围填海规划与环境影响评价一体化机制研究
发布时间:2018-04-12 21:17
本文选题:围填海规划 + 环境影响评价 ; 参考:《大连理工大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国沿海地区快速的城市化使得土地资源越来越紧张,为了扩展更为广阔的空间,沿海地区和城市纷纷开展了向海洋要地的围填海活动。大规模、无秩序的填海造成了海洋生态环境的严重破坏,丢失了原有海域和湿地空间的生态系统,及其具有的调节、生产和文化功能。在这种情况下,如何保证围填海有序的进行及协调其与海洋生态环境的保护成为了我国目前围填海阶段的难题。本文以围填海规划和环境影响评价为研究点,试图提出了针对我国的围填海规划和环境影响评价一体化机制,为我国未来的规划和环境管理提供有效的方法。 首先,通过文献研究和历程对比,从理论和实践两个方面总结出国外围填海规划和环评的先进经验,对比发现我国的不足。其次,在此基础上,深入研究国外的填海规划与环评机制,从组织机构、法律制度、公众参与三个层面,分别对荷兰横向和纵向的组织构架,日本的法律体系及管理制度,美国公众参与的对象、主体、程序、方式等进行分析,提炼出我国可借鉴的经验。最后,针对我国围填海规划和环境影响评价的现状和问题,提出行之有效的改进办法,并试图构建出我国围填海规划与环境影响评价的一体化机制。论文的创新之处在于填补国内对于围填海规划环评管理相关研究的理论空白,有助于规划管理与环评管理在实践上的运行,保证围填海科学、规范、有序地进行。 论文由六大部门组成。其中第一部分为绪论,明确了课题的研究背景、意义和内容,对目前国内外针对围填海规划和环评的理论研究进行分类和对比。第二部分是围填海规划与环评的发展历程,以荷兰、日本、美国和中国为例,对比分析出我国在实践过程中出现的主要问题。第三部分是本文的主体部分,共分为三章,分别对荷兰的组织结构,日本的立法制度,美国的公众参与进行深度研究探讨,总结出可借鉴的经验。第四部分分析了我国围填海规划和环评的现状,在以上研究的基础上,发现我国在组织结构、立法制度和公众参与方面的问题所在。第五部分提出了我国围填海规划与环评的一体化机制构想。最后是本研究的概况总结和不足之处,以及对未来一体化研究的展望。
[Abstract]:The rapid urbanization of coastal areas in China makes the land resources more and more tight. In order to expand the broader space coastal areas and cities have carried out reclamation activities to the sea.Large-scale, disorderly reclamation has caused serious damage to the marine ecological environment, lost the ecosystem of the original sea area and wetland space, and its regulating, production and cultural functions.In this case, how to ensure the orderly carrying out of reclamation and how to coordinate its protection with the marine ecological environment has become a difficult problem in the stage of reclamation in China.Taking reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment as research points, this paper attempts to put forward an integrated mechanism of reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment for China, which provides an effective method for future planning and environmental management in China.First, through the literature research and the history comparison, summarizes the advanced experience from the theory and the practice two aspects, the contrast discovery our country's insufficiency.Secondly, on this basis, the foreign reclamation planning and environmental assessment mechanism are studied in depth. From three aspects of organization, legal system and public participation, the horizontal and vertical organizational structure of the Netherlands, the Japanese legal system and the management system are respectively studied.The object, subject, procedure and method of American public participation are analyzed, and the experience of our country is extracted.Finally, aiming at the present situation and problems of reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment in China, an effective improvement method is put forward, and an integrated mechanism of reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment is proposed.The innovation of this paper is to fill in the theoretical blank of the relevant research on the environmental assessment management of reclamation planning in China, which is helpful to the operation of planning management and environmental assessment management in practice, and to ensure the scientific, standardized and orderly carrying out of reclamation.The paper consists of six major departments.The first part is the introduction, which clarifies the background, significance and content of the research, and classifies and compares the theoretical research on reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment at home and abroad.The second part is the development of reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment. Taking the Netherlands, Japan, the United States and China as examples, the main problems in the process of practice in China are compared and analyzed.The third part is the main part of this paper, divided into three chapters, respectively, the organization of the Netherlands, Japan's legislative system, the public participation in the United States in-depth study, summed up the experience can be used for reference.The fourth part analyzes the current situation of reclamation planning and environmental impact assessment in China. On the basis of the above research, it finds out the problems in the aspects of organizational structure, legislative system and public participation.The fifth part puts forward the integrated mechanism of reclamation planning and environmental assessment in China.The last part is the summary and deficiency of this research, as well as the prospect of integration research in the future.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:P756.8;X820.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 车秀珍,尚金城,陈冲;生态学理念在城市化进程战略环境评价中的应用[J];重庆环境科学;2002年03期
2 路立;赵勇;;规划环评机制在城市总体规划中对可持续发展战略的落实——以天津海滨休闲旅游区总体规划环评为例[J];城市;2006年06期
3 徐美玲;包存宽;;中国规划环境影响评价管理制度剖析[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
4 张珞平;港湾围垦或填海工程环境影响评价存在的问题探讨[J];福建环境;1997年03期
5 代欣召;肖荣波;刘云亚;;城乡规划与规划环评一体化实施机制思考[J];规划师;2010年08期
6 张丽君;实施可持续发展战略的重要手段——战略环境评价(SEA)[J];国土资源情报;2005年04期
7 韩·梅尔;周静;彭晖;;荷兰三角洲:寻找城市规划和水利工程新的融合[J];国际城市规划;2009年02期
8 于立;;控制型规划和指导型规划及未来规划体系的发展趋势——以荷兰与英国为例[J];国际城市规划;2011年05期
9 高春茂;日本的区域与城市规划体系[J];国外城市规划;1994年02期
10 黄日富;;荷兰围海拦海工程考察的启示[J];南方国土资源;2006年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡斯亮;围填海造地及其管理制度研究[D];中国海洋大学;2011年
,本文编号:1741464
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/haiyang/1741464.html