大港油田中南部上古生界沉积相分析及储层研究
[Abstract]:Since the discovery of Dagang oil field has been over 40 years, the Huangyan depression has entered the middle and late stage of the exploration, the exploration difficulty is gradually increased, and the oil and gas accumulation area is becoming more and more complex to make the exploration work in the Dagang exploration area to seek for a second start-up. In the late 1990s, Dagang has successively found the above-Paleozoic coal measures strata as the buried hill zone of oil and gas source, which indicates that the upper Paleozoic oil and gas reservoir has great exploration potential. The sedimentary facies analysis and reservoir research were carried out in Huangyan depression by using the laboratory analysis techniques such as core, logging data, scanning electron microscope, ordinary sheet, casting sheet, mercury-pressing method and X-ray diffraction, so as to provide scientific basis for later exploration and deployment. The Carboniferous-Permian strata in the Huangbu depression are divided into Benxi Formation, Taiyuan Formation, Shanxi Formation, Lower Stone Box Group, Shangshi Box Group and Shiqianfeng Group from bottom to top. The main development of the Carboniferous-Permian strata in the Huangbu depression is that the fluvial facies sand body is mainly developed in the upper stone box group, the lower stone box group and the stone thousand peak group, and the Shanxi Formation mainly develops the delta sand body; The sandbodies of the tidal flat-o _ lake facies and the thirsty-barrier island are mainly developed in the Benxi and Taiyuan Formation. The sand body type of the Carboniferous-Permian favorable reservoir in the Huangyan depression is the fluvial facies sand body and the delta facies sand body. Based on the study of the Upper Paleozoic sandstone reservoir in the Upper Paleozoic, the upper Paleozoic reservoir is mainly composed of the feldspar sandstone and the lithic feldspar sandstone, but the vertical difference is obvious. The generalized quartz sandstone (including the rock-rock and the long-stony quartz sandstone) is mainly distributed in the lower-stone box group and the upper-stone box group, and the quartz content in the reservoir shows a significant increase from the bottom to the bottom, and the content of the rock fragments shows a tendency to lower from the bottom to the bottom. The maturity of the sandstone and the maturity of the structure are gradually decreasing. In the whole, the relatively good layer segment of the inner hole of the reservoir is the lower stone box group of the channel sand body and the key area for further exploration. The second is Taiyuan Formation, the upper stone box group is relatively poor. On the basis of data, the formation of Shanxi Formation shows very poor permeability and belongs to the non-permeable layer. The influence of diagenesis on the reservoir physical property of the study area is very obvious, and in many factors which restrict the reservoir physical property, the compaction effect basically determines the reservoir property of the sandstone, and the compaction effect plays a negative role in the reservoir physical property modification process. Resulting in a large amount of pore loss in the reservoir. In the middle and late stage of the burial depth of the sand body, the effect of the cementation gradually replaces the compaction, which is the main force to destroy the reservoir performance of the sand body, and the clay-rock cement, the carbonate cement and the siliceous cement are the main reasons for reducing the porosity and the permeability of the sandstone reservoir. The dissolution (acid corrosion and alkaline corrosion) has produced a large number of secondary pores, which greatly improves the reservoir physical property and plays an active role in the formation of the reservoir space of the oil and gas. The reservoir space of the Upper Palaeozoic Sandstone in the Huangyan depression is formed in the whole, and the remaining sections are not found in the primary pores, and the secondary-particle-soluble, intragranular and mold-shaped pores are the main ones, and only the fractures in the Shanxi Formation are relatively developed. The formation of secondary pores greatly improves reservoir physical properties. As a whole, the drainage pressure of the upper stone box group is small, the separation coefficient of the throat is small, and the connectivity of the well throat is good; the lower stone box and the Taiyuan group have the middle discharge pressure, the separation coefficient is small, the connectivity of the pore throat is lower than the upper stone box group, and the discharge pressure of the Shanxi group is the most, The separation coefficient is the highest, and the pore-throat connectivity is the worst. The upper Paleozoic reservoir in the Huangbu depression is mainly characterized by the characteristics of ultra-low porosity, low porosity and ultra-low permeability. The reservoir properties of the reservoir are influenced by many factors, and the sedimentary environment and the sedimentary facies determine the original condition of the sandstone reservoir, and the diagenesis has become the main control factor of the reservoir physical property in the post-sedimentary study area. The most favorable reservoir sand body in the Huangyan depression is the river facies sand body of the lower stone box group and the upper stone box group, and the reservoir physical property is good, which is the most promising reservoir in the upper Paleozoic in the area.
【学位授予单位】:长江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:P618.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴春萍;鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界致密砂岩储层测井地质评价[J];特种油气藏;2004年01期
2 李锦华;;鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界储层特征[J];石油化工应用;2008年06期
3 王辛;周文;谢润成;李正健;;大牛地上古生界天然气地化特征与气源追踪[J];天然气技术与经济;2011年02期
4 郭福祥;;滇西上古生界分区和板块构造[J];云南地质;1985年03期
5 赵林,夏新宇,戴金星;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气的运移与聚集[J];地质地球化学;2000年03期
6 付金华;段晓文;姜英昆;;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏地质特征及勘探方法[J];中国石油勘探;2001年04期
7 袁志祥;陈洪德;陈英毅;;鄂尔多斯盆地塔巴庙地区上古生界天然气富集高产特征[J];成都理工大学学报(自然科学版);2005年06期
8 李仲东;过敏;李良;惠宽洋;永平;;鄂尔多斯盆地北部塔巴庙地区上古生界低压力异常及其与产气性的关系[J];矿物岩石;2006年04期
9 郑松;陶伟;袁玉松;邹艳荣;王云鹏;赵长毅;胡圣标;;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界气源灶评价[J];天然气地球科学;2007年03期
10 尤欢增;李仲东;李良;惠宽洋;过敏;王震;;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界低压异常研究中应注意的几个问题[J];矿物岩石;2007年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李剑;罗霞;单秀琴;马成华;张水昌;戴金星;;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏地球化学[A];《国际有机裹体研究及其应用》短训班第十四届全国包裹体及地质流体学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
2 冯少南;许寿永;林甲兴;杨德骊;;上古生界的研究[A];中国地质科学院文集(1981)[C];1983年
3 罗霞;李剑;单秀琴;马成华;刘锐蛾;张永昌;戴金星;;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏地球化学[A];第十届全国有机地球化学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
4 杨华;张文正;李剑锋;昝川莉;;鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界天然气的地球化学研究[A];第十届全国有机地球化学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
5 胡宗全;朱建辉;;渤海湾盆地中南部上古生界天然气资源潜力[A];第二届中国石油地质年会——中国油气勘探潜力及可持续发展论文集[C];2006年
6 郑茂华;沈金松;;鄂北上古生界测井资料气层识别与评价方法[A];中国地球物理第二十一届年会论文集[C];2005年
7 杨磊;刘池阳;;鄂尔多斯盆地东北部上古生界测井层序地层研究[A];第九届全国古地理学及沉积学学术会议论文集[C];2006年
8 冉利民;;塔巴庙地区上古生界测井资料气层识别与产能预测[A];中国地球物理第二十一届年会论文集[C];2005年
9 郑和荣;胡宗全;;渤海湾盆地与鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界成藏条件对比分析[A];第三届全国沉积学大会论文摘要汇编[C];2004年
10 苗建宇;李文厚;;鄂尔多斯盆地子洲-清涧地区上古生界储层研究[A];第九届全国古地理学及沉积学学术会议论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 代俭科;埕岛上古生界两层段试获油气流[N];中国石化报;2013年
2 张抗;“大北方”上古生界:油气勘探新层系[N];中国石化报;2011年
3 王孝祥 肖毅 李广科 赵云波 吴明才;中国石化向青藏高原要油气[N];中国石化报;2004年
4 袁伟邋秦伯平 彭旭峰;东部大气田:榆林起狼烟紫气从东来[N];科技日报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 宋平;鄂尔多斯盆地横山—靖边地区上古生界储层特征研究[D];西北大学;2015年
2 王伟力;鄂尔多斯盆地中东部上古生界致密砂岩气藏成藏模式及分布规律[D];长安大学;2015年
3 李仲东;鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界压力异常及其与天然气成藏关系研究[D];成都理工大学;2006年
4 过敏;鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界天然气成藏特征研究[D];成都理工大学;2010年
5 郭德运;鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界沉积体系研究[D];西北大学;2009年
6 袁志祥;论塔巴庙上古生界隐蔽气藏[D];成都理工大学;2005年
7 刘志武;华北盆地南部上古生界储层地质与油气成藏条件研究[D];西北大学;2007年
8 姜烨;鄂尔多斯中东部上古生界层序地层与深盆气储层研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2003年
9 陈全红;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界沉积体系及油气富集规律研究[D];西北大学;2007年
10 王满;松辽盆地北部上古生界热演化史恢复[D];吉林大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 朱立;延安气田延气2-延128井区上古生界致密砂岩气测井解释研究[D];西安石油大学;2015年
2 胡维强;鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上古生界天然气成藏地球化学特征研究[D];西安石油大学;2015年
3 杨明明;延长东区上古生界盒8储层特征及综合评价[D];西安石油大学;2015年
4 王倩;鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上古生界天然气成藏动力研究[D];西安石油大学;2015年
5 马玉龙;鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界构造演化、岩性与裂缝形成关系浅析[D];西北大学;2015年
6 王方超;大港油田中南部上古生界沉积相分析及储层研究[D];长江大学;2015年
7 王新;延长东区上古生界本溪组天然气分布规律研究[D];西安石油大学;2015年
8 谢志鹏;东北地区上古生界热力学特征研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
9 邢大全;松辽盆地上古生界构造特征探究[D];吉林大学;2015年
10 王亚丽;孤西潜山上古生界沉积相及储层特征研究[D];中国石油大学;2007年
,本文编号:2507549
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2507549.html