为延长组沉积期,临汾-运城盆地与鄂尔多斯盆地为统一大型沉积盆地,塔尔山陷隆以北为河流相、三角洲相为主,以南为湖相沉积;大同组沉积期,研究区内主要为河流沼泽相、三角洲相等沉积类型,相比延长组时期沉积范围大幅度缩小;云冈组-天池河组沉积期,沉积边界在临汾-运城盆地以东,太行山以西,研究区总体以冲积扇、河流相为主,该时期较大同组沉积时期范围进一步缩小。研究表明,中生代主要时期,临汾-运城盆地所在地区均有沉积,但由于后期挤压和抬升构造改造,致使现今断陷内部中生界残存不全。依据最新收集的地热和水文钻孔资料,编制了临汾-运城盆地前新生界分布图,显示仅在临汾-洪洞地区深部地层为下-中三叠统,另有小部分中-上侏罗统,研究区普遍缺失延长组、大同组同期地层。因此临汾-运城盆地中生界勘探潜力不容乐观。虽然中生界潜在烃源层段在断陷内部几乎没有保存,但上古生界石炭-二叠系在断陷深部大范围保存,且近年来煤田勘探工作已证实具有工业开采价值的煤田,故临汾-运城盆地深部的石炭-二叠系具有形成煤型天然气资源的物质条件,值得进一步研究。
[Abstract]:The Linfen Yuncheng basin, located in the southern part of Shanxi Province, is a Cenozoic fault basin superimposed on the North China Craton. Previous exploration and research showed that the Cenozoic fault subsidence time was new, the accumulation strata were thinner and the source rocks were not developed, so the potential of oil and gas resources under the Cenozoic basin was not in the past. The middle - late three - fold and early Middle Jurassic strata are the main hydrocarbon source beds and oil reservoirs in the Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas. The Linfen Yuncheng basin is located on the eastern part of the Mesozoic hydrocarbon rich sag in the Ordos Basin. Therefore, the analysis of the Mesozoic oil and gas resources in this area is of practical significance. On the basis of the geological characteristics and the actual exploration data, this paper uses the thought of the restoration of the original basin of the reformed basin, focusing on the systematic observation of the residual Mesozoic in the periphery of the Linfen Yuncheng basin, through the stratigraphic contrast, the analysis of the sedimentary and the material sources, and the later transformation analysis, to determine the sedimentary facies and the sedimentary range of the Mesozoic main period. Based on the newly collected borehole data, the age and distribution of the Cenozoic bedrock strata are deduced. The preliminary exploration of the potential of the pre Cenozoic resources in the Linfen Yuncheng basin is preliminarily discussed. The regional stratigraphic correlation holds that the middle upper three series of Tongchuan formation in the middle and upper strata of the Shanxi region is corresponding to the Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin, the lower middle Jurassic Datong formation, the Yungang formation, The Tianchi River formation, respectively, corresponds to the Yanan formation, the diazo group and the diazepam formation in the Ordos Basin, the middle upper three series Tongchuan formation, the Yanchang group is 280-620m in thickness in the Shanxi area, and has the characteristics of the South thicknesses and the southern thin north. The same period of the Ordos Basin is consistent with the thickness difference and lithology of the north and south. The upper and Middle Jurassic strata in Shanxi area have great changes. The northern Datong, the Ningwu - Jingle basin developed all, the Yongding Zhuang formation, the Datong formation, the Yungang formation and the Tianchi River formation, the thickness 650-950m, the middle - South Yushe, and Hongdong only residual Yungang formation. The Tianchi River group, with a thickness of 250-550m, can identify alluvial fan, braided river, and meandering river and other sedimentary types. The Datong group is deposited in a good coal bearing Delta in the north and south of the Datong group, and becomes a lacustrine deposit with poor coal property. The deposit of the bottom alluvial fan in the Yungang formation is thinning from the north to the South and the gravel diameter decreases. After the analysis of the tectonic deformation on the edge of the Fen Wei graben, it is believed that after the Triassic to Middle Jurassic deposits in the Linfen Yuncheng basin, there were significant regional extrusion and uplift events in the late Jurassic, and the late Jurassic deposition was missing. According to the thickness of the lower Cretaceous in the Ordos Basin, the Linfen Yuncheng basin was considered to be in the basin. The early Cretaceous may still be deposited in the early Cretaceous, but in the late Cretaceous, the Ordos Basin on the west side and the Ordos Basin were all uplifted and eroded. The early Cenozoic was affected by the shear tension of NE-SW, and the early fault of the Yuncheng Guanzhong area in the southern part of the Guanzhong Area in the late Palaeocene, and the northern Linfen region was not broken until the Pliocene. The sedimentary features of the Mesozoic Linfen Yuncheng basin were restored. The sedimentary features of the Mesozoic Linfen Yuncheng basin were restored. The sedimentary period of the Yanchang formation was considered, the Linfen Yuncheng basin and Ordos Basin were the unified large sedimentary basins, the northern part of the taulshan trapping was the river facies, the delta facies was the main and the lake facies deposits in the south, the Datong formation period, the main study area main. The sedimentary types of river marshes and deltaic are equal, compared with the period of Yanchang formation, the sedimentary boundaries of Yungang formation and Tianchi River formation are in the east of Linfen Yuncheng basin, west of Taihang Mountain, alluvial fan and river facies in the study area, and the time period is further narrowed by the sedimentary period of the Datong group. In the main period of the Mesozoic era, the region of the Linfen Yuncheng basin was deposited, but due to the late extrusion and uplift structure transformation, the Mesozoic Mesozoic in the present fault depression was incomplete. According to the latest collected geothermal and hydrologic drilling data, the distribution map of the former Cenozoic in the Linfen Yuncheng Basin was compiled, showing that it was only deep in the Linfen Hongdong region. The Mesozoic in the Linfen Yuncheng basin is not optimistic about the potential of Mesozoic exploration in the Linfen Yuncheng basin, although the potential hydrocarbon source layer in the Mesozoic is hardly preserved within the fault, but the upper Paleozoic Carboniferous Permian is preserved in a large range of deep fault, and the upper Paleozoic Carboniferous Permian is preserved in a large range, and the upper Paleozoic Carboniferous Permian is preserved in a large range. In recent years, coal field exploration has confirmed the coal field with industrial exploitation value, so the Carboniferous Permian in the deep part of the Linfen Yuncheng basin has the material conditions for forming coal type natural gas resources. It is worth further study.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:P618.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王学军;王志欣;陈杰;曾溅辉;;鄂尔多斯盆地镇北油田延长组石油运聚机理[J];石油勘探与开发;2011年03期
2 景永强;;浅析鄂尔多斯盆地延河延长组地层剖面形成及特点[J];科技致富向导;2014年11期
3 蔺宏斌,姚泾利;鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组沉积特性与物源探讨[J];西安石油学院学报(自然科学版);2000年05期
4 杨友运,文晓峰,张普成,王鹏志;鄂尔多斯盆地延长组沉积层序识别及测井响应特征[J];测井技术;2005年04期
5 曹红霞;李文厚;何卫军;陈全红;肖丽;冯娟萍;;鄂尔多斯盆地宜川地区延长组物源分析[J];煤田地质与勘探;2007年06期
6 张卫刚;郑秀臣;;姬塬地区延长组低阻油层特征分析及测井识别方法[J];海洋地质动态;2009年03期
7 朱宗良;李克永;李文厚;陈全红;;鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组富油因素分析[J];地质科技情报;2010年03期
8 马俊胜;段志强;;延长组核磁共振录井基本解释方法研究[J];钻采工艺;2010年S1期
9 郭正权;齐亚林;楚美娟;程党性;;鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组储层致密史恢复[J];石油实验地质;2012年06期
10 王亚军;高建平;赵军辉;;姬塬—元城地区延长组岩心裂缝特征描述[J];地下水;2013年06期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 吉利明;徐金鲤;宋之光;;鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖相蓝藻及其油源意义[A];中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所2012年度(第12届)学术论文汇编——离退休和其他部门[C];2013年
2 韩双彪;张金川;Brian Horsfield;唐玄;Nicolaj Mahlstedt;;鄂尔多斯盆地东南部陆相延长组页岩油气生成及相态演化特征[A];中国地质学会2013年学术年会论文摘要汇编——S13石油天然气、非常规能源勘探开发理论与技术分会场[C];2013年
3 罗静兰;刘小洪;张三;李博;林潼;白海强;;成岩作用与油气侵位对鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组砂岩储层物性的影响[A];鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中新生代演化动力学和其资源环境效应学术研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
4 陈全红;李文厚;张道锋;郭艳琴;冯娟萍;高永祥;崔军平;梁积伟;;鄂尔多斯盆地延长组浊积岩体系及油气勘探意义[A];第九届全国古地理学及沉积学学术会议论文集[C];2006年
5 张磊锋;赵鹏;;吴起地区延长组储层潜在伤害因素分析[A];石化产业科技创新与可持续发展——宁夏第五届青年科学家论坛论文集[C];2009年
6 朱国华;;我国已探明的最大低渗-特低渗岩性油田[A];2004第三届油气储层研讨会论文摘要集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 付绪凯 陈涛;宁东油田延长组喜获工业油流[N];中国石化报;2011年
2 本报记者 李军;下组合石油勘探:延长下面找“延长”[N];中国化工报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 郭艳琴;富县探区延长组储层微观特征研究[D];西北大学;2006年
2 高鹏鹏;延长油田延长组深层油气成藏主控因素及有利区预测[D];西北大学;2013年
3 庞军刚;鄂尔多斯盆地子长史家畔地区延长组储层特征研究[D];西北大学;2010年
4 马海勇;鄂尔多斯盆地中西部延长组下组合油藏控制因素研究[D];西北大学;2013年
5 李克永;鄂尔多斯盆地富黄探区延长组沉积体系与储层特征研究[D];西北大学;2011年
6 冯娟萍;陕北姚店油田北区延长组沉积相及储层微观特征研究[D];西北大学;2008年
7 谢渊;鄂尔多斯盆地富县探区上三叠统延长组层序地层与储层研究[D];成都理工大学;2002年
8 倪军;子北地区延长组油气成藏条件及富集规律研究[D];西北大学;2012年
9 刘航军;鄂尔多斯盆地延长组高自然伽马储层成因及测井评价[D];西北大学;2013年
10 赵虹;安塞油田上三叠统延长组高分辨率层序地层学特征及储层研究[D];西北大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 葛鹏莉;鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组储层评价[D];成都理工大学;2010年
2 储昭奎;鄂南镇泾地区延长组储层特征研究[D];成都理工大学;2006年
3 李兆扬;鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组沉积体系研究[D];西北大学;2012年
4 赵先超;鄂南长武地区上三叠统延长组高分辨率层序地层与储层特征研究[D];成都理工大学;2009年
5 杨琴;陕北富县探区延长组储层性质研究[D];中国地质大学;2004年
6 万友利;鄂尔多斯盆地南缘延长组物源与成岩耦合关系研究[D];成都理工大学;2011年
7 谢灏辰;鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组高分辨率层序地层格架研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2014年
8 黄龙;富县地区延长组高分辨率层序地层及层序格架内储集砂体展布规律研究[D];成都理工大学;2009年
9 樊婷婷;鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统延长组储层成岩作用研究[D];西北大学;2008年
10 罗桂滨;鄂尔多斯西部麻黄山延长组储层裂缝评价[D];成都理工大学;2008年
,本文编号:1862996
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/1862996.html