2015年12月25日山东平邑塌陷事件产生的位移场与应力场
[Abstract]:On December 25, 2015, gypsum mine collapsed in Pingyi County, Shandong Province. The isotropic collapse point source model is used to calculate the displacement field, horizontal stress field and Coulomb stress change on the nearby Mengshan Foreland fault. The results show that: 1) the horizontal displacement of the collapse center is 18 mm, and the horizontal displacement within the range of 5km is about 1 mm, pointing to the collapse center; The vertical subsidence of the collapse center is up to 4 mm, and within about 3km of the collapse center, the horizontal displacement and vertical displacement decrease rapidly to negligible in the distance, which is due to the shallow source of the collapse. The displacement change is limited to the local surface. 2) due to the influence of the free surface, the collapse causes the surface shrinkage stress in the 5km range of the underground 2km depth, and the surface shrinkage stress reaches 1 000 Pa. In the distance, all of them are in the state of surface expansion stress, and the maximum expansion stress is about 1 000 Pa.The surface expansion stress decreases rapidly to below 100Pa at the point about 10km from the center of the collapse. The maximum claimed stress and principal compressive stress on the plane of 2km depth are up to 10 000 Pa.The principal compressive stress shows a radial distribution centered on the collapse in the range of about 5km in which the principal compressive stress is larger than the dominant stress, and outside the collapse center about 5km. The stress is distributed in radial direction with collapse as the center, and increases with the increase of distance. The main compressive stress and the claim stress rapidly attenuate to the 100Pa order of magnitude. 3) the collapse resulted in a decrease in the Coulomb rupture stress on the Mengshan Foreland fault (the fault segment considered inactive) in the northwestern part of the country, with a maximum value of 2 500 Pa. The Coulomb fracture stress on the Mengshan Foreland fault (considered to be the active fault segment of the Quaternary left-lateral normal fault) in the southeast of China is increased to a maximum of 2 400 Pa. the risk of the fault should be paid attention to.
【作者单位】: 防灾科技学院;山东省地震局;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金(41674055) 河北省地震科技星火计划(DZ20170109001)共同资助
【分类号】:P315.727
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄吉锋;结构近似分析中的二次位移假定[J];计算力学学报;1999年01期
2 潘立宙;张小平;;地壳位移场之三维有限元分析[J];中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊;1989年02期
3 方钦志;李慧敏;王铁军;;数字图像相关分析法增量位移场测试技术[J];应用力学学报;2007年04期
4 张子达;;土的应力场和位移场流变理论分析计算方法[J];吉林工业大学学报;1985年04期
5 刘惠珊;徐凤萍;李鹏程;;液化引起的地面大位移对工程的影响及研究现状[J];工程抗震;1997年02期
6 谢新生,张超;断层位移观测中的热位移探讨[J];地壳形变与地震;1984年04期
7 王宜庚;物体表面细观位移场测量方法的研究[J];南京理工大学学报(自然科学版);2003年03期
8 肖为,李林安;复合型裂纹位移场的分析[J];固体力学学报;1988年04期
9 邹广平,张正国,夏兴有,潘信吉;平板D—M模型的张开位移研究[J];应用科技;1994年02期
10 徐宁光,,徐铸;平面一般位移场的代数重构算法[J];东南大学学报;1996年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王泳嘉;;位移不连续法与应变核[A];第三届岩石力学学术会议论文集(上)[C];1985年
2 郭保桥;陈鹏万;谢惠民;;从带测量噪声的位移场计算应变场:两种技术的研究与比较[A];第十三届全国实验力学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2012年
3 李冬青;陶军;田锡唐;李聃;;一种新的非接触式焊接动态位移场测量方法[A];第十次全国焊接会议论文集(第2册)[C];2001年
4 胡文祥;钱梦
本文编号:2295628
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2295628.html