“中国式”环境正义困局:以济宁市的煤炭开采问题为例

发布时间：2018-03-21 04:01

  本文选题：乡村　切入点：采煤沉陷　出处：《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当前国内关于能源问题的研究忽略了能源开采过程中存在的正义问题。文章通过对重要产煤区济宁市的分析,发现不公正现象具体体现在,当地因煤炭开采而形成的沉陷区的地理-社会分布中——乡村成为采煤沉陷问题的主要安置地,村民也因此承担了更多的代价。审视相关资料,可以发现这种不公正现象形成的原因与公共权力相关,是公共权力有意安排的结果。然而令乡村居民所遭遇的环境不公正问题变得更为严重的是,在当前社会背景下,针对"被牺牲乡村"的居民所设置的救济制度不仅未能发挥应有的效用,反而制造了更为激烈的社会矛盾,乡村居民也因此遭受了更为严重的不公正对待,而这种状况的产生则与制度安排相关。就此而言,本个案丰富了国内关于能源和环境正义问题的认知,展现了环境正义问题形成和应对中存在的"中国式"困局。通过分析该个案,本文认为针对环境正义问题的分析不能简单套用西方的传统环境正义理论,而应当结合中国的社会现实,以"中国式"框架分析"中国式"问题。
[Abstract]:The current domestic research on energy problems ignores the problem of justice in the process of energy exploitation. Through the analysis of Jining City, an important coal-producing area, it is found that the unfair phenomenon is embodied in, In the geographical and social distribution of the local subsidence areas resulting from coal mining, villages and villages have become the main resettlement sites for coal mining subsidence problems, and the villagers have also borne more of the cost. Look at the relevant information. It can be found that the causes of this injustice are related to the public power and are the result of the deliberate arrangement of the public power. However, what makes the environmental injustices encountered by rural residents more serious is that, in the current social context, The relief system set up for the residents of the "sacrificed villages" has not only failed to play its due role, but also created more intense social contradictions, and rural residents have suffered more serious injustices as a result. The emergence of this situation is related to the institutional arrangements. In this context, this case enriches the understanding of energy and environmental justice issues in the country. It shows the "Chinese" dilemma in the formation and response of the environmental justice problem. By analyzing the case, this paper argues that the analysis of the environmental justice problem cannot simply apply the western traditional environmental justice theory. We should combine the social reality of China and analyze the problem of "Chinese style" in the frame of "Chinese style".
【作者单位】： 山东理工大学社会学系;淮北师范大学社会学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“我国刚性社会矛盾趋势分析与化解对策研究”(14ZDA061) 教育部人文社科青年项目“农村环境冲突中的科学话语与权力关系研究”(13YJC840032)
【分类号】：TD82
，

本文编号：1642161