人类活动对港湾岸线及景观变迁影响的比较研究——以中国象山港与美国坦帕湾为例
本文关键词:人类活动对港湾岸线及景观变迁影响的比较研究——以中国象山港与美国坦帕湾为例 出处:《地理学报》2016年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
更多相关文章: 港湾岸线 港湾景观 变迁 人类活动 象山港 坦帕湾
【摘要】:利用多时期遥感数据,以10年为时间步长,提取1985-2015年4个时期中国象山港和美国坦帕湾的岸线空间位置、长度和曲折度以及港湾地区景观构型、多样性和破碎度等信息,构建海岸人工化和港湾景观人工干扰指标,探讨人类活动对港湾岸线、景观演变的影响。结果表明:1近30年来,象山港和坦帕湾自然岸线长度不断缩减,人工岸线长度呈先增后稳定的态势。由于两地人类活动方式的差异,象山港局部岸段形态发生剧烈变化,岸线曲折度不断变小;而坦帕湾岸线形态变化较小,岸线曲折度几乎保持不变。2 1985-1995年,象山港海岸人工化不断加强,1995年以后有所减弱,但人类活动的影响范围逐渐变大,几乎遍及整个港湾海岸。1985-2015年,坦帕湾海岸人工化强度虽有加强,但增幅缓慢,海岸人类活动也主要集中于各沿海城市区域。3 1985-2005年,象山港和坦帕湾各人工化强度等级样区景观平均斑块面积总体呈减少趋势,但2005-2015年,象山港各强度样区景观平均斑块面积变化趋势不一,坦帕湾各强度样区变幅则较为平稳。4 1985-2005年,象山港各强度样区景观多样性指数逐渐增大,而坦帕湾变化不一;2005-2015年,两港湾人工化强度由弱至强,景观多样性指数先增后减。5 1985-2005年,象山港和坦帕湾不同人工化强度样区,景观破碎度指数逐渐增大;2005-2015年,两港湾景观破碎度指数呈减小趋势。
[Abstract]:By using multi-period remote sensing data and taking 10 years as time step, the shoreline positions of Xiangshan Port in China and Tampa Bay in the United States for four periods from 1985 to 2015 were extracted. Length and zigzag as well as the information of landscape configuration diversity and fragmentation in the harbour area were used to construct artificial coastal and artificial disturbance indexes of harbour landscape and to explore the impact of human activities on the harbour shoreline. The results show that the natural shoreline length of Xiangshan Port and Tampa Bay has been decreasing continuously in the past 30 years, and the artificial shoreline length is increasing first and then stable, due to the difference of human activities between the two places. The shape of the local shore section of Xiangshan Port has changed dramatically, and the winding degree of the shore line has become smaller and smaller. However, the shape of Tampa Bay shoreline changed little, and its zigzag degree almost remained unchanged from 1985 to 1995. The artificial coast of Xiangshan Port was continuously strengthened and weakened after 1995. However, the impact of human activities gradually increased, almost throughout the harbour coast. 1985-2015, Tampa Bay coast artificial intensity has been strengthened, but the increase is slow. Coastal human activities were also mainly concentrated in coastal urban areas from 1985 to 2005. The average patch area of Xiangshan Port and Tampa Bay was decreased in general. But from 2005 to 2015, the change trend of landscape average patch area in Xiangshan Port was different, while the change of intensity sample area in Tampa Bay was relatively stable from 1985 to 2005. The landscape diversity index of each intensity sample area of Xiangshan Port increased gradually, but the Tampa Bay varied. From 2005 to 2015, the artificial intensity of the two estuaries increased from weak to strong, the landscape diversity index increased first and then decreased from 1985 to 2005. The different artificial intensity samples of Xiangshan Port and Tampa Bay were observed. The landscape fragmentation index increased gradually; From 2005 to 2015, the landscape fragmentation index of the two estuaries showed a decreasing trend.
【作者单位】: 宁波大学城市科学系;浙江省海洋文化与经济研究中心;象山县海洋与渔业局海洋资源管理中心;宁波大学学报编辑部;南佛罗里达大学地理系;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(41171073,41471004) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y5110321) 宁波大学研究生科研创新基金(G16082,G15059)~~
【分类号】:P901;P737
【正文快照】: 5.南佛罗里达大学地理系,美国佛罗里达州坦帕33620)1引言随着社会经济的发展及陆地资源的不断被耗竭,海岸带及海洋资源的开发利用已成为沿海国家和地区的战略选择[1]。港湾作为海岸带开发的前沿与热点区域,地表过程和生态环境演化面临着人类经济社会活动带来的空前压力,加之3S
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 徐谅慧;李加林;杨磊;袁麒翔;王明月;陈鹏程;;浙江省大陆岸线资源的适宜性综合评价研究[J];中国土地科学;2015年04期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 段学军,陈雯;省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J];长江流域资源与环境;2005年05期
2 陈雯;孙伟;段学军;陈江龙;;苏州地域开发适宜性分区[J];地理学报;2006年08期
3 张鸿翔,赵千钧;海洋资源——人类可持续发展的依托[J];地球科学进展;2003年05期
4 楼东;刘亚军;朱兵见;;浙江海岸线的时空变动特征、功能分类及治理措施[J];海洋开发与管理;2012年03期
5 涂振顺;赵东波;杨顺良;任岳森;胡灯进;;港口岸线资源综合评价方法研究及其应用[J];水道港口;2010年04期
6 霍震;李亚光;;基于GIS的滇池流域人居环境适宜性评价研究[J];水土保持研究;2010年01期
7 秦丽云;;长江江苏段岸线及岸线资源综合评价[J];中国农村水利水电;2007年03期
8 王传胜,孙小伍,李建海;基于GIS的内河岸线资源评价研究——以武汉市域长江干流为例[J];自然资源学报;2002年01期
9 马荣华,杨桂山,朱红云,万荣荣;长江苏州段岸线资源利用遥感调查与GIS分析评价[J];自然资源学报;2003年06期
10 马荣华,杨桂山,陈雯,朱红云;长江江苏段岸线资源评价因子的定量分析与综合评价[J];自然资源学报;2004年02期
,本文编号:1397986
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/haiyang/1397986.html