当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 农业技术论文 >

灌溉方式对设施土壤腐殖质含量及其组分的影响

发布时间:2018-02-13 04:37

  本文关键词: 灌溉 设施土壤 土壤腐殖质 胡敏酸 富里酸 胡敏素 出处:《沈阳农业大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:本文自连续13年以同一灌溉方案进行番茄栽培的塑料大棚内分层采集0~80cm 土层土壤样本,测定沟灌、滴灌和渗灌3种灌溉处理的设施土壤腐殖质组分及结合态含量,通过比较其异同,探讨灌溉方式对设施土壤腐殖质含量及品质的影响机理,以期为设施蔬菜栽培条件下执行合理水分管理措施提供理论依据。该长期定位试验于沈阳农业大学科研基地内进行,共设沟灌、滴灌和渗灌3种灌溉处理,各处理灌水控制上、下限相同,为6kPa和40kPa,计划湿润比不同,分别为1.0、0.5和0.5;沟灌和滴灌的灌水方法同当地,渗灌使用发汗式多孔塑胶管灌水、灌水管埋深30cm。土壤腐殖质组分及结合态分离测定使用了常规方法。得到的主要研究结果如下。第一,各灌溉处理土壤总有机碳、腐殖质含量在0~50cm 土层均随深度增加而直线减少,在50~80 cm 土层含量较低、变异较小,说明灌溉等水分管理措施对设施土壤腐殖质的影响主要集中在0~50cm 土层内。第二,同一土层不同灌溉处理间腐殖质各组分含量差异明显。胡敏酸、富里酸和胡敏素等含量在0~20 cm 土层均表现为滴灌沟灌渗灌,20~80cm 土层均表现为渗灌滴灌沟灌;滴灌处理与渗灌相比表层土壤胡敏酸、富里酸和胡敏素等含量高、随土层深度增加下降速度快,沟灌处理剖面分布特点与滴灌相似、但含量总体上低于滴灌和渗灌。第三,依胡富比和色调系数(△logK)判断,随土层加深各灌溉处理腐殖质分子结构越复杂,分子量越大;0~80cm 土层,与滴灌和渗灌处理相比,沟灌处理的腐殖质分子结构更复杂、分子量更大。第四,腐殖质各组分及结合态含量与总有机碳、全氮、全磷等主要肥力指标含量间均具有显著或极显著的相关关系,说明设施土壤腐殖质含量及分子结构复杂度对土壤肥力具有重要影响。综合评价灌溉方式对设施土壤腐殖质的影响,滴灌效果优于沟灌和渗灌;设施蔬菜栽培时,长时间应用滴灌进行灌溉,耕层(0~20cm)土壤总有机碳含量能够维持在一较高水平,且腐殖质各组分及松结态、紧结态含量高于沟灌和渗灌处理,这对于设施蔬菜栽培的养分供应和土壤质量提升都是有利的。
[Abstract]:In this paper, soil samples of 0 ~ 80cm soil layer were collected from plastic greenhouse of tomato cultivation in the same irrigation scheme for 13 consecutive years, and the humus composition and bound state content of protected soil under furrow irrigation, drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation were measured. By comparing their similarities and differences, the effects of irrigation methods on the content and quality of humus in protected soil were discussed. The experiment was carried out in the scientific research base of Shenyang Agricultural University. There were three irrigation treatments: gully irrigation, drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the irrigation control of each treatment was carried out. The lower limit is the same, 6 KPA and 40 KPA, and the planned wetting ratio is different, 1.0 and 0.5, respectively. The irrigation methods of furrow irrigation and drip irrigation are the same as the local ones. The soil humus composition and the combined state separation were determined by conventional methods. The main results were as follows. Firstly, the soil total organic carbon and humus content of each irrigation treatment decreased linearly with the increase of soil depth. The results showed that the effect of irrigation and other water management measures on soil humus was mainly concentrated in 0 ~ 50 cm soil layer. The humus content of different irrigation treatments in the same soil layer was obviously different. The contents of Hu Min acid, fulvic acid and humin in 0 ~ 20 cm soil layer were all shown as drip irrigation furrow irrigation 20 ~ 80 cm soil layer and drip irrigation drip irrigation furrow irrigation. The content of Hu Min, fulvic acid and humin in surface soil of drip irrigation treatment was higher than that of infiltration irrigation, and decreased rapidly with the increase of soil depth. The profile distribution of furrow irrigation treatment was similar to that of drip irrigation, but the content was lower than that of drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation. According to Hu Fu ratio and hue coefficient (logK), the molecular structure of humus in furrow irrigation treatment was more complex than that in drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment, and the molecular structure of humus in each irrigation treatment was more complex, and the molecular weight of humus was higher than that of drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment. The molecular weight is higher than 4th. There is a significant or extremely significant correlation between the contents of humus components and their binding states and the contents of total organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and other main fertility indexes, such as total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and so on. The results showed that the content of humus and the complexity of molecular structure had important influence on soil fertility, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation. The soil total organic carbon content can be maintained at a higher level, and humus components and loose state, tight state content is higher than furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment, the soil total organic carbon content can be maintained at a relatively high level by drip irrigation for a long period of time, and the tight state content is higher than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment. This is beneficial to nutrient supply and soil quality improvement of vegetable cultivation.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S153.622;S275

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴景贵,席时权,姜岩;土壤腐殖质的分析化学研究进展[J];分析化学;1997年10期

2 闫娥,孙文凤;土壤腐殖质的分析化学研究现状[J];青海大学学报(自然科学版);2000年05期

3 梁重山,刘丛强,党志;现代分析技术在土壤腐殖质研究中的应用[J];土壤;2001年03期

4 王先华,金慧,胡应堂;施肥及耕作方式对不同母质土壤腐殖质含量的影响[J];湖北农业科学;2005年06期

5 王先华;胡应堂;方小宁;;不同培肥措施对黔东几类土壤腐殖质的影响[J];中国土壤与肥料;2006年05期

6 陈兰;唐晓红;魏朝富;;土壤腐殖质结构的光谱学研究进展[J];中国农学通报;2007年08期

7 张鹏;;浅析甘肃省主要农田土壤腐殖质组分[J];农业科技与信息;2008年23期

8 魏世勇;谭文峰;刘凡;;土壤腐殖质—矿物质交互作用的机制及研究进展[J];中国土壤与肥料;2009年01期

9 龚伟;颜晓元;王景燕;胡庭兴;宫渊波;;长期施肥对小麦-玉米作物系统土壤腐殖质组分碳和氮的影响[J];植物营养与肥料学报;2009年06期

10 杨俐苹;白由路;王向阳;王磊;王贺;;比色法测定土壤腐殖质组分的研究[J];腐植酸;2011年01期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 杨志斌;杨忠芳;冯海艳;刘玉杰;王洪翠;;四川成都经济区土壤腐殖质重金属元素含量特征研究[A];中国矿物岩石地球化学学会第11届学术年会论文集[C];2007年

2 陈丽珍;窦森;黄毅;马丽娜;董丽娟;周鑫;;不同地力水平土壤腐殖质组成研究[A];面向未来的土壤科学(中册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 北京农林科学院植物营养与资源研究所研究员 赵同科;科学施肥保护土壤环境[N];经济日报;2014年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 张葛;自然和人为添加生物质炭对土壤腐殖质碳和黑碳的影响[D];吉林农业大学;2015年

2 崔俊涛;微生物在土壤腐殖质形成与转化中作用的研究[D];吉林农业大学;2006年

3 张伟;纯培养和土壤中微生物形成的腐殖质研究[D];吉林农业大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 卢万鹏;桉树人工林土壤腐殖质及其与土壤主要养分的关系[D];广西大学;2015年

2 张艳鸿;秸秆深还及配施化肥对土壤理化性质和腐殖质的影响[D];吉林农业大学;2016年

3 李阳;长期施肥土壤腐殖质变化及其与土壤酸度变化的关系[D];吉林农业大学;2016年

4 刘鑫;水田不同开垦年限土壤腐殖质特征的比较[D];吉林农业大学;2015年

5 杨洋;灌溉方式对设施土壤腐殖质含量及其组分的影响[D];沈阳农业大学;2017年

6 王菊花;微生物对土壤腐殖质形成及结构的影响研究[D];吉林农业大学;2007年

7 安红艳;河北省主要土壤腐殖质特征研究[D];中国农业科学院;2012年

8 侯博特;好氧微生物在土壤腐殖质形成中的作用研究[D];吉林农业大学;2014年

9 李润;设施土壤腐殖质和有机氮形态演变及其与供氮能力关系的研究[D];山东农业大学;2006年

10 褚慧;有机和常规种植模式下土壤腐殖质特性研究[D];南京农业大学;2013年



本文编号:1507332

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/1507332.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e3909***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com