重塑土的动力特性及其对地震动的影响
[Abstract]:Earthquakes make the ground shake or even move, and often accompanied by geological disasters, its potential damage will have a serious impact on people's lives at the beginning of the 20th century, scholars at home and abroad through the earthquake research found, The effect of soil conditions on ground motion is significant. With the accumulation of a great deal of seismic damage data and the deepening of theoretical research, it is proved that the damage degree of earthquake disaster is closely related to the dynamic characteristics of soil. The dynamic characteristics of soil are reflected by two parameters: dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio, which are also the key of soil seismic response analysis and site safety assessment. At present, the research on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of undisturbed soil has been relatively mature, and the research results on dynamic parameters of remolded soil are relatively few. In this paper, the dynamic parameters of clay, silty soil and silty sand are determined by resonance column test combined with the project of site safety evaluation. According to the experimental results, the dynamic characteristics of remolded soil and undisturbed soil and their effects on ground motion were studied. 1) Resonance column tests were carried out on four types of remolded soil and undisturbed soil, namely, clay, silty clay, silt and silt, respectively. The relationship curves of maximum dynamic shear modulus, dynamic shear modulus ratio and shear strain, damping ratio and shear strain of remolded soil and undisturbed soil are presented. The dispersion degree of the maximum dynamic shear modulus relative difference of silty clay is larger than that of clay, and the dispersion of silt and silt is larger than that of clay, generally speaking, the dispersion degree of the four soils is not different. The relative dispersion of the dynamic shear modulus ratio of clay is larger than that of silty clay, silt and silt. The factors affecting the dynamic parameters of remolded soil and undisturbed soil are analyzed. Among these influencing factors, the difference of mineral composition, the structural difference and the influence of sample size are difficult to control, but the difference of granulation content, The influence of test operation and the effect of sample preparation. These three items can be improved in future tests, thus reducing the difference in dynamic parameters between remolded soil and undisturbed soil. 3) by studying the effect of consolidation time on clay and silty clay, The effect of consolidation time on the maximum dynamic shear modulus, the ratio of dynamic shear modulus to shear strain curve of remolded soil is proposed, and the influence of consolidation time on the dynamic characteristics of remolded soil is obvious. The results show that the maximum dynamic shear modulus of remolded soil increases with the extension of consolidation time, and the dynamic shear modulus ratio increases with the extension of consolidation time. The effects of dynamic shear modulus ratio of remolded soil and undisturbed soil on the peak acceleration of the surface, the response spectrum of the surface acceleration and the characteristic period of the surface response spectrum are analyzed. The dynamic shear modulus is different from the nonlinear part. The peak value of the ground acceleration calculated by the undisturbed soil value is larger than that of the remolded soil value, while the average characteristic period of the undisturbed soil value is smaller than that of the remolded soil value. The relative difference of ground motion parameters calculated by the two methods varies with the thickness of soil layer and the magnitude of earthquake.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:TU435
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈国兴;王炳辉;孙田;;饱和南京细砂动剪切模量特性的大型振动台试验研究[J];岩土工程学报;2012年04期
2 袁灿勤;;现场波速试验地基土的动剪切模量[J];江苏地质;1991年01期
3 陈国兴;刘雪珠;朱定华;胡庆兴;;南京新近沉积土动剪切模量比与阻尼比的试验研究[J];岩土工程学报;2006年08期
4 陈国兴;王炳辉;刘建达;;新近沉积土的动剪切模量和阻尼比试验研究[J];地下空间与工程学报;2008年03期
5 孙锐;陈红娟;袁晓铭;;土的非线性动剪切模量比和阻尼比不确定性分析[J];岩土工程学报;2010年08期
6 孙静;袁晓铭;孙锐;;固结比对土最大动剪切模量的影响[J];世界地震工程;2010年S1期
7 李永强;景立平;梁海安;任长青;;土体动剪切模量测定及非线性拟合方法研究[J];世界地震工程;2010年S1期
8 张向东;冯胜洋;张建俊;;辽西风积土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性试验研究[J];力学与实践;2011年01期
9 战吉艳;陈国兴;杨伟林;胡庆兴;;苏州第四纪沉积土动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J];岩土工程学报;2012年03期
10 杨传成;王冬雷;;渤海海底土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J];国际地震动态;2012年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 陈红娟;孙锐;袁晓铭;郭恩;;不同概率水准下粘土动剪切模量比对地震动的影响[A];第八届全国地震工程学术会议论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2010年
2 杨传成;王冬雷;;渤海海底土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[A];中国地震学会第14次学术大会专题[C];2012年
3 孙静;袁晓铭;陶夏新;;室内和现场测试最大动剪切模量差别的试验研究[A];第六届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2012年
4 蔡辉腾;;结构性软土动剪切模量试验对比研究[A];2012年海峡两岸破坏科学/材料试验学术会议论文摘要集[C];2012年
5 孙田;陈国兴;周恩全;李小军;;深层海床粉质黏土动剪切模量和阻尼比试验研究[A];第六届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2012年
6 陈国兴;刘雪珠;朱定华;王炳辉;胡庆兴;;江苏长江以南地区新近沉积土动剪切模量比与阻尼比研究[A];第三届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
7 孔宪京;韩国城;;微小应变测试技术及堆石坝坝料的动剪切模量与阻尼比[A];土石坝与岩土力学技术研讨会论文集[C];2001年
8 陈国兴;刘雪珠;朱定华;王炳辉;胡庆兴;;江苏长江以南地区新近沉积土动剪切模量比与阻尼比研究[A];第三届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
9 高志兵;谭慧明;陈佳;;不同试验最大动剪切模量对场地地震反应影响研究[A];第六届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会暨第二届海峡两岸地震工程青年学者研讨会论文集(Ⅱ)[C];2012年
10 张国栋;金星;李勇;;垃圾土动剪切模量和阻尼特性及影响因素分析[A];第二届全国环境岩土工程与土工合成材料技术研讨会论文集(二)[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 于啸波;季节冻土动剪切模量阻尼比试验研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2016年
2 孙静;岩土动剪切模量阻尼试验及应用研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘紫韦;双向振动作用下频率对黄土动力特性的影响研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
2 张希栋;双向动荷载作用下黄土的动变形特性试验研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
3 黄邦文;川西非饱和混合土动剪切模量和阻尼比分析[D];西南交通大学;2015年
4 李普;地震荷载下水泥土动力特性试验研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2016年
5 王帅;重塑土的动力特性及其对地震动的影响[D];黑龙江大学;2016年
6 毛浩燃;砂土共振柱动力特性研究[D];浙江海洋大学;2016年
7 王志杰;复杂初始应力状态下黄土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性试验研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2010年
8 王绍鹏;土体动弹性模量与动剪切模量关系对比研究[D];大连理工大学;2009年
9 陈红娟;土动力非线性的变异性及其对地震动影响的概率分析[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2009年
10 王志佳;土及岩石动力学参数的统计与分析[D];西南交通大学;2012年
,本文编号:2228049
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2228049.html